| Literature DB >> 31554343 |
Rosa Tundis1, Claudia Ursino2, Marco Bonesi3, Monica R Loizzo4, Vincenzo Sicari5, Teresa Pellicanò6, Ilaria L Manfredi7, Alberto Figoli8, Alfredo Cassano9.
Abstract
This study aimed at evaluating and comparing the chemical profile as well as the antityrosinase and antioxidant activities of ethanol (EtOH) and methanol (MeOH) extracts of Sambucus nigra L. (Adoxaceae) flowers and leaves in order to discover new candidates for food additives and cosmetic and pharmaceutical products. For this purpose, a novel lower-melting-point ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene (LMP ECTFE) nanofiltration (NF) membrane was employed in order to produce the concentrated fractions of S. nigra. Floral extracts were richer in phytochemicals in comparison to the leaf extracts. The High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) profile revealed rutin, quercetin, protocateuchic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and neochlorogenic acid as the most abundant compounds. Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2'-diphenil-1-picrylhydrazil (DPPH) radical scavenging, and 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) tests were used to investigate the antioxidant properties. NF retentate fractions of floral ethanol extracts exerted the highest tyrosinase inhibitory activity with an IC50 of 53.9 µg/mL and the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity (IC50 of 46.4 µg/mL). In conclusion, the present investigation revealed the potential benefits of NF application in S. nigra extracts processing, suggesting the use of retentate fractions as a promising source for antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory compounds which could pave the way for future applications.Entities:
Keywords: ECTFE; OSN; Sambucus nigra; antioxidant activity; flowers; leaves; tyrosinase inhibition
Year: 2019 PMID: 31554343 PMCID: PMC6835890 DOI: 10.3390/membranes9100127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Properties of the LMP ECTFE N2 membrane (the relative standard error is less than 5% in all cases).
| Contact Angle (°) | Mechanical Tests | Porosity (%) | Pore Size Measurements | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top side | Bottom side | EMod (N/mm2) | Tensile strength (N/mm2) | eBreak (%) | Bubble point (bar) | Largest pore size (nm) | Mean flow pore diameter (nm) | Diameter at maximum pore size distribution (nm) | |
| 105 | 114 | 370 | 17.1 | 155.4 | 42.3 | 2.43 | 180.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Figure 1Extraction of S. nigra leaves and flowers and concentration of bioactive compounds by nanofiltration.
Figure 2Permeate flux as a function of operating time in nanofiltration of methanol and ethanol extract of S. nigra (a) leaves and (b) flowers.
HPLC profile of selected phenolic acids and flavonoids of S. nigra floral extracts.
| mg/100 g ex | Ethanol Extracts | Methanol Extracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Extract | Retentate Fraction | Crude Extract | Retentate Fraction | |
| Astragalin | 30.1 ± 1.8 | 37.2 ± 2.1 | 33.1 ± 1.2 | 38.4 ± 1.6 |
| Caffeic acid | 5.9 ± 0.8 | n.d. | 8.6 ± 1.8 | n.d. |
| Chlorogenic acid | 318.6 ± 4.1 | 25.7 ± 1.5 | 460.9 ± 7.5 | 77.8 ± 1.6 |
| 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 106.1 ± 3.6 | 140.4 ± 15.5 | 320.1 ± 13.5 | 385.7 ± 12.4 |
| Ferulic acid | 15.1 ± 0.7 | 17.0 ± 0.3 | 28.1 ± 0.5 | 32.2 ± 0.3 |
| Isoquercetin | 57.5 ± 2.7 | 80.8 ± 5.3 | 75.9 ± 2.8 | 93.8 ± 5.3 |
| Kaempferol | 237.5 ± 2.9 | 314.8 ± 7.4 | 248.6 ± 2.2 | 394.8 ± 8.6 |
| Myricetin | 17.3 ± 2.5 | 22.6 ± 1.2 | 17.0 ± 0.6 | 22.5 ± 1.1 |
| Neochlorogenic acid | 112.1 ± 5.0 | 110.1 ± 3.0 | 147.5 ± 2.2 | 137.1 ± 3.0 |
| 4.5 ± 0.7 | n.d. | 4.6 ± 0.5 | n.d. | |
| Protocateuchic acid | 425.2 ± 11.0 | 438.6 ± 13.0 | 433.6 ± 10.0 | 465.8 ± 13.0 |
| Quercetin | 145.5 ± 5.3 | 254.1 ± 3.7 | 157.5 ± 4.1 | 261.1 ± 2.8 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 5.5 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 14.7 ± 0.5 |
| Rutin | 573.5 ± 5.0 | 615.9 ± 9.8 | 611.2 ± 7.2 | 657.8 ± 8.1 |
Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). n.d.: not detected.
HPLC profile of selected phenolic acids and flavonoids of S. nigra leaf extracts.
| mg/100 g ex | Ethanol Extracts | Methanol Extracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Extract | Retentate Fraction | Crude Extract | Retentate Fraction | |
| Astragalin | 5.8 ± 1.1 | 7.2 ± 1.4 | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 6.0 ± 1.2 |
| Caffeic acid | 2.6 ± 0.6 | n.d. | 18.8 ± 2.2 | n.d. |
| Chlorogenic acid | 52.1 ± 2.3 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 28.6 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 0.8 |
| 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 33.4 ± 4.3 | 13.1 ± 3.1 | 62.6 ± 10.5 | 20.8 ± 1.5 |
| Isoquercetin | 49.4 ± 3.2 | 33.4 ± 3.3 | 30.2 ± 0.3 | 20.4 ± 1.4 |
| Kaempferol | 37.5 ± 2.4 | 42.1 ± 1.5 | 42.6 ± 3.3 | 38.1 ± 2.7 |
| Myricetin | 1.3 ± 0.08 | n.d. | 1.1 ± 0.06 | n.d. |
| Neochlorogenic acid | 65.1 ± 1.5 | 68.2 ± 1.4 | 45.6 ± 2.2 | 45.0 ± 1.9 |
| 0.6 ± 0.07 | n.d. | 0.8 ± 0.05 | n.d. | |
| Quercetin | 70.3 ± 3.2 | 160.8 ± 3.5 | 78.3 ± 2.2 | 176.5 ± 6.5 |
| Rutin | 37.0 ± 1.5 | 45.7 ± 2.6 | 44.1 ± 1.5 | 50.8 ± 2.7 |
Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). n.d.: not detected.
In vitro antioxidant activity of S. nigra leaf and floral extracts.
|
| Extraction Solvent | DPPH Test | ABTS Test | FRAP Test | RACI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Crude extract | methanol | 41.3 ± 2.6** | 66.0 ± 4.0** | 84.4 ± 3.4** | −0.52 |
| ethanol | 42.1 ± 3.1** | 80.3 ± 3.3** | 102.7 ± 5.9** | 0.13 | |
| Retentate fraction | methanol | 39.2 ± 3.4** | 64.3 ± 3.6** | 90.1 ± 4.8** | −0.51 |
| ethanol | 40.6 ± 3.8** | 78.5 ± 3.2** | 110.9 ± 5.3** | 0.21 | |
|
| |||||
| Crude extract | methanol | 52.4 ± 2.9** | 48.2 ± 3.1** | 102.6 ± 4.6** | 0.03 |
| ethanol | 50.0 ± 3.0** | 73.5 ± 4.0** | 101.4 ± 5.3** | 0.31 | |
| Retentate fraction | methanol | 48.3 ± 3.8** | 46.4 ± 3.5** | 109.5 ± 5.7** | −0.01 |
| ethanol | 48.6 ± 3.7** | 72.1 ± 5.1** | 107.3 ± 4.5** | 0.36 | |
| Positive control | |||||
| Ascorbic acid | 5.0 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.03 | |||
| BHT | 63.2 ± 4.5 |
Data are given as media ± S.D. (n = 3). Differences within and between groups were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance test *** P < 0.0001 followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test: ** P < 0.01 compared with the positive controls. a Samples tested at the concentration of 2.5 mg/mL.
In vitro tyrosinase inhibitory activity of S. nigra leaf and flower extracts.
|
| Extraction Solvent | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | methanol | 204.5 ± 4.8** |
| ethanol | 298.4 ± 5.3** | |
| Retentate fraction | methanol | 189.3 ± 3.5** |
| ethanol | 212.7 ± 4.1** | |
|
| ||
| Crude extract | methanol | 62.5 ± 1.2** |
| ethanol | 188.2 ± 4.4** | |
| Retentate fraction | methanol | 53.9 ± 1.8** |
| ethanol | 134.7 ± 3.5** | |
| Positive control | ||
| Kojic acid | 10.8 ± 0.7 |
Data are given as media ± S.D. (n = 3). Differences within and between groups were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance test *** P < 0.0001 followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test: ** P < 0.01 compared with the positive control.