Literature DB >> 23139253

Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions.

Jay B Cook1, James S Shaha, Douglas J Rowles, Craig R Bottoni, Steven H Shaha, John M Tokish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern techniques for the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations have largely centered on free tendon graft reconstructions. Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated that an anatomic reconstruction with 2 clavicular bone tunnels more closely matches the properties of native coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments than more traditional techniques. No study has analyzed tunnel position in regard to risk of early failure.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of clavicular tunnel position in CC ligament reconstruction as a risk of early failure. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive series of CC ligament reconstructions performed with 2 clavicular bone tunnels and a free tendon graft. The population was largely a young, active-duty military group of patients. Radiographs were analyzed for the maintenance of reduction and location of clavicular bone tunnels using a picture archiving and communication system. The distance from the lateral border of the clavicle to the center of each bone tunnel was divided by the total clavicular length to establish a ratio. Medical records were reviewed for operative details and functional outcome. Failure was defined as loss of intraoperative reduction.
RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 28.6% (8/28) at an average of 7.4 weeks postoperatively. Comparison of bone tunnel position showed that medialized bone tunnels were a significant predictor for early loss of reduction for the conoid (a ratio of 0.292 vs 0.248; P = .012) and trapezoid bone tunnels (a ratio of 0.171 vs 0.128; P = .004); this correlated to an average of 7 to 9 mm more medial in the reconstructions that failed. Reconstructions performed with a conoid ratio of ≥0.30 were significantly more likely to fail (5/5, 100%) than were those performed lateral to a ratio of 0.30 (3/23, 13.0%) (P < .01). There were no failures when the conoid ratio was <0.25 (0/10, 0%). Conoid tunnel placement was also statistically significant for predicting return to duty in our active-duty population.
CONCLUSION: Medial tunnel placement is a significant factor in risk for early failures when performing anatomic CC ligament reconstructions. Preoperative templating is recommended to evaluate optimal placement of the clavicular bone tunnels. Placement of the conoid tunnel at 25% of the clavicular length from the lateral border of the clavicle is associated with a lower rate of lost reduction and a higher rate of return to military duty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23139253     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512465591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  25 in total

1.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Managing and recognizing complications after treatment of acromioclavicular joint repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Patrick A Smith; Matthew J Smith; Seth L Sherman; David Flood; Xinning Li
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopic Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair Using a 6-Strand Polyester Suture Tape and Cortical Button Construct.

Authors:  Todd P Balog; Kyong S Min; Jacob C L Rumley; David J Wilson; Edward D Arrington
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-30

5.  Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Emre Çalışal; Levent Uğur
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Onur Kocadal; Korcan Yüksel; Melih Güven
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Dong-Ho Lee; Kyu-Beom Kim; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Shoulder acromioclavicular joint reconstruction options and outcomes.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

9.  [Chronic acromioclavicular joint injury of Rockwood V type with concomitant chronic anterior sternoclavicular instability].

Authors:  Sebastian Schmitt; Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer; Sven Lichtenberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation.

Authors:  A Panagopoulos; E Fandridis; G Delle Rose; R Ranieri; A Castagna; Z T Kokkalis; P Dimakopoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.