Literature DB >> 34956515

Effect of crisis intervention nursing on perioperative psychological state and self-efficacy of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Yan Li1, Sisi Chen1, Mengjie Xu1, Jiao Liu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of crisis intervention nursing on perioperative psychological state and self-efficacy of patients with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
METHOD: A total of 151 cervical cancer patients that underwent laparoscopic radical surgery during January 2018 to March 2020 in our hospital were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into control group (n=73) and observation group (n=78) according to treatment regimen. The control group received conventional nursing measures, and the observation group was treated with crisis intervention nursing in addition to the traditional measures. The changes of psychological state, self-efficacy, psychological crisis, hope degree before and after intervention, and the satisfaction of the two groups with nursing care were compared.
RESULTS: The scores of HAMA, HAMD, self-efficacy, psychological crisis and hope degree in the two groups were remarkably improved after intervention compared with before intervention (all P<0.05), and the improvement of each index in observation group was obviously superior to that in control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the satisfaction to nursing care in observation group was dramatically higher than that in control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The application of crisis intervention nursing on patients with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is conductive to alleviating the adverse emotions such as anxiety and depression, reducing their sense of psychological crisis, improving the self-efficacy and hope degree of curing disease, as well as the satisfaction rate with the nursing care, which is worthy of clinical application. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crisis intervention nursing; laparoscopy; psychological state; radical resection of cervical cancer; self-efficacy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34956515      PMCID: PMC8661230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  25 in total

1.  Mean direct medical care costs associated with cervical cancer for commercially insured patients in Texas.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Shuangshuang Fu; Wenyaw Chan; Li Xu; Zeena Shelal; Lois Ramondetta
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Sabrina Piedimonte; Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman; Walter Gotlieb; Haim Arie Abenhaim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 3.  Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sichen Zhang; Shaowei Wang; Aiming Lv; Shuai Huang
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cervical Cancer Patients' Willingness and Ability to Serve as Health Care Educators to Advocate for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake.

Authors:  Ilene G Ladd; Radhika P Gogoi; Tyler L Bogaczyk; Sharon L Larson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.

Authors:  Benny Brandt; Vasileios Sioulas; Derman Basaran; Theresa Kuhn; Katherine LaVigne; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi; Kara C Long Roche; Jennifer J Mueller; Elizabeth L Jewell; Vance A Broach; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Emily A Burger; Catherine Regan; Stephen Sy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Search for conditions to avoid parametrectomy during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fuminori Ito; Atsushi Sugiura; Shinji Toyoda; Yoshio Itani; Kana Iwai; Yuki Yamada; Yasuhito Tanase; Ryuji Kawaguchi; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Tsunekazu Kita
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era.

Authors:  Jin Hee Kim; Kyungjoo Kim; Seo Jin Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Kidong Kim; Myong Cheol Lim; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Follow-Up Care and Treatment: Perspectives of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Women and Health Care Practitioners in Tanzania.

Authors:  Lori Brand Bateman; Shaundra Blakemore; Alaya Koneru; Thereza Mtesigwa; Renicha McCree; Nedra F Lisovicz; Eric A Aris; Safina Yuma; Julius D Mwaiselage; Pauline E Jolly
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.