| Literature DB >> 31557906 |
Maissa Ben-Jabeur1, Rubén Vicente2, Camilo López-Cristoffanini3, Noura Alesami4, Naceur Djébali5, Adrian Gracia-Romero6,7, Maria Dolores Serret8,9, Marta López-Carbonell10, Jose Luis Araus11,12, Walid Hamada13.
Abstract
Coating seeds with biostimulants is among the promising approaches in crop production to increase crop tolerance to drought stress. In this study, we evaluated the potential of coating durum wheat seeds of the cultivar 'Karim' with thyme essential oil on enhancing seed germination and seedling growth, and on plant growth promotion and induction of drought resistance. Coated seeds were pre-germinated, grown in hydroponics, and grown in pots under controlled well-watered and progressive water/nutrient stress conditions. Seed coating with thyme oil increased germination rate and enhanced seedling growth development in hydroponics. In the pot experiment, thyme oil increased, when well watered, root and shoot development, chlorophyll, nitrogen balance index (NBI), abscisic acid (ABA), anthocyanins and flavonoids in leaves, decreased nitrogen isotope composition (δ15N) and increased carbon isotope composition (δ13C) of shoots. Increasing water/nutrient stress in control plants induced higher accumulation of ABA and anthocyanins coupled with a transient decrease in chlorophyll and NBI, a decrease in shoot and root development, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), shoot C content, δ15N, and an increase in δ13C, revealing the avoidance strategy adopted by the cultivar. Thyme oil had the potential to enhance the avoidance strategy by inducing roots elongation, reducing the loss of shoot and roots dry matter and chlorophyll, maintaining balanced NBI, an decreasing anthocyanins, flavonoids, and δ13C via maintaining lower ABA-mediated-stomatal closure. Thyme oil increased shoot N content and δ15N indicating preferential uptake of the 15N enriched NH4+. Coating seeds with thyme oil is suggested as a promising alternative approach to improve plant's water and nutrient status and to enhance drought resistance.Entities:
Keywords: coating; drought; isotope; resistance; thyme essential oil; wheat
Year: 2019 PMID: 31557906 PMCID: PMC6843264 DOI: 10.3390/plants8100371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The effects of thyme oil on seed germination and root and shoot dry weights and lengths of wheat plants.
|
|
|
|
|
| CC | 76.16 b ± 1.25 | 0.76 b ± 0.016 | 0.16 b ± 0.011 |
| CT | 100.00 a ± 0.0 | 2.44 a ± 0.028 | 0.34 a ± 0.012 |
| ANOVA Coating | 152.4 *** | 3289 *** | 182.1 *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| CC | 34.33 b ± 0.57 | 19.16 b ± 0.28 | 0.21 a ± 0.01 |
| CT | 38.33 a ± 0.57 | 41.66 a ± 1.52 | 0.14 b ± 0.003 |
| ANOVA Coating | 54.75 *** | 323.3 *** | 63.38 *** |
The F values are shown and the stars indicate statistical significance (*** p < 0.001). Values with different superscript letters are significantly different classes according to the least significant difeerence (LSD) test (p ≤ 0.05). CC: Coated control; CT: coated with thyme oil.
Figure 1The Effects of thyme oil on seed germination and root and shoot early growth of wheat plants. CC: Coated control; CT: Coated with thyme oil.
Water content and nutritive supply at different time points of the pots submitted to the water and nutrient stress.
| Water Content (%) | Nutritive Supply (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days after water stress started | 6 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 25 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 25 |
| Pots containing seeds coated with water (control) | 81.0 | 60.9 | 41.3 | 32.5 | 31.0 | 30.6 | 40.5 | 30.4 | 20.6 | 16.2 | 15.5 | 15.3 |
| Pots containing seeds coated with thyme oil | 80.3 | 60.3 | 40.4 | 30.7 | 30.1 | 30.3 | 40.1 | 30.1 | 20.2 | 15.3 | 15.05 | 15.1 |
| Average decrease (%) | 19.3 | 39.4 | 59.1 | 68.4 | 69.4 | 69.6 | 9.7 | 19.7 | 29.6 | 34.2 | 34.7 | 34.8 |
Shoot and root dry weight, NDVI, root to shoot ratio, and shoot nitrogen and carbon abundance and discrimination, under well-watered and water/nutrient stress conditions at 25 days post stress (dps).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CC | 35.89 b ± 3.83 | 16.04 d ± 0.57 | 55.3% | 31.28 b ± 0.72 | 9.05 d ± 0.22 | 71% | 0.16 c ± 0.00 | 0.14 d ± 0.005 | 12.5% | 0.879 a ± 0.1 | 0.565 b ± 0.03 | 35.7% |
| CT | 44.94 a ± 0.38 | 23.40 c ± 1.42 | 47.9% | 44.32 a ± 0.68 | 21.51 c ± 0.94 | 51.4% | 0.21 a ± 0.005 | 0.19 b ± 0.005 | 9.52% | 0.986 a ± 0.01 | 0.921 a ± 0.06 | 6.59% |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Coating (C) | 47.008 *** | 1006.094 *** | 300 *** | 23.182 *** | ||||||||
| Irrigation + nutrient supply (I + N) | 298.811 *** | 3138.739 *** | 33.333 *** | 11.870 ** | ||||||||
| (T × (I + N)) | 0.498 n.s. | 0.509 n.s. | 1.333 n.s. | 6.521 * | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CC | 3.54 b ± 0.08 | 3.74 b ± 0.11 | 5.34% | 5.06 b ± 0.26 | 4.32 c ± 0.07 | RR 14.6% | 47.38 a ± 2.1 | 40.88 b ± 0.58 | RR 13.7% | 30.77 c ± 0.05 | −29.80 a ± 0.08 | 3.15% |
| CT | 2.87 c ± 0.14 | 4.25 a ± 0.15 | 32.2% | 4.16 c ± 0.29 | 5.86 a ± 0.07 | IR 29% | 42.46 b ± 0.16 | 45.15 a ± 1.67 | IR 5.9% | 30.00 b ± 0.05 | −29.68 a ± 0.12 | 1.06% |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Coating (C) | 1.155 n.s. | 7.487 * | 0.168 n.s. | 86.58 *** | ||||||||
| Irrigation + nutrient supply (I + N) | 116.302 *** | 17.065 ** | 5.729 * | 187.56 *** | ||||||||
| (T × (I + N)) | 64.311 *** | 108.959 *** | 33.363 *** | 46.16 *** | ||||||||
The F values are shown, and the symbols indicate statistical significance (n.s. p > 0.1, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). Values with different superscript letters are significantly different classes according to the LSD test (p ≤ 0.05). DM: Dry matter; WW: Well watered; WNS: Water/nutrient stress; RR: Reduction rate; IR: Increase rate; CC: Coated control; CT: Coated with thyme oil.
Figure 2Shoot and root development in wheat plants under well-watered and water/nutrient stress conditions at 25 dps, CC: Coated control; CT: Coated with thyme oil.
Result of three-factor ANOVA for abscisic acid (ABA) in coated control plants and plants coated with thyme oil grown under moderate water/nutrient stress and short-term severe water/nutrient stress. The F values are shown, and the symbols indicate statistical significance (*** p < 0.001).
| Variables | Coating (C) | Irrigation + Nutrient Supply (I + N) | Days Post Stress (dps) | C × (I + N) | C × dps | (I + N) × dps | C × (I + N) × dps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABA | 77.49 *** | 1691.9 *** | 97.72 *** | 291.59 *** | 26.98 *** | 53.65 *** | 84.18 *** |
Figure 3Changes in total endogenous ABA concentrations in leaves of wheat plants either well-watered and water/nutrient stressed, WW: Well watered; WNS: Water/nutrient stress; CC: Coated control; CT: Coated with thyme oil.
Results of three-factor ANOVA for chlorophyll, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and nitrogen balance index (NBI) in coated control plants and plants coated with thyme oil grown under moderate, short-term and long-term severe water/nutrient stress.
| Traits | Chlorophyll | Flavonoids | Anthocyanins | NBI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coating (C) | 63.291 *** | 141.53 *** | 1.91 n.s. | 207.33 *** |
| Irrigation + Nutrient supply (I + N) | 4.185 n.s. | 138.03 *** | 27.22 *** | 101.57 *** |
| Time (dps) | 155.954 *** | 152.42 *** | 75.45 *** | 356.45 *** |
| Interaction (C × (I + N)) | 3.225 n.s. | 25.31 *** | 0.79 n.s. | 37.51 *** |
| Interaction (C × dps) | 53.42 *** | 209.13 *** | 35.58 *** | 77.50 *** |
| Interaction ((I + N) × dps) | 14.261 *** | 8.01 ** | 19.83 *** | 97.94 *** |
| Interaction (C × (I + N) × dps) | 0.791 n.s. | 11.86 *** | 93.97 *** | 82.85 *** |
The F values are shown, and the symbols indicate statistical significance (n.s. p > 0.1, ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4Chlorophyll, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and nitrogen balance index in leaves of wheat plants either well-watered or water/nutrient stressed, WW: Well-watered; WNS: Water/nutrient stress; CC: Coated control; CT: Coated with thyme oil.
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the experimental design.