| Literature DB >> 31547400 |
Zhonglin Cao1, Ping Chen2, Zhong Ma3, Sheng Li4, Xingxun Gao5, Rui-Xin Wu6, Lijia Pan7, Yi Shi8.
Abstract
Near-field communication is a new kind of low-cost wireless communication technology developed in recent years, which brings great convenience to daily life activities such as medical care, food quality detection, and commerce. The integration of near-field communication devices and sensors exhibits great potential for these real-world applications by endowing sensors with new features of powerless and wireless signal transferring and conferring near field communication device with sensing function. In this review, we summarize recent progress in near field communication sensors, including the development of materials and device design and their applications in wearable personal healthcare devices. The opportunities and challenges in near-field communication sensors are discussed in the end.Entities:
Keywords: NFC antennas; applications; energy harvesting; near-field communications (NFC); sensors; wearable electronics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547400 PMCID: PMC6767079 DOI: 10.3390/s19183947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Recent progress in near-filed communication (NFC) sensors. (a) Biophysical signals monitoring. Reprinted with permission from ref. [21]. (b) Biochemical signals monitoring. Reprinted with permission from ref. [22]. (c) Food safety monitoring. Reprinted with permission from ref. [23]. (d) Plant growth monitoring. Reprinted with permission from ref. [24].
Comparison of Several Wireless Communication Technologies.
| Feature | NFC | Bluetooth | UHF RFID | Chipless RFID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reader cost | Low, smartphone | Low, smartphone | High, $1000–$2000 | High, no commercial |
| Read range | 1–2 cm for proximity cards with energy harvesting, 0.5 m for vicinity cards | 10–100 m | Up to 15 m with inlay tags with 2 dBm read IC sensitivity. Up to 3.m UHF sensors (with −9 dBm read IC sensitivity). Up to 30 m BAP. | <50 cm frequency coded 2–3 m, time-coded UWB |
| Universal Frequency regulation | Yes, ISM | Yes, ISM | No, by regions | No, often used UWB |
| ID rewritable | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Energy harvesting | Approx. 10 mW | NO | Few µW | NO |
| Tag price | Low | High | Low | Moderate |
| Memory capacity | <64 kilobits | Several kilobytes depending on the microcontroller | 96 bits EPC, typically 512 bits for users (<64 Kbytes) | <40 bits |
NFC IC with the capability of energy harvesting (ADC—analog-to-digital converter; SPI—serial peripheral interface; UART—universal asynchronous receiver-transmitter).
| NFC IC | Energy Harvesting Maximum Sink | ADC | Bus | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M24LR04E-R | 6 mA/3 V | Yes | I2C | ISO 15693 |
| GT23SC6699-1/2 Giantec Semiconductor | NA/3.2 V | No | I2C | ISO 15693 |
| SIC4310, SIC4340, SIC4341 Silicon Craft | 10 mA/3.3 V | No Yes | UART | 220 bytes EEPROM ISO 14443A |
| SL13 AMS AG | 4 mA/3.4 V | Yes | SPI | 8 kbit ISO 15693 |
| MLX90129 Melexis | 5 mA/3 V | Yes | SPI | 4 kbit ISO-15693 |
Figure 2Printing technologies for NFC antenna design. (a) Screen printing for NFC antennas. Reprinted with permission from ref. [53]. (b) Printed prototype. Reprinted with permission from ref. [70]. (c) Sintering process. Reprinted with permission from ref. [70]. (d) Measurement set up. Reprinted with permission from ref. [70].
Inductance (L) and quality factor (Q) at 13.56 MHz.
| Substrate | Technique | Q factors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI | Screen printing 90 T/cm | 5.15 ± 0.44 | 5.13 ± 0.64 |
| Screen printing 140 T/cm | 5.08 ± 0.08 | 2.51 ± 0.08 | |
| PET | Screen printing 90 T/cm | 5.09 ± 1.20 | 3.38 ± 0.68 |
| Screen printing 140 T/cm | 5.28 ± 0.31 | 2.50 ± 0.02 |
References of NFC sensors.
| Reference | Chips | Passive | Sensors Functions |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | NTAG216 M24LR04E | Yes | Biosensors and electronic implants |
| [ | SL13A, ams AG | Yes | Measuring the UV dose |
| [ | Sl13A, AS62x0 | Yes | Measuring the temperature and pressure |
| [ | AMS SL13A, AMS Inc | Yes | Monitor the thermal characterization of skin |
| [ | M24LR04E | Yes | Analysis sweat |
| [ | AMS SL13A | No | Sweat collection for biomarker analysis |
| [ | AMS SL13 | No | Wound pH monitoring |
| [ | NFC-WISP | Yes | Food safety monitoring |
| [ | SL13A | Yes | Gas monitoring |
| [ | M24LR | Yes | Soil Moisture Measurement |
Figure 3Representative examples of biophysical signals monitoring. (a) Exploded-view schematic illustrations of each layer of the skin-mounted NFC devices with rectangular coil. Reprinted with permission from ref. [83]. (b) Picture of a device on a tooth and fingernail. Reprinted with permission from ref. [51]. (c) Wearable NFC sensors attached onto teeth and fingers. Reprinted with permission from ref. [84]. (d) Construction of the UV sensor. Reprinted with permission from ref. [75].
Figure 4Applications for Biochemical signals monitoring: (a) Schematic illustration of an epidermal microfluidic sweat monitoring device and an enlarged image of the integrated near-field communication (NFC) system. Reprinted with permission from ref. [60]. (b) The NFC electronics consist of a magnetic loop antenna, NFC chip with an on-board temperature sensor, LED, and passive components. Reprinted with permission from ref. [22]. (c) Schematic of the wearable contact lens sensor, integrating the glucose sensor and intraocular pressure sensor. Reprinted with permission from ref. [102]. (d) Tears analysis with paper-based microfluidic system. Reprinted with permission from ref. [103].
Figure 5Other representative applications of NFC sensors. (a) Highly sensitive, printable nanostructured conductive polymer wireless sensor for food spoilage detection. Reprinted with permission from ref. [23]. (b) Schematic illustrating the expected “biochemo” synchronicity. Reprinted with permission from ref. [112]. (c,d) Plants growth monitoring. Reprinted with permission from ref. [24].