| Literature DB >> 31548850 |
Li-Shu Chen1, Yue-Ying Li2, Hao Chen3, Bo-Wen Liu4, Da-Wei Wang5, Yong-Hua Zhao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acupoint catgut embedding therapy characterized by acupoint, needle and catgut are superior to traditional acupuncture, due to exerting more comprehensive therapeutic efficacy. However, it is still deficient in clinical evidence for polyglycolic acid sutures, a novel biodegradable material instead of catgut, embedded for the treatment of simple obesity. In our study, we investigate the efficacy and related mechanism of polyglycolic acid sutures embedded in abdominal acupoints on simple obese persons by a randomized control trial.Entities:
Keywords: Polyglycolic acid sutures embedding therapy; Regulation of inflammatory response; Simple obesity; Therapeutic effects
Year: 2019 PMID: 31548850 PMCID: PMC6749682 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-019-0258-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Fig. 1The flow diagram of the study procedure
Characteristics of the participants
| Group | Age (years) | Height (cm) | BMI (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PASET (n = 28) | 34.43 ± 7.63 | 164 ± 0.07 | 31.50 ± 3.56 |
| Control (n = 23) | 34.60 ± 5.21 | 163 ± 0.06 | 30.57 ± 2.48 |
Comparison of anthropometric measurement values in two groups
| PASET group | Control group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | p value | Before treatment | After treatment | p value | |
| Weight (kg) | 83.05 (75.30, 92.80) | 78.90** (72.73, 89.40) | 0.000 | 83.05 (72.37, 93.15) | 81.55* (71.96, 93.30) | 0.021 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.45 (28.79, 32.88) | 29.88** (27.48, 30.65) | 0.003 | 30.68 (28.68, 32.12) | 30.07 (28.42, 34.64) | 0.218 |
| WC (cm) | 103.10 (98.00, 107.90) | 95.50** (92.95, 101.00) | 0.000 | 101.00 (97.10, 107.25) | 102.50 (96.00, 105.75) | 0.775 |
| HC (cm) | 107.00 (101.03, 112.00) | 101.00** (98.00, 108.50) | 0.000 | 109.00 (104.80, 111.00) | 108.60 (104.75, 114.60) | 0.635 |
| WtHR | 0.59 (0.58, 0.64) | 0.56** (0.53, 0.59) | 0.000 | 0.58 (0.55, 0.59) | 0.58 (0.56, 0.61) | 0.081 |
| WHR | 0.96 (0.92, 1.00) | 0.94** (0.93, 0.96) | 0.004 | 0.91 (0.89, 0.98) | 0.91 (0.90, 0.97) | 0.653 |
Statistical significant difference between before and after treatment in each group (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01)
The evaluation of life quality using IWQOL-Lite questionnaire
| PASET group | Control group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | p value | Before treatment | After treatment | p value | |
| IWQOL-Lite total | 88.00 (79.50, 103.00) | 98.00** (95.00, 112.50) | 0.002 | 85.00 (71.00, 100.00) | 85.00 (77.00, 101.50) | 0.616 |
| Physical function | 41.00 (34.50, 51.00) | 49.00** (40.00, 51.00) | 0.002 | 45.00 (41.00, 48.00) | 49.00 (39.00, 51.00) | 0.323 |
| Self-esteem | 22.00 (11.00, 29.00) | 29.00** (23.50, 33.00) | 0.000 | 22.00 (8.00, 30.00) | 16.00 (7.50, 32.00) | 0.874 |
| Sexual life | 18.00 (13.50, 20.00) | 19.00* (16.50, 20.00) | 0.048 | 19.00 (14.00, 20.00) | 20.00 (15.50, 20.00) | 0.068 |
| Public distress | 21.00 (15.50, 25.00) | 21.00* (17.50, 25.00) | 0.015 | 21.00 (13.50, 25.00) | 16.00 (15.00, 23.00) | 0.722 |
| Work | 19.00 (11.50, 20.00) | 15.00 (14.00, 18.00) | 0.302 | 14.00 (11.00, 20.00) | 14.00 (12.50, 19.00) | 0.379 |
Statistical significant difference between before and after treatment in each group (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01)
Glycemia, blood pressure and lipid profile before and after treatment
| PASET group | Control group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | p value | Before treatment | After treatment | p value | |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 78.00 (74.00, 95.75) | 77.00** (70.00, 87.00) | 0.004 | 75.50 (68.75, 77.75) | 75.00 (71.25, 80.50) | 0.294 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 117.50 (109.75, 141.50) | 112.50** (108.00, 132.50) | 0.005 | 107.50 (103.75, 120.00) | 106.50 (104.25, 121.25) | 0.803 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.33 (4.09, 6.43) | 5.23 (4.95, 5.85) | 0.796 | 5.25 (4.93, 5.66) | 5.21 (4.96, 5.68) | 0.270 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 2.48 (1.31, 4.40) | 2.24 (1.01, 4.18) | 0.535 | 1.78 (1.12, 2.60) | 1.74 (1.17, 2.45) | 0.208 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.19 (5.12, 5.97) | 5.25 (4.94, 6.22) | 0.070 | 4.75 (4.36, 5.50) | 5.03 (4.50, 5.80) | 0.683 |
| High-density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 1.12 (1.08, 1.32) | 1.35** (1.00, 1.39) | 0.008 | 1.27 (1.02, 1.50) | 1.31 (1.03, 1.50) | 0.972 |
| Low-density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 3.38 (2.83, 4.15) | 2.84* (2.50, 3.91) | 0.049 | 3.02 (2.61, 3.67) | 3.26 (3.03, 3.70) | 0.172 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 409.00 (317.00, 495.75) | 326.00* (291.75, 517.75) | 0.038 | 430.00 (341.75, 531.00) | 393.00 (313.50, 474.00) | 0.096 |
Statistical significant difference between before and after treatment in each group (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01)
The levels of inflammatory cytokines before and after treatment
| PASET group | Control group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | p value | Before treatment | After treatment | p value | |
| TNF-α | 162.76 (81.42, 201.17) | 141.21* (81.31, 177.83) | 0.049 | 157.46 (125.20, 162.94) | 165.74 (133.96, 196.16) | 0.116 |
| IL-1β | 174.45 (159.24, 304.91) | 158.29* (132.72, 264.89) | 0.023 | 175.96 (151.64, 211.33) | 175.39 (155.83, 220.14) | 0.683 |
| IL-18 | 168.41 (127.39, 224.13) | 179.73 (163.96, 237.69) | 0.173 | 173.54 (107.40, 185.49) | 141.97 (114.68, 190.74) | 0.173 |
| IL-6 | 181.41 (156.72, 272.76) | 143.44 (95.14, 257.74) | 0.134 | 142.52 (92.31, 192.52) | 177.40 (92.87, 263.68) | 0.158 |
| MCP-1 | 220.44 (184.65, 320.10) | 192.85 (180.33, 286.42) | 0.796 | 194.04 (185.92, 233.25) | 236.83 (178.53, 252.78) | 0.084 |
Statistical significant difference between before and after treatment in each group (* p < 0.05)
Fig. 2The measurement of abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue’s thickness by using B-model ultrasound. A 15-MHz linear transducer was placed perpendicular to the skin surface. Subcutaneous fat thickness (mm) was measured as the perpendicular distance from the skin surface to the upper border of the adipose/muscle interface
The thickness of abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue using ultrasound measurement
| Upper abdomen (mm) | Lower abdomen (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
| PASET group | 40.95 ± 7.03 | 37.63 ± 5.82** | 38.86 ± 6.96 | 35.37 ± 7.11** |
| Control group | 35.29 ± 5.42 | 36.94 ± 5.54 | 35.93 ± 6.24 | 36.25 ± 8.46 |
Statistical significant difference between before and after treatment in each group (** p < 0.01)