Literature DB >> 31542815

Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Joong-Bae Seo1, Dong-Ho Lee1, Kyu-Beom Kim1, Jae-Sung Yoo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the high failure rates of techniques used to maintain the reduction of single-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) fixation, analyses of the etiology of loss of reduction related to surgical techniques are limited. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle was related to loss of reduction in the single-tunnel technique for AC joint dislocation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation according to the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle.
METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation for AC joint dislocation from 2014 to 2018 were enrolled. The tunneling-first technique was used in the first 11 patients, while the reduction-first technique was used in the remaining 22 consecutive patients. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) were recorded. For radiological evaluation, coracoclavicular distance ratio, coracoclavicular tunnel angle, coracoid, and clavicular tunnel widths were measured.
RESULTS: The ASES score did not differ significantly between the two groups (n.s.). However, the KSS was significantly better in the reduction-first group (p = 0.031). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance ratio. However, at the last follow-up, loss of coracoclavicular distance ratio was significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, loss of the coracoclavicular distance ratio was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p < 0.001, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.602). The final follow-up clavicular tunnel width was also significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p = 0.002). Finally, the last follow-up clavicular tunnel width was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p = 0.008, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.459).
CONCLUSION: The reduction-first technique showed better clinical and radiological outcomes than the tunneling-first technique in single-tunnel CC fixation for AC joint dislocation. A large postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle was associated with loss of reduction and clavicular tunnel widening. Therefore, obtaining a straight coracoclavicular tunnel angle is crucial for achieving better outcomes and minimizing loss of reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular; Coracoclavicular; Reconstruction; Single tunnel

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31542815     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05731-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  38 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Robert A Arciero; James Bicos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.

Authors:  Michael G Michlitsch; Gregory J Adamson; Marilyn Pink; Allyson Estess; James A Shankwiler; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; David M Chowaniec; Genghis E Niver; Michael D Nowak; Bryan T Hanypsiak; James J Guerra; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Jay B Cook; James S Shaha; Douglas J Rowles; Craig R Bottoni; Steven H Shaha; John M Tokish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Shin; Nam-Ki Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Percutaneous cannulated screw coracoclavicular fixation for acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P M Tsou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with a double-button fixation system.

Authors:  Alexander Beris; Marios Lykissas; Ioannis Kostas-Agnantis; Marios Vekris; Gregory Mitsionis; Anastasios Korompilias
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Management of chronic unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-08

10.  Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Fixation With Suture Tape Augmentation After Coracoclavicular Fixation With Dog Bone Button: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Kang Heo; Seong-Jun Kim; Jae-Uk Jung; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-10-22
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Effectiveness analysis of Endobutton plate combined with high-strength suture Nice knot fixation in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures].

Authors:  Jishi Jiang; Yunlei Zhai; Xubing Huang; Wei Jiao; Wei Wang; Biao Guo; Li Li; Xuejun Li; Yu Nie; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 2.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Jeung Yeol Jeong; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Efficacy of Transosseous Tunnel Placement for Triple Endobutton Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Printing Guide Design Technology.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Youliang Wen; Meng-Yao Zhang; Xin Zhou; Shi-Jie Fu; Guo-You Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Acromioclavicular Fracture-Dislocation Fixation Technique With Cerclages and Osteosutures: The "Invisible" Repair.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Gustavo Vinagre; David González-Martín
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system.

Authors:  Marco-Christopher Rupp; Pavel M Kadantsev; Sebastian Siebenlist; Maximilian Hinz; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas N Muench; Daniel P Berthold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Intraoperatively Decreasing the Coracoclavicular Distance to 50% of the Unaffected Side in Stabilization of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Authors:  Prapakorn Klabklay; Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.