Literature DB >> 32507877

Musical rhythm effects on visual attention are non-rhythmical: evidence against metrical entrainment.

Annett Schirmer1,2, Maria Wijaya1, Man Hey Chiu1, Burkhard Maess3, Thomas C Gunter3.   

Abstract

The idea that external rhythms synchronize attention cross-modally has attracted much interest and scientific inquiry. Yet, whether associated attentional modulations are indeed rhythmical in that they spring from and map onto an underlying meter has not been clearly established. Here we tested this idea while addressing the shortcomings of previous work associated with confounding (i) metricality and regularity, (ii) rhythmic and temporal expectations or (iii) global and local temporal effects. We designed sound sequences that varied orthogonally (high/low) in metricality and regularity and presented them as task-irrelevant auditory background in four separate blocks. The participants' task was to detect rare visual targets occurring at a silent metrically aligned or misaligned temporal position. We found that target timing was irrelevant for reaction times and visual event-related potentials. High background regularity and to a lesser extent metricality facilitated target processing across metrically aligned and misaligned positions. Additionally, high regularity modulated auditory background frequencies in the EEG recorded over occipital cortex. We conclude that external rhythms, rather than synchronizing attention cross-modally, confer general, nontemporal benefits. Their predictability conserves processing resources that then benefit stimulus representations in other modalities.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; entrainment; foreperiod; frequency tagging; music; tapping; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32507877      PMCID: PMC7812633          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  62 in total

Review 1.  Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Peter Lakatos; Pamela D Butler; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.

Authors:  Maria Mittag; Rika Takegata; István Winkler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  EEG Frequency-Tagging and Input-Output Comparison in Rhythm Perception.

Authors:  Sylvie Nozaradan; Peter E Keller; Bruno Rossion; André Mouraux
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  A common probabilistic framework for perceptual and statistical learning.

Authors:  József Fiser; Gábor Lengyel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Beat-based and Memory-based Temporal Expectations in Rhythm: Similar Perceptual Effects, Different Underlying Mechanisms.

Authors:  Fleur L Bouwer; Henkjan Honing; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  On the benefits of using surface Laplacian (current source density) methodology in electrophysiology.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Temporal expectations and neural amplitude fluctuations in auditory cortex interactively influence perception.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Saskia Haegens; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain.

Authors:  Jessica A Grahn; Matthew Brett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Detecting Temporal Change in Dynamic Sounds: On the Role of Stimulus Duration, Speed, and Emotion.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Nicolas Escoffier; Xiaoqin Cheng; Yenju Feng; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-13
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits.

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Merle Fairhurst; Annett Schirmer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Being 'in sync'-is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Merle Fairhurst; Stefanie Hoehl
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.