| Literature DB >> 31550397 |
Manon Bonneau1,2, Beniamino Caputo3, Aude Ligier1, Rudy Caparros4, Sandra Unal1, Marco Perriat-Sanguinet1, Daniele Arnoldi5, Mathieu Sicard1, Mylène Weill1.
Abstract
Endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria are, to date, considered the most widespread symbionts in arthropods and are the cornerstone of major biological control strategies. Such a high prevalence is based on the ability of Wolbachia to manipulate their hosts' reproduction. One manipulation called cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is based on the death of the embryos generated by crosses between infected males and uninfected females or between individuals infected with incompatible Wolbachia strains. CI can be seen as a modification-rescue system (or mod-resc) in which paternal Wolbachia produce mod factors, inducing embryonic defects, unless the maternal Wolbachia produce compatible resc factors. Transgenic experiments in Drosophila melanogaster and Saccharomyces cerevisiae converged towards a model where the cidB Wolbachia gene is involved in the mod function while cidA is involved in the resc function. However, as cidA expression in Drosophila males was required to observe CI, it has been proposed that cidA could be involved in both resc and mod functions. A recent correlative study in natural Culex pipiens mosquito populations has revealed an association between specific cidA and cidB variations and changes in mod phenotype, also suggesting a role for both these genes in mod diversity. Here, by studying cidA and cidB genomic repertoires of individuals from newly sampled natural C. pipiens populations harbouring wPipIV strains from North Italy, we reinforce the link between cidB variation and mod phenotype variation fostering the involvement of cidB in the mod phenotype diversity. However, no association between any cidA variants or combination of cidA variants and mod phenotype variation was observed. Taken together our results in natural C. pipiens populations do not support the involvement of cidA in mod phenotype variation.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Culex pipienszzm321990; zzm321990Wolbachiazzm321990; zzm321990cidAzzm321990; zzm321990cidBzzm321990; cytoplasmic incompatibility
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31550397 PMCID: PMC6899686 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.185
Figure 1Summary of transgenic experiments and natural population studies conducted on cidA and cidB. (a) Hypothetical representation of the portion of prophage WO containing cidA and cidB CI genes in wMel and wPip Wolbachia strains. The genome of wMel contain only one copy of cidA and cidB genes (Lindsey et al., 2018). Genomes of all the wPip strains from several wPip groups investigated contain several different copies of cidA and cidB genes (Bonneau, Atyame, et al., 2018). The deubiquitinase (DUB) region is the catalytic domain of CidB protein (Beckmann et al., 2017). This region is conserved between the cidB Pip variants (Bonneau, Atyame, et al., 2018). (b) transgenic expression of cidA and cidB from either wMel or wPip‐Buckeye genomes in Drosophila melanogaster flies. The expression of both cidA Mel and cidB Mel in D. melanogaster males is required to induce CI, neither cidA Mel or cidB Mel alone can induce CI (LePage et al., 2017; Shropshire & Bordenstein, 2019). The expression of cidA Mel alone in D. melanogaster females is sufficient to rescue CI (Shropshire et al., 2018). A two‐by‐one model of CI was proposed in D. melanogaster in which cidA Mel acts as a mod factor when expressed in males and as a resc factor when expressed in females (Shropshire & Bordenstein, 2019; Shropshire et al., 2018). The production of viable transgenic male flies expressing only cidB Pip was not possible suggesting a toxic effect of the CidB Pip protein (represented by a skull) while flies expressing both cidA Pip and cidB Pip were viable and capable of CI induction. The male flies expressing cidA Pip and cidB Pip with a disrupted catalytic DUB domain were not capable to induce CI suggesting that the DUB region is functionally involved in CI. The current transgenic data in Culex pipiens support a toxin‐antidote model where cidB Pip would encode a toxin involved in the mod function while cidA Pip would encode the antidote involved in the resc but also prevent the producer from the toxicity of CidB Pip protein. (c) cidA Pip and cidB Pip variants repertoires in natural populations of C. pipiens infected with wPipIV strains. Full variant names are not shown (they all belong to the group wPipIV) and only the letter/number of the variant appear. For instance cidA α referring to cidA_IV(α) and cidB a2 to cidB_IV(a/2). The number of pairs of genes as well as their disposition in the genome might not reflect the reality as these informations are still under investigation. Males from North African and North Italian natural populations are either compatible or incompatible with females from the Tunis isofemale line depending on the wPipIV strain they carry. All the wPipIV strains carry several cidA and cidB variants inside their genomes. The variants cidB_IV(2) [i.e., cidB_IV(a/2) and cidB_IV(b/2)] were found associated with the incompatible mod phenotype in both geographical areas while the variant cidA_IV(δ) was found associated with the incompatible mod phenotype only in the North African population. Furthermore, no other cidA variant or combination of variants was found associated with mod phenotype variation in North Italian populations suggesting that only cidB plays a role in the mod phenotype variations in C. pipiens. Finally, the cidA_IV(α) variant was detected in all the wPipIV strains regardless of their mod phenotype and their geographical origins. The ubiquity of the cidA_IV(α) variant could be responsible for the reciprocal compatibility always observed between mosquitoes infected with different wPipIV strains and suggests a role of cidA in the resc function [Colour figure can be viewed at http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com]
cidA and cidB variant repertoires for seven wPipIV strains from North Italy
| Line name(a) |
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α1 | α2 | β1 | β2 | γ1 | γ2 | δ1 | δ2 | ε1† | ε2† | ||
| Luna 8 | Compatible |
|
| A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
| Luna 27 | Compatible |
|
| A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
| Luna 1 | Incompatible |
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
| Luna 3 | Incompatible |
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
| Michele 1 | Incompatible |
|
| A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
| Mezzo 9 | Incompatible |
|
| A | A | A | A | A | A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All cidA_IV (a) and cidB_IV (b) variants from Bonneau, Atyame, et al. (2018) and the present study (indicated with †) are compiled. Variants were either present in a wPip strain (P in green) or absent (A in black). Variants matching the mod phenotype are highlighted in bold letters and have a larger font. Michele 26 is in a darker color because it is the incongruent line.
Distribution of cidA_IV(α), cidA_IV(δ) and cidB_IV(2) in the 247 isofemale lines infected with wPipIV strains from North Africa, Turkey, China and North Italy
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| « Incompatible» | « Compatible» | |
|
|
China: 1/1 North Africa: 15/15 North Italy: 62/62 Turkey: 1/1
|
‐ North Africa: 163/163 North Italy: 5/5 ‐
|
|
|
China: 1/1 North Africa: 15/15 North Italy: 0/62 Turkey: 1/1
|
‐ North Africa: 16/163 North Italy: 0/5 ‐
|
|
|
China: 1/1 North Africa: 15/15 North Italy: 62/62 Turkey: 1/1
|
‐ North Africa: 8/163 North Italy: 1/5 ‐
|
The prevalence of each variant of interest is given for compatible and incompatible isofemale lines in each area, together with the total percentage of compatible or incompatible isofemale lines carrying the variant concerned, regardless of geographic origin. ‐, indicates the absence of isofemale lines with the compatible mod phenotype in a given location. The isofemale lines from North Africa, Turkey and China were previously analyzed in Bonneau, Atyame, et al. (2018).
Total cidA and cidB variant expression levels, specific cidB_IV(2) expression levels and Wolbachia density in the testes of compatible Michele26 and incompatible Mezzo9 males
| Line | Ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
( |
( |
( |
( | |
| Mezzo9 | 18.10 ± 4.72 (a) | 1.67 ± 0.56 (a) | 0.72 ± 0.23 (a) | 0.06 ± 0.01 (a) |
| Michele26 | 10.25 ± 3.42 (b) | 1.33 ± 0.31 (a) | 0.58 ± 0.18 (a) | 0.04 ± 0.02 (b) |
For each variable, letters indicate groups of statistical similarity. Mean values are expressed ± standard deviation. Wolbachia density and expression level were estimated using real‐time quantitative PCR as ratio between target genes (wsp for Wolbachia density, cidA, cidB and cidB_IV(2) for expression level) and reference genes (ace‐2 for Wolbachia density and wsp for expression level).