Shubhanchi Nigam1, Lauren McCarl2, Rajeev Kumar2, Robert S Edinger1, Brenda F Kurland3, Carolyn J Anderson1,4,5,6, Ashok Panigrahy1, Gary Kohanbash7,8, W Barry Edwards9,10. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 6. Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. gary.kohanbash2@chp.edu. 8. Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. gary.kohanbash2@chp.edu. 9. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. edwardsw@upmc.edu. 10. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. edwardsw@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma is a lethal brain tumor, heavily infiltrated by tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMCs). TAMCs are emerging as a promising therapeutic target as they suppress anti-tumor immune responses and promote tumor cell growth. Quantifying TAMCs using non-invasive immunoPET could facilitate patient stratification for TAMC-targeted treatments and monitoring of treatment efficacy. As TAMCs uniformly express the cell surface marker, integrin CD11b, we evaluated a Zr-89 labeled anti-CD11b antibody for non-invasive imaging of TAMCs in a syngeneic orthotopic mouse glioma model. PROCEDURES: A human/mouse cross-reactive anti-CD11b antibody (clone M1/70) was conjugated to a DFO chelator and radiolabeled with Zr-89. PET/CT and biodistribution with or without a blocking dose of anti-CD11b Ab were performed 72 h post-injection (p.i.) of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab in mice bearing established orthotopic syngeneic GL261 gliomas and in non tumor-bearing mice. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry of dissected GL261 tumors were conducted to confirm the presence of CD11b+ TAMCs. RESULTS: Significant uptake of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab was detected at the tumor site (SUVmean = 2.60 ± 0.24) compared with the contralateral hemisphere (SUVmean = 0.6 ± 0.11). Blocking with a 10-fold lower specific activity of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab markedly reduced the SUV in the right brain (SUVmean = 0.11 ± 0.06), demonstrating specificity. Spleen and lymph nodes (myeloid cell rich organs) also showed high uptake of the tracer, and biodistribution analysis correlated with the imaging results. CD11b expression within the tumor was validated using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, which showed high CD11b expression primarily in the tumoral hemisphere compared with the contralateral hemisphere with very minimal accumulation in non tumor-bearing brain. CONCLUSION: These data establish that [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab immunoPET targets CD11b+ cells (TAMCs) with high specificity in a mouse model of GBM, demonstrating the potential for non-invasive quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD11b+ immune cells during disease progression and immunotherapy in patients with GBM.
PURPOSE:Glioblastoma is a lethal brain tumor, heavily infiltrated by tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMCs). TAMCs are emerging as a promising therapeutic target as they suppress anti-tumor immune responses and promote tumor cell growth. Quantifying TAMCs using non-invasive immunoPET could facilitate patient stratification for TAMC-targeted treatments and monitoring of treatment efficacy. As TAMCs uniformly express the cell surface marker, integrin CD11b, we evaluated a Zr-89 labeled anti-CD11b antibody for non-invasive imaging of TAMCs in a syngeneic orthotopic mouseglioma model. PROCEDURES: A human/mouse cross-reactive anti-CD11b antibody (clone M1/70) was conjugated to a DFO chelator and radiolabeled with Zr-89. PET/CT and biodistribution with or without a blocking dose of anti-CD11b Ab were performed 72 h post-injection (p.i.) of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab in mice bearing established orthotopic syngeneic GL261gliomas and in non tumor-bearing mice. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry of dissected GL261tumors were conducted to confirm the presence of CD11b+ TAMCs. RESULTS: Significant uptake of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab was detected at the tumor site (SUVmean = 2.60 ± 0.24) compared with the contralateral hemisphere (SUVmean = 0.6 ± 0.11). Blocking with a 10-fold lower specific activity of [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab markedly reduced the SUV in the right brain (SUVmean = 0.11 ± 0.06), demonstrating specificity. Spleen and lymph nodes (myeloid cell rich organs) also showed high uptake of the tracer, and biodistribution analysis correlated with the imaging results. CD11b expression within the tumor was validated using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, which showed high CD11b expression primarily in the tumoral hemisphere compared with the contralateral hemisphere with very minimal accumulation in non tumor-bearing brain. CONCLUSION: These data establish that [89Zr]anti-CD11b Ab immunoPET targets CD11b+ cells (TAMCs) with high specificity in a mouse model of GBM, demonstrating the potential for non-invasive quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD11b+ immune cells during disease progression and immunotherapy in patients with GBM.
Authors: Diana Cantero; Ángel Rodríguez de Lope; Raquel Moreno de la Presa; Juan M Sepúlveda; José M Borrás; Javier S Castresana; Nicky D'Haene; Juan F García; Isabelle Salmon; Manuela Mollejo; Juan A Rey; Aurelio Hernández-Laín; Bárbara Meléndez Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Joseph P Antonios; Horacio Soto; Richard G Everson; Diana Moughon; Joey R Orpilla; Namjo P Shin; Shaina Sedighim; Janet Treger; Sylvia Odesa; Alexander Tucker; William H Yong; Gang Li; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Robert M Prins Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: David A Reardon; Prafulla C Gokhale; Sarah R Klein; Keith L Ligon; Scott J Rodig; Shakti H Ramkissoon; Kristen L Jones; Amy Saur Conway; Xiaoyun Liao; Jun Zhou; Patrick Y Wen; Annick D Van Den Abbeele; F Stephen Hodi; Lei Qin; Nancy E Kohl; Arlene H Sharpe; Glenn Dranoff; Gordon J Freeman Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Mohammad Rashidian; Edmund J Keliher; Angelina M Bilate; Joao N Duarte; Gregory R Wojtkiewicz; Johanne Tracey Jacobsen; Juanjo Cragnolini; Lee Kim Swee; Gabriel D Victora; Ralph Weissleder; Hidde L Ploegh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephanie M Pyonteck; Leila Akkari; Alberto J Schuhmacher; Robert L Bowman; Lisa Sevenich; Daniela F Quail; Oakley C Olson; Marsha L Quick; Jason T Huse; Virginia Teijeiro; Manu Setty; Christina S Leslie; Yoko Oei; Alicia Pedraza; Jianan Zhang; Cameron W Brennan; James C Sutton; Eric C Holland; Dylan Daniel; Johanna A Joyce Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Debebe Theodros; Andrew S Luksik; Russell Maxwell; Eileen Kim; Christopher M Jackson; Zineb Belcaid; Sudipto Ganguly; Betty Tyler; Henry Brem; Drew M Pardoll; Michael Lim Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-17
Authors: Poorva Jain; Aisling M Chaney; Mackenzie L Carlson; Isaac M Jackson; Anoushka Rao; Michelle L James Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Cristina Barca; Claudia Foray; Bastian Zinnhardt; Alexandra Winkeler; Ulrich Herrlinger; Oliver M Grauer; Andreas H Jacobs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Claudia Foray; Silvia Valtorta; Cristina Barca; Alexandra Winkeler; Wolfgang Roll; Michael Müther; Stefan Wagner; Miranda L Gardner; Sven Hermann; Michael Schäfers; Oliver Martin Grauer; Rosa Maria Moresco; Bastian Zinnhardt; Andreas H Jacobs Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 11.556