| Literature DB >> 31556231 |
Bin Liu1, Lianjun Yang1, Zhifei Cui1, Junchi Zheng2, Jincheng Huang3, Qinghao Zhao2, Zhihai Su1, Min Wang1, Weicong Zhang2, Jinshi Liu2, Tingxuan Wang2, Qingchu Li2, Hai Lu1.
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic, progressive disease, and its treatment is relevant to the gut microbiota. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy alters the gut microbiota in many diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. However, little is known about the effect of TNF-α blocker treatment on the gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis. Herein, the effect of a TNF-α blocker on the gut microbiota in proteoglycan-induced arthritis was investigated. Proteoglycan-induced mice were treated with an rhTNFR:Fc solution of etanercept (5 µg/g) for 4 weeks. rhTNFR:Fc treatment attenuated the arthritis incidence and severity of arthritis in the proteoglycan-induced mice and decreased inflammation in the ankle joints and ameliorated ileal tissue destruction. Moreover, high gut permeability occurred, and zonula occludens-1 and occludin protein levels were reduced in proteoglycan-induced mice. These levels were significantly restored by the administration of rhTNFR:Fc. The serum TNF-α and IL-17 levels were also decreased. In addition, flora analysis via 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing revealed that rhTNFR:Fc treatment restored the gut microbiota composition to a composition similar to that in control mice. In conclusion, anti-TNF-α therapy attenuated proteoglycan-induced arthritis progression and modulated the gut microbiota and intestinal barrier function. These results provide new insights for anti-TNF-α therapy strategies via regulating the gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing; ankylosing spondylitis; anti-TNF-alpha therapy; gut microbiota; proteoglycan-induced mice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31556231 PMCID: PMC6925169 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Figure 1RhTNFR:Fc treatment attenuated arthritis progression and body weight loss in PG‐induced mice. (a) Experimental schedule. (b) Arthritis incidence. (c) Arthritis score (*p < .05, **p < .01, rhTNFR:Fc vs. PG along). (d) The body weight changes in the three groups (n = 10/group) were monitored after the third immunization. (e) Representative HE images (400x) from mice in the three groups are shown. Bars = 500 mm. Black arrows indicate synovial hyperplasia, blue arrows indicate cartilage erosion, green arrows indicate narrowing joint space, and yellow arrows indicate pannus formation. Data values are presented as the mean ± SD
Figure 2RhTNF:Fc treatment improved intestinal barrier function and decreased the serum levels of the inflammatory cytokines TNF‐α and IL‐17A in PG‐induced mice. (a) Control mice showing smooth villi and normal glands; PG‐induced mice showing disorganized villi and disrupted villous structure; and rhTNFR:Fc mice showing mild shortening of villi (Scale bar is 100um). (b) Serum levels of DX‐4000‐FITC in the three groups. (c) The quantitative expression levels of TJ proteins in the ileal tissue of mice were determined by western blotting. (d) The relative expression percentages of the TJ proteins ZO‐1 and occludin by analysis of greyscale intensity. (e) Serum TNF‐α and (f) IL‐17A levels were determined by ELISA. (g) ZO‐1‐ and occludin‐positive staining appears brown (Scale bar is 50 µm). A high color intensity indicates a high level of the target protein. Values are expressed as the means ± SD. *p < .05, **p < .01
Figure 3Effect of rhTNFR:Fc on the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota in PG‐induced mice. (a) Total OTU analysis (≧97% identity level); the number shows the total number of OTUs in each block. (b) Chao1 index (p = .33). (c) Observed species (p = .05). (d) PD index (p = .02). ANOSIM analysis of the three groups; (e) the weighted and (f) unweighted UniFrac distances accounted for the abundance of species. R > 0 indicates that the differences between the groups were larger than the differences within the groups. (g) The weighted and (h) unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots for all samples; each point represents one mouse in this study. The top taxonomic profiles in the three groups at the (i) phylum level and (j) genus level. Differences were considered significant for p < .05
Figure 4Heatmap, functional prediction, and co‐abundance network analysis in the three groups. (a) The heatmap exhibits species differences at all levels. The color intensity represents the relative abundance of bacteria, as shown at the top of the figure. Horizontal clustering reflects the degree of abundance similarity of the species in each sample: the closer the distance and the shorter the branch, the more similar the composition was among the samples. Vertical clustering reflects the degree of expression similarity of all species in each sample: the closer the distance and the shorter the branch, the more similar the composition and richness were among the samples. (b) The representative KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways classified into level two functional categories using PICRUSt. (c) Co‐abundance network analysis of genera in the three groups. The size of each circle indicates the relative abundance of one genus. The solid line indicates a positive correlation, while the dashed line indicates a negative correlation. A thicker line indicates a stronger interaction between the two species