Literature DB >> 31553660

Radiologic-Radiomic Machine Learning Models for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Comparison With Expert-Level Radiologists.

Xue-Ying Sun1, Qiu-Xia Feng1, Xun Xu1, Jing Zhang1, Fei-Peng Zhu1, Yan-Hao Yang2, Yu-Dong Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of radiologicradiomic machine learning (ML) models and expert-level radiologists for differentiation of benign and malignant solid renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included a cohort of 254 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (190 clear cell RCCs [ccRCCs], 38 chromophobe RCCs [chrRCCs], and 26 papillary RCCs [pRCCs]), 26 fat-poor angioleiomyolipomas, and 10 oncocytomas with preoperative CT examinations. Lesions identified by four expert-level radiologists (> 3000 genitourinary CT and MRI studies) were manually segmented for radiologicradiomic analysis. Disease-specific support vector machine radiologic-radiomic ML models for classification of renal masses were trained and validated using a 10-fold cross-validation. Performance values for the expert-level radiologists and radiologic-radiomic ML models were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS. The performance values for the four radiologists were as follows: sensitivity of 73.7-96.8% (median, 84.5%; variance, 122.7%) and specificity of 48.4-71.9% (median, 61.8%; variance, 161.6%) for differentiating ccRCCs from pRCCs and chrRCCs; sensitivity of 73.7-96.8% (median, 84.5%; variance, 122.7%) and specificity of 52.8-88.9% for differentiating ccRCCs from fat-poor angioleiomyolipomas and oncocytomas (median, 80.6%; variance, 269.1%); and sensitivity of 28.1-60.9% (median, 84.5%; variance, 122.7%) and specificity of 75.0-88.9% for differentiating pRCCs and chrRCCs from fat-poor angioleiomyolipomas and oncocytomas (median, 50.0%; variance, 191.1%). After a 10-fold cross-validation, the radiologic-radiomic ML model yielded the following performance values for differentiating ccRCCs from pRCCs and chrRCCs, ccRCCs from fat-poor angioleiomyolipomas and oncocytomas, and pRCCs and chrRCCs from fat-poor angioleiomyolipomas and oncocytomas: a sensitivity of 90.0%, 86.3%, and 73.4% and a specificity of 89.1%, 83.3%, and 91.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION. Expert-level radiologists had obviously large variances in performance for differentiating benign from malignant solid renal masses. Radiologic-radiomic ML can be a potential way to improve interreader concordance and performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expert-level decision performance; fat-poor angioleiomyolipoma; machine learning; oncocytoma; radiomics; renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553660     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Predicting common solid renal tumors using machine learning models of classification of radiologist-assessed magnetic resonance characteristics.

Authors:  Camila Lopes Vendrami; Robert J McCarthy; Carolina Parada Villavicencio; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-14

2.  Importance of phase enhancement for machine learning classification of solid renal masses using texture analysis features at multi-phasic CT.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Kathleen Nguyen; Rebecca E Thornhill; Matthew D F McInnes; Mark Wu; Nick James
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-05

Review 3.  CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abhishta Bhandari; Muhammad Ibrahim; Chinmay Sharma; Rebecca Liong; Sonja Gustafson; Marita Prior
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-02

4.  MR texture analysis in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma.

Authors:  Abdul Razik; Ankur Goyal; Raju Sharma; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Amlesh Seth; Prasenjit Das; Balaji Ganeshan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a central scar-matched study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Qianli Ma; Pei Nie; Yingmei Zheng; Cheng Dong; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Differentiating renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma from clear cell carcinoma: using a radiomics model combined with CT imaging characteristics.

Authors:  Taek Min Kim; Hyungwoo Ahn; Hyo Jeong Lee; Min Gwan Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Sung Il Hwang; Sang Youn Kim
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 7.  Radiomics to better characterize small renal masses.

Authors:  Teele Kuusk; Joana B Neves; Maxine Tran; Axel Bex
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Automated Classification of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on a Small Computed Tomography Imaging Dataset Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Teng Zuo; Yanhua Zheng; Lingfeng He; Tao Chen; Bin Zheng; Song Zheng; Jinghang You; Xiaoyan Li; Rong Liu; Junjie Bai; Shuxin Si; Yingying Wang; Shuyi Zhang; Lili Wang; Jianhui Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Chunxiang Li; Ge Qiao; Jinghan Li; Lisha Qi; Xueqing Wei; Tan Zhang; Xing Li; Shu Deng; Xi Wei; Wenjuan Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  A Comprehensive Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Early Assessment of Renal Cancer Tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed Shehata; Ahmed Alksas; Rasha T Abouelkheir; Ahmed Elmahdy; Ahmed Shaffie; Ahmed Soliman; Mohammed Ghazal; Hadil Abu Khalifeh; Reem Salim; Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Norah Saleh Alghamdi; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.