Literature DB >> 31548808

Lessons learned from a cancer knowledge translation grants program: results of an evaluation.

M A O'Brien1, T Makuwaza1,2, I D Graham3,4, L Barbera5,6,7, C C Earle8, M C Brouwers3,9, E Grunfeld1,8.   

Abstract

Background: A novel way to build capacity in knowledge translation (kt) is through kt-focused grant competitions. Since 2009, the Knowledge Translation Research Network (KT-Net) has had a cancer-related kt grants program. We undertook an evaluation of the program to determine if KT-Net was achieving its aims of building capacity in cancer kt, advancing the science of kt, building partnerships, and leveraging funding.
Methods: An adapted framework guided the evaluation. Nine funded studies from 4 competitions were included. Semi-structured telephone interviews were held with researchers, stakeholders (including knowledge users), members of grant review panels, and experts in kt. Interview transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. A review of proposal and report documents was also conducted.
Results: Funded researchers indicated that the grant competition was an essential funding program for cancer kt research. Competitions were perceived to build capacity in cancer kt among early-career researchers and to encourage innovative cancer kt research for which alternative funding sources are limited. The grants program resulted in incremental gains in advancing the science of kt. Suggestions to improve the program included stronger partnerships between the funder and the provincial cancer-system organization to optimize the application of research that is relevant to the organization's strategic objectives. Conclusions: The grants program met many of its aims by providing cancer researchers with an opportunity to gain capacity in cancer kt and by making incremental advances in kt science. Suggestions to improve the program included closer partnerships between the funder and the cancer-system organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knowledge translation; capacity building; grant competitions; integrated knowledge translation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548808      PMCID: PMC6726260          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  27 in total

Review 1.  Whatever happened to qualitative description?

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 3.  Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.

Authors:  Rachel G Tabak; Elaine C Khoong; David A Chambers; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Information needs of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive early-stage breast cancer considering adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Yolanda Madarnas; Mihaela Mates; Christine Tong; Eva Grunfeld; Shailendra Verma; Hannah Carolan; Michael Brundage
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-06-06

5.  Access to personalized medicine: factors influencing the use and value of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Y Bombard; L Rozmovits; M Trudeau; N B Leighl; K Deal; D A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.

Authors:  Malcolm R Macleod; Susan Michie; Ian Roberts; Ulrich Dirnagl; Iain Chalmers; John P A Ioannidis; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; An-Wen Chan; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: what do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Kimberly Garcia; Julie Makarski; Lubna Daraz
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions.

Authors:  Gila Neta; Michael A Sanchez; David A Chambers; Siobhan M Phillips; Bryan Leyva; Laurie Cynkin; Margaret M Farrell; Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts; Cynthia Vinson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Research funder required research partnerships: a qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Shannon L Sibbald; Jacqueline Tetroe; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario (CAHO) Adopting Research to Improve Care (ARTIC) Program: Reach, Sustainability, Spread and Lessons Learned from an Implementation Funding Model.

Authors:  Julia E Moore; Michelle Grouchy; Ian D Graham; Maureen Shandling; Winnie Doyle; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.