Literature DB >> 25108889

Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.

Fritz H Schröder1, Jonas Hugosson2, Monique J Roobol3, Teuvo L J Tammela4, Marco Zappa5, Vera Nelen6, Maciej Kwiatkowski7, Marcos Lujan8, Liisa Määttänen9, Hans Lilja10, Louis J Denis11, Franz Recker12, Alvaro Paez13, Chris H Bangma3, Sigrid Carlsson14, Donella Puliti5, Arnauld Villers15, Xavier Rebillard16, Matti Hakama17, Ulf-Hakan Stenman18, Paula Kujala19, Kimmo Taari20, Gunnar Aus21, Andreas Huber22, Theo H van der Kwast23, Ron H N van Schaik24, Harry J de Koning25, Sue M Moss26, Anssi Auvinen27.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown significant reductions in prostate cancer mortality after 9 years and 11 years of follow-up, but screening is controversial because of adverse events such as overdiagnosis. We provide updated results of mortality from prostate cancer with follow-up to 2010, with analyses truncated at 9, 11, and 13 years.
METHODS: ERSPC is a multicentre, randomised trial with a predefined centralised database, analysis plan, and core age group (55-69 years), which assesses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in eight European countries. Eligible men aged 50-74 years were identified from population registries and randomly assigned by computer generated random numbers to screening or no intervention (control). Investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality in the core age group. Analysis was by intention to treat. We did a secondary analysis that corrected for selection bias due to non-participation. Only incidence and no mortality data at 9 years' follow-up are reported for the French centres. This study is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN49127736.
FINDINGS: With data truncated at 13 years of follow-up, 7408 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the intervention group and 6107 cases in the control group. The rate ratio of prostate cancer incidence between the intervention and control groups was 1·91 (95% CI 1·83-1·99) after 9 years (1·64 [1·58-1·69] including France), 1·66 (1·60-1·73) after 11 years, and 1·57 (1·51-1·62) after 13 years. The rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality was 0·85 (0·70-1·03) after 9 years, 0·78 (0·66-0·91) after 11 years, and 0·79 (0·69-0·91) at 13 years. The absolute risk reduction of death from prostate cancer at 13 years was 0·11 per 1000 person-years or 1·28 per 1000 men randomised, which is equivalent to one prostate cancer death averted per 781 (95% CI 490-1929) men invited for screening or one per 27 (17-66) additional prostate cancer detected. After adjustment for non-participation, the rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality in men screened was 0·73 (95% CI 0·61-0·88).
INTERPRETATION: In this update the ERSPC confirms a substantial reduction in prostate cancer mortality attributable to testing of PSA, with a substantially increased absolute effect at 13 years compared with findings after 9 and 11 years. Despite our findings, further quantification of harms and their reduction are still considered a prerequisite for the introduction of populated-based screening. FUNDING: Each centre had its own funding responsibility.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25108889      PMCID: PMC4427906          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  27 in total

1.  Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  J Cuzick; R Edwards; N Segnan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Elisabeth M Wever; Anssi Auvinen; Jonas Hugosson; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Arnauld Villers; Alvaro Páez; Sue M Moss; Marco Zappa; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tuukka Mäkinen; Sigrid Carlsson; Ida J Korfage; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Suzie J Otto; Gerrit Draisma; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Ann W Hsing; Grant Izmirlian; Paul F Pinsky; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC.

Authors:  Tineke Wolters; Monique J Roobol; Ewout W Steyerberg; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Chris H Bangma; Jonas Hugosson; Stefano Ciatto; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Arnauld Villers; Marcos Luján; Vera Nelen; Teuvo L J Tammela; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer--the Rotterdam pilot studies.

Authors:  F H Shröder; R A Damhuis; W J Kirkels; H J De Koning; R Kranse; H G Nus; B G Blijenberg
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-01-17       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Progress report of Antwerp and Rotterdam pilot studies.

Authors:  F H Schröder; L J Denis; W Kirkels; H J de Koning; B Standaert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Assessment of causes of death in a prostate cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Tuukka Mäkinen; Pekka Karhunen; Jussi Aro; Jorma Lahtela; Liisa Määttänen; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Serum concentrations of prostate specific antigen and its complex with alpha 1-antichymotrypsin before diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  U H Stenman; M Hakama; P Knekt; A Aromaa; L Teppo; J Leinonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P H Gann; C H Hennekens; M J Stampfer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  431 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Prostate cancer: Personalized risk - stratified screening or abandoning it altogether?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  [Principles and fields of application of screening procedures].

Authors:  M Blettner; C Spix
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Yaw A Nyame; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Jim C Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Principles of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Roman Gulati; Sue M Moss; Jonas Hugosson; Paul F Pinsky; Christine D Berg; Anssi Auvinen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; E David Crawford; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marco Zappa; Marcos Luján; Arnauld Villers; Tiago M de Carvalho; Eric J Feuer; Alex Tsodikov; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical Consultation Guide: How to Optimize the Use of Prostate-specific Antigen in the Current Era.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2015-06-09

9.  Age-related urologic problems in the complex urologic patient.

Authors:  Nicholas Faure Walker; Bradley Gill; Jonathan Olsburgh; David Gillatt; Tet Yap; Lina Michala; Claire Taylor; Hadley Wood; Dan Wood
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Redesigning Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies to Reduce Overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.