Literature DB >> 31532498

Assessing Toxicokinetic Uncertainty and Variability in Risk Prioritization.

John F Wambaugh1, Barbara A Wetmore2, Caroline L Ring1,3,4, Chantel I Nicolas1,3,5, Robert G Pearce1,3, Gregory S Honda1,3, Roger Dinallo6, Derek Angus6, Jon Gilbert6, Teresa Sierra6, Akshay Badrinarayanan6, Bradley Snodgrass6, Adam Brockman6, Chris Strock6, R Woodrow Setzer1, Russell S Thomas1.   

Abstract

High(er) throughput toxicokinetics (HTTK) encompasses in vitro measures of key determinants of chemical toxicokinetics and reverse dosimetry approaches for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). With HTTK, the bioactivity identified by any in vitro assay can be converted to human equivalent doses and compared with chemical intake estimates. Biological variability in HTTK has been previously considered, but the relative impact of measurement uncertainty has not. Bayesian methods were developed to provide chemical-specific uncertainty estimates for 2 in vitro toxicokinetic parameters: unbound fraction in plasma (fup) and intrinsic hepatic clearance (Clint). New experimental measurements of fup and Clint are reported for 418 and 467 chemicals, respectively. These data raise the HTTK chemical coverage of the ToxCast Phase I and II libraries to 57%. Although the standard protocol for Clint was followed, a revised protocol for fup measured unbound chemical at 10%, 30%, and 100% of physiologic plasma protein concentrations, allowing estimation of protein binding affinity. This protocol reduced the occurrence of chemicals with fup too low to measure from 44% to 9.1%. Uncertainty in fup was also reduced, with the median coefficient of variation dropping from 0.4 to 0.1. Monte Carlo simulation was used to propagate both measurement uncertainty and biological variability into IVIVE. The uncertainty propagation techniques used here also allow incorporation of other sources of uncertainty such as in silico predictors of HTTK parameters. These methods have the potential to inform risk-based prioritization based on the relationship between in vitro bioactivities and exposures. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; IVIVE; high throughput; toxicokinetics; uncertainty; variability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31532498      PMCID: PMC8136471          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  59 in total

Review 1.  High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century.

Authors:  R P Hertzberg; A J Pope
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  The Simcyp population-based ADME simulator.

Authors:  Masoud Jamei; Steve Marciniak; Kairui Feng; Adrian Barnett; Geoffrey Tucker; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Evaluation of simple in vitro to in vivo extrapolation approaches for environmental compounds.

Authors:  Miyoung Yoon; Alina Efremenko; Bas J Blaauboer; Harvey J Clewell
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Pathology Harmony; a pragmatic and scientific approach to unfounded variation in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Jonathan Berg; Vanessa Lane
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.057

5.  Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Robert Pearce; Cory Strope; Rocky Goldsmith; James P Sluka; Alexander Sedykh; Alex Tropsha; Sieto Bosgra; Imran Shah; Richard Judson; Russell S Thomas; R Woodrow Setzer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Deriving an explicit hepatic clearance equation accounting for plasma protein binding and hepatocellular uptake.

Authors:  Miyoung Yoon; Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Christopher M Grulke; Patra Volarath; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Matthew T Martin; John F Wambaugh; Thomas B Knudsen; Jayaram Kancherla; Kamel Mansouri; Grace Patlewicz; Antony J Williams; Stephen B Little; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans.

Authors:  B Davies; T Morris
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Prediction of hepatic clearance and availability by cryopreserved human hepatocytes: an application of serum incubation method.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Shibata; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Masato Chiba; Yasuyuki Ishii
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Variability of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model parameters and their effects on PBPK model predictions in a risk assessment for perchloroethylene (PCE).

Authors:  J M Gearhart; D A Mahle; R J Greene; C S Seckel; C D Flemming; J W Fisher; H J Clewell
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.372

View more
  11 in total

1.  Practical application of the interim internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC): a case study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Najjar; Corie A Ellison; Sebastien Gregoire; Nicola J Hewitt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.168

2.  Towards best use and regulatory acceptance of generic physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Najjar; Ans Punt; John Wambaugh; Alicia Paini; Corie Ellison; Styliani Fragki; Enrica Bianchi; Fagen Zhang; Joost Westerhout; Dennis Mueller; Hequn Li; Quan Shi; Timothy W Gant; Phil Botham; Rémi Bars; Aldert Piersma; Ben van Ravenzwaay; Nynke I Kramer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 3.  IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Chang; Yu-Mei Tan; David G Allen; Shannon Bell; Paul C Brown; Lauren Browning; Patricia Ceger; Jeffery Gearhart; Pertti J Hakkinen; Shruti V Kabadi; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Annie Lumen; Joanna Matheson; Alicia Paini; Heather A Pangburn; Elijah J Petersen; Emily N Reinke; Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Nisha Sipes; Lisa M Sweeney; John F Wambaugh; Ronald Wange; Barbara A Wetmore; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-01

4.  Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors.

Authors:  Daniel E Dawson; Brandall L Ingle; Katherine A Phillips; John W Nichols; John F Wambaugh; Rogelio Tornero-Velez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Risk-Based Chemical Ranking and Generating a Prioritized Human Exposome Database.

Authors:  Fanrong Zhao; Li Li; Yue Chen; Yichao Huang; Tharushi Prabha Keerthisinghe; Agnes Chow; Ting Dong; Shenglan Jia; Shipei Xing; Benedikt Warth; Tao Huan; Mingliang Fang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Predictive Performance of Next Generation Physiologically Based Kinetic (PBK) Model Predictions in Rats Based on In Vitro and In Silico Input Data.

Authors:  Ans Punt; Jochem Louisse; Nicole Pinckaers; Eric Fabian; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation by Physiologically Based Kinetic Modeling: Experience With Three Case Studies and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Engi Abdelhady Algharably; Emma Di Consiglio; Emanuela Testai; Francesca Pistollato; Hans Mielke; Ursula Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-18

8.  Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow.

Authors:  Alistair M Middleton; Joe Reynolds; Sophie Cable; Maria Teresa Baltazar; Hequn Li; Samantha Bevan; Paul L Carmichael; Matthew Philip Dent; Sarah Hatherell; Jade Houghton; Predrag Kukic; Mark Liddell; Sophie Malcomber; Beate Nicol; Benjamin Park; Hiral Patel; Sharon Scott; Chris Sparham; Paul Walker; Andrew White
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.109

9.  SimRFlow: An R-based workflow for automated high-throughput PBPK simulation with the Simcyp® simulator.

Authors:  Hiba Khalidi; Anthonia Onasanwo; Barira Islam; Heeseung Jo; Ciarán Fisher; Rich Aidley; Iain Gardner; Frederic Y Bois
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 10.  New Approach Methods to Evaluate Health Risks of Air Pollutants: Critical Design Considerations for In Vitro Exposure Testing.

Authors:  Jose Zavala; Anastasia N Freedman; John T Szilagyi; Ilona Jaspers; John F Wambaugh; Mark Higuchi; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.