| Literature DB >> 31557944 |
Clarisse Brígido1,2, Esther Menéndez3,4, Ana Paço5, Bernard R Glick6, Anabela Belo7, Maria R Félix8, Solange Oliveira9, Mário Carvalho10.
Abstract
Bacterial endophytes, a subset of a plant's microbiota, can facilitate plant growth by a number of different mechanisms. The aims of this study were to assess the diversity and functionality of endophytic bacterial strains from internal root tissues of native legume species grown in two distinct sites in South of Portugal and to evaluate their ability to promote plant growth. Here, 122 endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from 12 different native legume species. Most of these bacteria possess at least one of the plant growth-promoting features tested in vitro, with indole acetic acid production being the most common feature among the isolates followed by the production of siderophores and inorganic phosphate solubilization. The results of in planta experiments revealed that co-inoculation of chickpea plants with specific endophytic bacteria along with N2-fixing symbionts significantly improved the total biomass of chickpea plants, in particular when these plants were grown under saline conditions. Altogether, this study revealed that Mediterranean native legume species are a reservoir of plant growth-promoting bacteria, that are also tolerant to salinity and to toxic levels of Mn. Thus, these bacterial endophytes are well adapted to common constraints present in soils of this region which constitutes important factors to consider in the development of bacterial inoculants for stressful conditions in the Mediterranean region.Entities:
Keywords: diversity; functionality; manganese; plant growth promotion; plant-microbe interaction; rhizobia-legume symbiosis; salinity; symbiotic performance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31557944 PMCID: PMC6843138 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7100392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
List of legume species collected in each local and the number of isolates obtained from each legume species in this study.
| Origin | Plant Species | Number of Isolates |
|---|---|---|
| Herdade da Mitra | 4 | |
| 3 | ||
| 26 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 8 | ||
| Alcácer do Sal | 2 | |
| 4 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 22 | ||
| 8 | ||
| Total | 122 |
Figure 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (approx. 700 pb) of 122 bacterial endophytes and their related type strains (accession numbers included in brackets). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method. Black nodes mean bootstrap percentages higher than 50%, which are based on 1000 replicates. Light blue- Gammaproteobacteria class; Dark blue- Betaproteobacteria class; Green- Firmicutes phylum; Yellow- Bacteroidetes phylum; Pink- Actinobacteria phylum.
Figure 2Distribution of the bacterial genera according to legume genera and origin region. Number of isolates assigned to each bacterial genus are indicated. Black shadow indicates presence of bacterial genus.
Some of the in vitro functional traits of the isolated bacterial endophytes. All of the isolates were scored as either having activity (1) or not (0) having activity, therefore the numbers indicate the number of isolates from each genus that expresses the indicated trait. Green shading indicates that <25% of the isolates exhibited medium or high levels of that trait, yellow indicates 25−50% of the isolates exhibited medium or high levels of that trait, orange indicates 50−75% of the isolates exhibited medium or high levels of that trait, and red indicates 75−100% of the isolates exhibited medium or high levels of that trait.
| Bacterial Genera | Number of Isolates | IAA Production | Cellulase Production | Siderophore Production | Phosphate Solubilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 26 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 49 | 16 | 30 | 28 | 19 |
|
| 8 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 15 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 122 | 66 | 52 | 39 | 27 |
Figure 3Percentage of isolates displaying cellulase activity and different plant growth-promoting traits: inorganic phosphate solubilization, IAA and siderophore production. (A,C,E,G) correspond to isolates obtained from legume grown in Herdade da Mitra and (B,D,F,H) from Alcácer do Sal. The percentage of isolates are distributed according to the level of IAA production, cellulase activity classes and index of siderophore production and phosphate solubilization.
Tolerance of endophytic bacteria to Al, Mn, and NaCl. * Data from [24]
| Origin Site | Origin Legume Species | Endophytic Bacterial Isolate | Maximal Concentration Tolerated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl (mM) | Mn (mM) | Al (mM) | |||
| Herdade da Mitra | 1275 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 1275 | 1 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 1 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 85 | 0.5 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 850 | 1 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 1275 | 2.5 | 0.1 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
| Alcácer do Sal |
| 850 | 2.5 | 0.1 | |
|
| 85 | 2.5 | 1 | ||
|
| 850 | 2.5 | 1 | ||
|
| 1700 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
|
| 1700 | 2.5 | 0.05 | ||
|
| 850 * | 1 * | 2.5 | ||
Figure 4Results obtained from the gnotobiotic root elongation assay. Data correspond to the mean and standard error values of 25 plants replicates. Control corresponds to uninoculated seeds. Different letters (a-j) correspond to statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). * The endophytic bacterium strain MH5 was obtained from chickpea roots from a previous study [24].
The effect of endophytic bacteria in combination with M. ciceri LMS-1 or M. mediterraneum UPM-Ca36T symbionts on chickpea biomass, nodule dry weight (NDW) and number of nodules (NN), under control, salinity and manganese conditions. # indicates statistically significant differences between positive controls (p < 0.05); ** indicates statistically significant differences between co-inoculated treatments and single inoculated treatments (p < 0.05).
| Condition | Treatment | Biomass | NDW | NN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Positive Control | 2.561 ± 0.102 | 0 | 0 |
| LMS-1 | 1.370 ± 0.040 | 0.143 ± 0.004 | 79.8 ± 7.4 | |
| LMS-1 + D4 | 1.378 ± 0.036 | 0.134 ± 0.003 | 58.2 ± 3.0 ** | |
| LMS-1+ Q1 | 1.549 ± 0.036 | 0.164 ± 0.022 | 69.3 ± 5.5 | |
| LMS-1 + MH5 | 1.552 ± 0.097 | 0.173 ± 0.019 | 70.5 ± 4.4 | |
| LMS-1 + L13 | 1.575 ± 0.075 ** | 0.167 ± 0.018 | 58.3 ± 1.0 ** | |
| Ca36 | 1.295 ± 0.048 | 0.195 ± 0.015 | 84.2 ± 4.7 | |
| Ca36 + D4 | 1.298 ± 0.029 | 0.185 ± 0.020 | 60.8 ± 6.1 ** | |
| Ca36 + Q1 | 1.204 ± 0.081 | 0.198 ± 0.016 | 69.5 ± 8.8 | |
| Ca36 + MH5 | 1.269 ± 0.057 | 0.198 ± 0.010 | 72.3 ± 14.1 | |
| Ca36 + L13 | 1.363 ± 0.037 | 0.196 ± 0.011 | 78 ± 8.3 | |
| Salt | Positive Control | 1.605 ± 0.179 # | 0 | 0 |
| LMS-1 | 0.923 ± 0.019 | 0.083 ± 0.006 | 54.6 ± 9.1 | |
| LMS-1 + D4 | 0.925 ± 0.075 | 0.076 ± 0.012 | 78.3 ± 3.1 | |
| LMS-1 + Q1 | 1.036 ± 0.037 ** | 0.088 ± 0.007 | 70.8 ± 8.4 | |
| LMS-1 + MH5 | 1.259 ± 0.102 ** | 0.104 ± 0.009 | 98.5 ± 10.2 ** | |
| LMS-1 + L13 | 1.151 ± 0.080 ** | 0.093 ± 0.012 | 89.7 ± 4.8 ** | |
| Ca36 | 0.787 ± 0.043 | 0.083 ± 0.004 | 68.0 ± 12.4 | |
| Ca36 + D4 | 1.087 ± 0.128 ** | 0.128 ± 0.014 ** | 104.5 ± 20.7 | |
| Ca36 + Q1 | 0.997 ± 0.045 ** | 0.199 ± 0.006 ** | 100.2 ±17.3 | |
| Ca36 + MH5 | 0.768 ± 0.048 | 0.093 ± 0.004 | 76.0 ± 18.3 | |
| Ca36 + L13 | 0.989 ± 0.047 ** | 0.110 ± 0.004 ** | 72.6 ± 10.4 | |
| Mn | Positive Control | 2.031 ± 0.143 # | 0 | 0 |
| LMS-1 | 0.575 ± 0.044 | 0.043 ± 0.005 | 52.0 ± 9.8 | |
| LMS-1 + D4 | 0.685 ± 0.080 | 0.048 ± 0.008 | 53.7 ± 6.3 | |
| LMS-1 + Q1 | 0.695 ± 0.067 | 0.042 ± 0.010 | 52.5 ± 3.4 | |
| LMS-1 + MH5 | 0.500± 0.044 | 0.036 ± 0.005 | 59.0 ± 9.4 | |
| LMS-1 + L13 | 0.572 ± 0.064 | 0.041 ± 0.008 | 54.0 ± 15.3 | |
| Ca36 | 0.688 ± 0.043 | 0.089 ± 0.003 | 50 ± 2.6 | |
| Ca36 + D4 | 0.528 ± 0.041 ** | 0.060 ± 0.009 ** | 31.8 ± 3.2 ** | |
| Ca36 + Q1 | 0.972 ± 0.035 ** | 0.120 ± 0.005 ** | 47.0 ± 4.9 | |
| Ca36 + MH5 | 0.636 ± 0.013 | 0.100 ± 0.004 | 61.0 ± 11.9 | |
| Ca36 + L13 | 0.807 ± 0.082 | 0.112 ± 0.009 ** | 60.2 ± 5.3 |