| Literature DB >> 31540091 |
Karen Fong1, Denise M Tremblay2,3, Pascal Delaquis4, Lawrence Goodridge5, Roger C Levesque6, Sylvain Moineau7,8,9, Curtis A Suttle10, Siyun Wang11.
Abstract
Phages infecting members of the opportunistic human pathogen, Salmonella enterica, are widespread in natural environments and offer a potential source of agents that could be used for controlling populations of this bacterium; yet, relatively little is known about these phages. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of 45 phages of Salmonella enterica from disparate geographic locations within British Columbia, Canada. Host-range profiling revealed host-specific patterns of susceptibility and resistance, with several phages identified that have a broad-host range (i.e., able to lyse >40% of bacterial hosts tested). One phage in particular, SE13, is able to lyse 51 out of the 61 Salmonella strains tested. Comparative genomic analyses also revealed an abundance of sequence diversity in the sequenced phages. Alignment of the genomes grouped the phages into 12 clusters with three singletons. Phages within certain clusters exhibited extraordinarily high genome homology (>98% nucleotide identity), yet between clusters, genomes exhibited a span of diversity (<50% nucleotide identity). Alignment of the major capsid protein also supported the clustering pattern observed with alignment of the whole genomes. We further observed associations between genomic relatedness and the site of isolation, as well as genetic elements related to DNA metabolism and host virulence. Our data support the knowledge framework for phage diversity and phage-host interactions that are required for developing phage-based applications for various sectors, including biocontrol, detection and typing.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteriophage; Salmonella; biocontrol; comparative genomics; phage diversity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31540091 PMCID: PMC6783827 DOI: 10.3390/v11090854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Host range of isolated phages. Salmonella strains susceptible to phage infection are indicated by a clearing of 1 to 4; 0 = no lysis.
Figure 2Dendrogram of whole genome nucleotide alignment. Tree was constructed using the ClustalW alignment and the Maximum-Likelihood method in MEGA X with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap percentages are shown next to each node. Scale represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Putatively temperate phages are indicated with an asterisk (*).
Closest related sequenced phages to newly isolated phages. The closest related phages (possessing highest E-value and >50% query coverage) and their respective genera were determined through nucleotide homology using NCBI BLASTn.
| Newly Isolated Phage | Cluster | Closest Related Phage (NCBI Best Match) | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE21 | 1 |
| |
| SE22 | 1 |
| |
| SI23 | 1 |
| |
| SF10 | 2 |
| |
| SI5 | 2 |
| |
| SI3 | 2 |
| |
| SS3 | 3 |
| |
| SS9 | 3 |
| |
| SS5 | 4 |
| |
| SS1 | 4 |
| |
| SS7 | 4 |
| |
| SS6 | 4 |
| |
| SF2 | 4 |
| |
| SS8 | 4 |
| |
| SI22 | 5 |
| |
| SW9 | 5 |
| |
| SI7 | 6 | N/A | N/A |
| SW5 | 6 | N/A | N/A |
| SW3 | 6 | N/A | N/A |
| SE7 | 7 |
| |
| SE20 | 7 |
| |
| SE24 | 7 |
| |
| SF3 | 8 |
| |
| SF11 | 8 |
| |
| SE16 | 8 |
| |
| SE1 | 8 |
| |
| SE10 | 8 |
| |
| SI8 | 9 |
| |
| SF6 | 9 |
| |
| SE14 | Singleton |
| |
| SI1 | 10 |
| |
| SF4 | 10 |
| |
| SF5 | 10 |
| |
| SS10 | 10 |
| |
| SI2 | 10 |
| |
| SS4 | 10 |
| |
| SF1 | 10 |
| |
| SE4 | Singleton | N/A | |
| SE5 | Singleton |
| |
| SE13 | Singleton | N/A | |
| SE11 | 11 |
| |
| SE8 | 11 |
| |
| SE19 | 12 |
| |
| SE18 | 12 |
| |
| SE3 | 12 |
|
Genotypes and taxonomic assignments predicted from in silico analysis of 45 Salmonella phage genomes. Asterisks indicate morphotypes which have been confirmed by transmission electron microscopy [21]. Sources of phages are denoted as follows: sediment (S), cattle feces (F), sewage effluent (E), irrigation water (I), and water tanks from an aquaculture facility (W).
| Morphotype Classification | tRNA Genes |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Unclassified | Phage | Number | Phage | Number | Phage | Number | Phage | Number | Phage | Number | Phage | Cluster | Source | Phage | Cluster | Source | Phage | Cluster | Source |
| SE4 | SE3 | SE1 | SI7 | SE1 | 0 | SF1 | 0 | SI1 | 0 | SS1 | 0 | SW3 | 0 | SE21 | 1 | E | SS3 | 3 | S | SI3 | 2 | I |
| SE5 | SE7 | SE10 | SW3 | SE3 | 29 | SF2 | 0 | SI2 | 0 | SS3 | 4 | SW5 | 0 | SE22 | 1 | I | SS9 | 3 | S | SI5 | 2 | I |
| SE13 | SE8 | SE16 | SW5 | SE4 | 0 | SF3 | 0 | SI3 | 1 | SS4 | 0 | SW9 | 0 | SI23 | 1 | E | SE14 | Singleton | E | SF10 | 2 | F |
| SE14 | SE11 | SE21 | SE5 | 27 | SF4 | 0 | SI5 | 1 | SS5 | 0 | SE16 | 10 | E | SI8 | 11 | I | ||||||
| SI22 | SE18 | SE22 | SE7 | 29 | SF5 | 0 | SI7 | 0 | SS6 | 0 | SF11 | 10 | F | SF6 | 11 | F | ||||||
| SS3 | SE19 | SF3 | SE8 | 22 | SF6 | 1 | SI8 | 1 | SS7 | 0 | SE10 | 10 | E | |||||||||
| SS9 | SE20 | SF6 | SE10 | 0 | SF10 | 1 | SI22 | 0 | SS8 | 0 | SF3 | 10 | F | |||||||||
| SW9 | SE24 | SF10 | SE11 | 22 | SF11 | 0 | SI23 | 0 | SS9 | 4 | SE1 | 10 | E | |||||||||
| SF1* | SF11 | SE13 | 0 | SS10 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
| SF2 | SI3 | SE14 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SF4 | SI5 | SE16 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SF5 | SI8 | SE18 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SI1* | SI23 | SE19 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SI2 | SE20 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SS1* | SE21 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SS4* | SE22 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SS5 | SE24 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SS6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| SS7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| SS8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| SS10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 3Linear whole-genome representation of phage SE13. Large open reading frames (ORFs) greater than 1000 bp are indicated. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription.
Figure 4Linear whole genome comparison of phages in Cluster 3. ORFs encoding for DNA replication elements are indicated. Grey regions indicate nucleotide homology of >96%. Directions indicate the direction of transcription.