Literature DB >> 31539590

Implicit temporal predictability enhances pitch discrimination sensitivity and biases the phase of delta oscillations in auditory cortex.

Sophie K Herbst1, Jonas Obleser2.   

Abstract

Can human listeners use implicit temporal contingencies in auditory input to form temporal predictions, and if so, how are these predictions represented endogenously? To assess this question, we implicitly manipulated temporal predictability in an auditory pitch discrimination task: unbeknownst to participants, the pitch of the standard tone could either be deterministically predictive of the temporal onset of the target tone, or convey no predictive information. Predictive and non-predictive conditions were presented interleaved in one stream, and separated by variable inter-stimulus intervals such that there was no dominant stimulus rhythm throughout. Even though participants were unaware of the implicit temporal contingencies, pitch discrimination sensitivity (the slope of the psychometric function) increased when the onset of the target tone was predictable in time (N = 49, 28 female, 21 male). Concurrently recorded EEG data (N = 24) revealed that standard tones that conveyed temporal predictions evoked a more negative N1 component than non-predictive standards. We observed no significant differences in oscillatory power or phase coherence between conditions during the foreperiod. Importantly, the phase angle of delta oscillations (1-3 Hz) in auditory areas in the post-standard and pre-target time windows predicted behavioral pitch discrimination sensitivity. This suggests that temporal predictions are encoded in delta oscillatory phase during the foreperiod interval. In sum, we show that auditory perception benefits from implicit temporal contingencies, and provide evidence for a role of slow neural oscillations in the endogenous representation of temporal predictions, in absence of exogenously driven entrainment to rhythmic input.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31539590     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Integrating when and what information in the left parietal lobe allows language rule generalization.

Authors:  Joan Orpella; Pablo Ripollés; Manuela Ruzzoli; Julià L Amengual; Alicia Callejas; Anna Martinez-Alvarez; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Ruth de Diego-Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Authors:  Ruud L van den Brink; Peter R Murphy; Kobe Desender; Nicole de Ru; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Oscillatory entrainment mechanisms and anticipatory predictive processes in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shlomit Beker; John J Foxe; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19.

Authors:  Maximilien Chaumon; Pier-Alexandre Rioux; Sophie K Herbst; Ignacio Spiousas; Sebastian L Kübel; Elisa M Gallego Hiroyasu; Şerife Leman Runyun; Luigi Micillo; Vassilis Thanopoulos; Esteban Mendoza-Duran; Anna Wagelmans; Ramya Mudumba; Ourania Tachmatzidou; Nicola Cellini; Arnaud D'Argembeau; Anne Giersch; Simon Grondin; Claude Gronfier; Federico Alvarez Igarzábal; André Klarsfeld; Ljubica Jovanovic; Rodrigo Laje; Elisa Lannelongue; Giovanna Mioni; Cyril Nicolaï; Narayanan Srinivasan; Shogo Sugiyama; Marc Wittmann; Yuko Yotsumoto; Argiro Vatakis; Fuat Balcı; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Research outside the laboratory: Longitudinal at-home neurostimulation.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Carson C Smith; Adam Gazzaley; Theodore P Zanto
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Musical rhythm effects on visual attention are non-rhythmical: evidence against metrical entrainment.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Maria Wijaya; Man Hey Chiu; Burkhard Maess; Thomas C Gunter
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits.

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Merle Fairhurst; Annett Schirmer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Oscillatory correlates of auditory working memory examined with human electrocorticography.

Authors:  Sukhbinder Kumar; Phillip E Gander; Joel I Berger; Alexander J Billig; Kirill V Nourski; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Implicit learning of temporal behavior in complex dynamic environments.

Authors:  Josh M Salet; Wouter Kruijne; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

10.  Preferred auditory temporal processing regimes and auditory-motor synchronization.

Authors:  Pius Kern; M Florencia Assaneo; Dominik Endres; David Poeppel; Johanna M Rimmele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.