| Literature DB >> 31557729 |
Andrew Ho1, Jonah Sinick1, Tõnu Esko2, Krista Fischer2,3, Cristina Menni4, Jonas Zierer4, Maria Matey-Hernandez4, Kristen Fortney1, Eric K Morgen1.
Abstract
Glucuronic acid is a metabolite of glucose that is involved in the detoxification of xenobiotic compounds and the structure/remodeling of the extracellular matrix. We report for the first time that circulating glucuronic acid is a robust biomarker of mortality that is conserved across species. We find that glucuronic acid levels are significant predictors of all-cause mortality in three population-based cohorts from different countries with 4-20 years of follow-up (HR=1.44, p=2.9×10-6 in the discovery cohort; HR=1.13, p=0.032 and HR=1.25, p=0.017, respectively in the replication cohorts), as well as in a longitudinal study of genetically heterogenous mice (HR=1.29, p=0.018). Additionally, we find that glucuronic acid levels increase with age and predict future healthspan-related outcomes. Together, these results demonstrate glucuronic acid as a robust biomarker of longevity and healthspan.Entities:
Keywords: aging; glucuronate; glucuronic acid; lifespan; mortality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31557729 PMCID: PMC6781977 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Survival in the highest and lowest quartiles of glucuronic acid level. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the top vs. bottom quartiles of glucuronic acid level are plotted for (A) the Estonian Biobank discovery cohort, (B) the Framingham Offspring cohort, and (C) the longitudinal murine cohort.
Demographic and clinical characteristics by cohort.
| Sample size | 579 | 1,479 | 1,761 | 100 |
| Deaths | 189 | 306 | 47 | 0 |
| Median time to death (years) | 5.9 ± 3.8 | 18.3 ± 2.7 | 2.64 ± 2.1 | n/a |
| Median follow-up time (years) | 7.1 ± 2.7 | 21.5 ± 2.0 | 3.41 ± 2.39 | n/a |
| Women (%) | 69.8 | 53.0 | 100.0 | 50% |
| Age (years) | 73.3 ± 2.7 | 53.7 ± 9.2 | 64.9 ± 8.4 | 41.7 ± 12.2 |
| Body mass index | 27.3 ± 4.3 | 22.5 ± 4.9 | 26.4 ± 4.9 | 26.2 ± 3.7 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 140.1 ± 17.2 | 125.4 ± 18.7 | 131.3 ± 23.3 | 123.4 ± 13.1 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 81.0 ± 9.0 | 75.0 ± 10.4 | 77.0 ± 19.9 | 78.6 ± 11.0 |
| Current smokers (%) | 6.3 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 25.0 |
| Preexisting diabetes (%) | 0.0 | 4.5 | 10.2 | 0.0 |
| Preexisting heart disease (%) | 0.0 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Preexisting cancer (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 13.7 | 2.0 |
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohorts used in the present study are presented. Values are numbers of patients, percentages (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median ± median absolute deviation, as appropriate.
Figure 2Variation of glucuronic acid levels with age. The relationship between chronological age and glucuronic acid levels in (A) the Estonian Biobank secondary cohort, (B) the Estonian Biobank primary (discovery) cohort, and (C) the Framingham Offspring cohort. In each case, the best-fit regression line through the data is shown, with the 95% confidence interval for this line shaded in grey. Glucuronic acid concentrations are represented as standard deviations of normalized concentrations within each dataset.
Regression results relating glucuronic acid concentration to future healthspan-related outcomes.
| Self-rated health | Ordinal | -0.0837 | Points / 1 SD | 0.0106 * |
| Grip strength | Linear | -0.397 | Kg / 1 SD | 0.0271 * |
| Walk time | Linear | 0.0539 | Min / 1 SD | 0.0184 * |
| Quick walk time | Linear | 0.0576 | Min / 1 SD | 0.000943 *** |
| FEV1 | Linear | 0.0291 | L / 1 SD | 0.0463 * |
| Housework capability | Logistic | -0.175 | Good vs. Poor | 0.0233 * |
Linear, logistic, or ordinal regression models were fit to determine the predictive association of glucuronic acid with each phenotype. Analyses were corrected for standard clinical covariates. Self-rated health was measured on 5-point scale; grip strength was measured in kilograms; walk time and quick walk time were measured in minutes; FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) was measured in liters; housework capability was measured as a binary outcome. Units for the regression coefficient are given to the right of the regression coefficient values, and correspond to the above test-specific units per 1 standard-deviation change in concentration of glucuronic acid.