Literature DB >> 23352675

Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with a double-button fixation system.

Alexander Beris1, Marios Lykissas2, Ioannis Kostas-Agnantis2, Marios Vekris2, Gregory Mitsionis2, Anastasios Korompilias2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numerous static and dynamic techniques have been described for the management of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. To date, no standard technique has been established and several complications have been described for each of these techniques. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of acute AC joint reconstruction after a mini-open technique using the double-button fixation system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with acute AC joint dislocation treated with the double-button fixation system by one surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Functional assessment was performed by an independent reviewer using the DASH, Constant and the VAS scores. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance of the affected shoulder was assessed on a standard radiograph and compared with the contralateral normal one.
RESULTS: Eight patients were operated on for grade III AC joint dislocation and 4 for grade IV. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 27.5 years. The mean follow-up was 18.25 months (range: 12-30 months). At the most recent follow-up, the mean Constant score was 94.8 (range: 84-100) showing a significant increase compared with the mean pre-operative value of 34.4 (range: 25-52) (p<0.001). The mean DASH score was significantly decreased from 19.6 (range: 14-28) preoperatively to 0.25 (range: 0-3) at the last follow-up (p<0.001). The mean VAS score showed a significant decrease from 5.75 (range: 4-7) to 0.2 (range: 0-2) (p<0.001). The mean CC distance on the operated shoulder was found to have no significant difference from the CC distance on the contralateral normal side (10.5 vs. 10mm) (p>0.05). There was no evidence of AC joint osteoarthrosis, CC calcification or osteolysis of the distal clavicle or the coracoid process.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed mini-open technique provides adequate exposure of the base of the coracoid with minimal damage to the soft tissues surrounding the CC ligaments while ensures an excellent cosmetic result. We recommend this fast and relatively simple technique for all type IV injuries and for type III injuries in heavy manual workers and high-demand upper extremities athletes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352675     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Mario Fodale; Luigi Capasso; Gianpiero Cazzato; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-05-08

3.  Sports activity after anatomic acromioclavicular joint stabilisation with flip-button technique.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified Internal Fixation Technique for Acromio-Clavicular (AC) joint dislocation: The "Hidden Knot Technique".

Authors:  Hamidreza Aslani; Fateme Mirzaee; Zohreh Zafarani; Shahin Salehi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-01

5.  Coracoid clavicular tunnel angle is related with loss of reduction in a single-tunnel coracoclavicular fixation using a dog bone button in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Dong-Ho Lee; Kyu-Beom Kim; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Ultrasound of the coracoclavicular ligaments in the acute phase of an acromioclavicular disjonction: Comparison of radiographic, ultrasound and MRI findings.

Authors:  Marie Faruch Bilfeld; Franck Lapègue; Hélène Chiavassa Gandois; Marie Aurélie Bayol; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Nicolas Sans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Anatomical principles for minimally invasive reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint with anchors.

Authors:  Chuanzhi Xiong; Yaojia Lu; Qiang Wang; Gang Chen; Hansheng Hu; Zhihua Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Double-button Fixation System for Management of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Ali Torkaman; Abolfazl Bagherifard; Tahmineh Mokhatri; Mohammad Hossein Shabanpour Haghighi; Siamak Monshizadeh; Hamid Taraz; Amin Hasanvand
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-01

9.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 10.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.