Literature DB >> 36149470

Practical application of the interim internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC): a case study based on clinical data.

Abdulkarim Najjar1, Corie A Ellison2, Sebastien Gregoire3, Nicola J Hewitt4.   

Abstract

We present a case study that provides a practical step-by-step example of how the internal Threshold of Toxicological Concern (iTTC) can be used as a tool to refine a TTC-based assessment for dermal exposures to consumer products. The case study uses a theoretical scenario where there are no systemic toxicity data for the case study chemicals (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, homosalate, octisalate, octinoxate, and ecamsule). Human dermal pharmacokinetic data following single and repeat dermal exposure to products containing the case study chemicals were obtained from data published by the US FDA. The clinical studies utilized an application procedure that followed maximal use conditions (product applied as 2 mg/cm2 to 75% of the body surface area, 4 times a day). The case study chemicals were first reviewed to determine if they were in the applicability domain of the iTTC, and then, the human plasma concentrations were compared to an iTTC limit of 1 µM. When assessed under maximum usage, the external exposure of all chemicals exceeded the external dose TTC limits. By contrast, the internal exposure to all chemicals, except oxybenzone, was an order of magnitude lower than the 1 µM interim iTTC threshold. This work highlights the importance of understanding internal exposure relative to external dose and how the iTTC can be a valuable tool for assessing low-level internal exposures; additionally, the work demonstrates how to use an iTTC, and highlights considerations and refinement opportunities for the approach.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cosmetics ingredients; Decision tree; Dermal exposure; PBPK; Risk assessment; Systemic toxicity; UV filter; iTTC

Year:  2022        PMID: 36149470     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03371-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   6.168


  29 in total

1.  Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model.

Authors:  Patience Browne; Richard S Judson; Warren M Casey; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Challenges in working towards an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC) for use in the safety assessment of cosmetics: Discussions from the Cosmetics Europe iTTC Working Group workshop.

Authors:  Corie A Ellison; Karen L Blackburn; Paul L Carmichael; Harvey J Clewell; Mark T D Cronin; Bertrand Desprez; Sylvia E Escher; Steve S Ferguson; Sébastien Grégoire; Nicola J Hewitt; Heli M Hollnagel; Martina Klaric; Atish Patel; Sabrina Salhi; Andreas Schepky; Barbara G Schmitt; John F Wambaugh; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  An interim internal Threshold of Toxicologic Concern (iTTC) for chemicals in consumer products, with support from an automated assessment of ToxCast™ dose response data.

Authors:  Karen L Blackburn; Gregory Carr; Jane L Rose; Bastian G Selman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  Half-lives of tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats, monkeys, and humans--a critical review.

Authors:  Harald J Geyer; Karl-Werner Schramm; Ernst Anton Feicht; Akbar Behechti; Christian Steinberg; Rainer Brüggemann; Hermann Poiger; Bernhard Henkelmann; Antonius Kettrup
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  The role of fit-for-purpose assays within tiered testing approaches: A case study evaluating prioritized estrogen-active compounds in an in vitro human uterotrophic assay.

Authors:  Tyler Beames; Marjory Moreau; L Avery Roberts; Kamel Mansouri; Saad Haider; Marci Smeltz; Chantel I Nicolas; Daniel Doheny; Martin B Phillips; Miyoung Yoon; Richard A Becker; Patrick D McMullen; Melvin E Andersen; Rebecca A Clewell; Jessica K Hartman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  In vitro metabolism of sunscreen compounds by liquid chromatography/high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amal Guesmi; Leanne Ohlund; Lekha Sleno
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Elimination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in occupationally exposed persons.

Authors:  D Flesch-Janys; H Becher; P Gurn; D Jung; J Konietzko; A Manz; O Päpke
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1996-03

8.  Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis using human hepatocytes and liver S-9 fraction.

Authors:  Jonathon N Bauman; Joan M Kelly; Sakambari Tripathy; Sabrina X Zhao; Wing W Lam; Amit S Kalgutkar; R Scott Obach
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Internal Threshold of Toxicological Concern (iTTC): Where We Are Today and What Is Possible in the Near Future.

Authors:  Corie A Ellison; Anne Marie Api; Richard A Becker; Alina Y Efremenko; Sanket Gadhia; C Eric Hack; Nicola J Hewitt; Mustafa Varcin; Andreas Schepky
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-15

10.  The margin of internal exposure (MOIE) concept for dermal risk assessment based on oral toxicity data - A case study with caffeine.

Authors:  Jos G M Bessems; Alicia Paini; Monika Gajewska; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.