| Literature DB >> 31553779 |
Antonio Ivano Triggiani1, Anna Valenzano1, Valentina Trimigno1, Antonella Di Palma1, Fiorenzo Moscatelli1, Giuseppe Cibelli1, Giovanni Messina1.
Abstract
Several heart rate variability (HRV) studies show abnormalities in autonomic nervous control in obese and overweight subjects. However, some of the results appear to be controversial. Here we investigate the HRV profile in seventy adult normotensive women and its association with general and visceral adiposity. Specifically, we recorded the electrocardiographic (ECG) activity in subjects during a supine resting state for five minutes in a quiet room late in the morning. Total fat mass (TFM) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were instead estimated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Finally, we used simple a linear regression analysis of frequency and time-domain parameters to study the relationship between HRV and adiposity. Our data showed an overall reduction of the HRV related to an increase of TFM although this regression appeared significant only for high frequencies (HF). When the linear regression was applied between HRV variables and VAT, the slope of the line increases, thus unveiling a statistically significant relation (i.e. the more VAT, the lower HRV). Finally, a control analysis showed that age does not alter the relation between HRV and VAT when used as a confounding factor in multiple regression. To conclude, these findings point to abnormal activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in subjects with an excess of VAT and represent a starting point to determine a non-invasive index of cardiac wellness for clinical and nutritional application.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31553779 PMCID: PMC6760781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Distribution of visceral and subcutaneous fat in the android region in humans.
Anthropometric measures of the subjects.
| Mean | ± | Standard Deviation | Lower 95% CI of mean | Upper 95% CI of mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | |||||
| 24.07 | ± | 4.10 | 23.09 | 25.05 | |
| 1.64 | ± | 0.07 | 1.623 | 1.655 | |
| 62.87 | ± | 10.77 | 60.3 | 65.44 | |
| 23.35 | ± | 3.30 | 22.57 | 24.14 | |
| 38.27 | ± | 5.23 | 36.99 | 39.54 | |
| 58.98 | ± | 13.94 | 55.66 | 62.31 | |
| 22.69 | ± | 8.25 | 20.731 | 24.667 | |
| 34.54 | ± | 6.09 | 33.09 | 35.09 | |
| 264.93 | ± | 242.97 | 207 | 322.9 | |
| 0.39 | ± | 0.30 | 0.3194 | 0.4642 |
H: Height; W: Weight; BMI: Body Mass Index; TLM: Total Lean Mass; TFM: Total Fat Mass; VAT: Visceral Adipose Tissue. TLM, TFM, and VAT are also expressed as a percentage of body weight.
Main HRV parameters of the subjects.
| Mean | ± | Standard Deviation | Lower 95% CI of mean | Upper 95% CI of mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | |||||
| 825.4 | ± | 124.5 | 795.7 | 855.1 | |
| 55.28 | ± | 24.09 | 49.54 | 61.03 | |
| 47.63 | ± | 28.88 | 40.74 | 54.51 | |
| 83.47 | ± | 68.98 | 67.02 | 99.92 | |
| 24.66 | ± | 21.23 | 19.6 | 29.72 | |
| 1316 | ± | 2715 | 669 | 1964 | |
| 991.9 | ± | 832.9 | 793.2 | 1190 | |
| 1316 | ± | 1623 | 929.4 | 1703 | |
| 3627 | ± | 3978 | 2679 | 4576 | |
| 1.516 | ± | 1.485 | 1.16 | 1.87 |
STDRR: standard deviation of RR intervals; RMSSD: root-mean-square of all the successive RR differences; NN50: the number of successive intervals that exceed 50 ms (numbers and percentage); VLF: very low frequency band power; LF: low frequency band power; HF: high frequency band power; TP: total power (sum of VLF, LF and HF); LF/HF: the ratio of low to high frequency power.
Fig 2Linear regression between STDRR and RMSSD (Y, dependent variables) and total fat mass (TFM) and VAT, as a percentage of weight (VAT/W), respectively (X, independent variables).
HRV was expressed using a natural logarithmic unit.
Fig 3Linear regression between low frequencies (LF) and high frequencies (HF) (Y, dependent variables) and total fat mass (TFM) and visceral adipose tissue, as a percentage of weight (VAT/W), respectively (X, independent variables).
HRV was expressed using a natural logarithmic unit.
Fig 4Linear regression between VAT/W (Y, dependent variable) and AGE (X, independent variable).
Multiple regression analyses.
| AGE (y) + VAT/W (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| F (2,67) | R2 | |
| 4.195 | 0.1113 | |
| 3.701 | 0.0995 | |
| 6.243 | 0.1571 | |
| 5.984 | 0.1515 | |
Multiple regression analyses using HRV indices as dependent variables and AGE and VAT/W as dependent variables.
*: p < 0.05
**: p < 0.01