| Literature DB >> 17459441 |
Edward J Calabrese1, Kenneth A Bachmann, A John Bailer, P Michael Bolger, Jonathan Borak, Lu Cai, Nina Cedergreen, M George Cherian, Chuang C Chiueh, Thomas W Clarkson, Ralph R Cook, David M Diamond, David J Doolittle, Michael A Dorato, Stephen O Duke, Ludwig Feinendegen, Donald E Gardner, Ronald W Hart, Kenneth L Hastings, A Wallace Hayes, George R Hoffmann, John A Ives, Zbigniew Jaworowski, Thomas E Johnson, Wayne B Jonas, Norbert E Kaminski, John G Keller, James E Klaunig, Thomas B Knudsen, Walter J Kozumbo, Teresa Lettieri, Shu-Zheng Liu, Andre Maisseu, Kenneth I Maynard, Edward J Masoro, Roger O McClellan, Harihara M Mehendale, Carmel Mothersill, David B Newlin, Herbert N Nigg, Frederick W Oehme, Robert F Phalen, Martin A Philbert, Suresh I S Rattan, Jim E Riviere, Joseph Rodricks, Robert M Sapolsky, Bobby R Scott, Colin Seymour, David A Sinclair, Joan Smith-Sonneborn, Elizabeth T Snow, Linda Spear, Donald E Stevenson, Yolene Thomas, Maurice Tubiana, Gary M Williams, Mark P Mattson.
Abstract
Many biological subdisciplines that regularly assess dose-response relationships have identified an evolutionarily conserved process in which a low dose of a stressful stimulus activates an adaptive response that increases the resistance of the cell or organism to a moderate to severe level of stress. Due to a lack of frequent interaction among scientists in these many areas, there has emerged a broad range of terms that describe such dose-response relationships. This situation has become problematic because the different terms describe a family of similar biological responses (e.g., adaptive response, preconditioning, hormesis), adversely affecting interdisciplinary communication, and possibly even obscuring generalizable features and central biological concepts. With support from scientists in a broad range of disciplines, this article offers a set of recommendations we believe can achieve greater conceptual harmony in dose-response terminology, as well as better understanding and communication across the broad spectrum of biological disciplines.Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17459441 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.02.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ISSN: 0041-008X Impact factor: 4.219