Literature DB >> 31528482

Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications.

Ravi Sharma1, Sachin A Borkar1, Revanth Goda1, Shashank S Kale1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing laminoplasty develop postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine despite sufficient preoperative lordosis. This results in poor surgical outcomes.
METHODS: Here, we reviewed the relationship between multiple radiological parameters of cervical alignment that correlated with postoperative loss of cervical lordosis in patients undergoing laminoplasty.
RESULTS: Patient with a high T1 slope (T1S) has more lordotic alignment of the cervical spine preoperatively and is at increased risk for the loss of cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty. Those with lower values of difference between T1S and Cobb's angle (T1S-CL) and CL-T1S ratio have higher risks of developing a loss of the cervical lordosis postoperatively. Alternatively, C2-C7 lordosis, neck tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis had no role in predicting the postlaminoplasty kyphosis.
CONCLUSION: Among various radiological parameters, the preoperative T1S is the most important factor in predicting the postoperative loss of the cervical lordosis/alignment following laminoplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2-C3 disc angle; C2-C7 Cobb’s angle; C2-C7 lordosis; C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis; Cervical laminoplasty; Loss of cervical lordosis; T1 slope

Year:  2019        PMID: 31528482      PMCID: PMC6744746          DOI: 10.25259/SNI_339_2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Although laminectomy has better long-term clinical and radiological outcomes, laminoplasty is still favored for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy as it preserves the cervical range of motion (ROM) with a lower risk of postoperative kyphosis.[3,14-17]. Despite an adequate preoperative cervical lordosis, increases in the T1 slope (T1S) may result in postlaminoplasty kyphosis.[1,2,4-6] Here, we highlight the relationship between T1S and other radiological indicators of cervical alignment and correlate these with postlaminoplasty kyphosis/loss of lordosis.

METHODS

Measures of cervical alignment

Multiple studies have described various indices that help predict the risk of loss of cervical lordosis in postlaminoplasty patients [Table 1, Figure 1].[9,11-13]
Table 1:

Description of indices affecting cervical alignment.

Figure 1:

The lateral X-ray of cervical spine showing various radiological measurements.

Description of indices affecting cervical alignment. The lateral X-ray of cervical spine showing various radiological measurements.

RESULTS

T1S

The T1S is one of the most important indices that can help predict the postlaminoplasty loss of cervical lordosis. Notably, the preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb’s angle) was greater in patients with higher T1S versus those with lower T1S; these patients have a higher risk of kyphosis postlaminoplasty.[2,5-7,18] Lee et al.[10] concluded that patients with a T1S of >29° are more likely to exhibit postlaminoplasty kyphosis/loss of lordosis of more than 5° versus those with T1S of <29°.

C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Several studies have shown that the preoperative C2-C7 SVA had no significant correlation with the postlaminoplasty loss of cervical lordosis.[2,5,6,18] Alternatively, Zhang et al.[18] concluded that C2-C7 SVA was positively correlated with loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.[2,5,6,18] Lin et al.[13] showed the combined effect of T1S and C2-C7 SVA on predicting loss of cervical lordosis. Patient with low T1S (≤20°) and large C2-C7 SVA (>22 mm) surprisingly had an increased cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty.

Other factors are predictive of postlaminoplasty kyphosis

There are multiple other factors that predict postlaminoplasty kyphosis. Li et al.[11] concluded that patients with high Cobb’s angle-T1S ratio (CL/T1S) have a higher risk of kyphosis versus those with low CL/T1S. Kim et al.[5] and Zhang et al.[18] showed no relationship between cervical ROM and the risk for postoperative kyphosis. Similar to cervical ROM, neck tilt (NT) a measure of cervical spine tilt with respect to sternum, also does not predict the loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.[6] Thoracic kyphosis (TK) is, however, directly related to cervical lordosis.[8] Cephalad vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty has also emerged as a new risk factor for loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.

CONCLUSION

A high T1S and C2-C7 SVA are the most predictive factors for postlaminoplasty kyphosis. Those risk factors that do not contribute to this include; (1) the preoperative C2-C7 lordosis, NT, cervical ROM, and TK.
  18 in total

1.  Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy.

Authors:  S Matsunaga; T Sakou; K Nakanisi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Eun-Seok Son; Eun-Min Seo; Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  A Seichi; K Takeshita; I Ohishi; H Kawaguchi; T Akune; Y Anamizu; T Kitagawa; K Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty?

Authors:  Jae Hwan Cho; Jung-Ki Ha; Dae Geun Kim; Keum-Young Song; Yung-Tae Kim; Chang Ju Hwang; Choon Sung Lee; Dong-Ho Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Ryan M Kretzer; Wesley Hsu; Nianbin Hu; Hidemasa Umekoji; George I Jallo; Paul C McAfee; P Justin Tortolani; Bryan W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Myoarchitectonic spinolaminoplasty: efficacy in reconstituting the cervical musculature and preserving biomechanical function.

Authors:  Phyo Kim; Hidetoshi Murata; Ryu Kurokawa; Yoshiyuki Takaishi; Keizo Asakuno; Toshiki Kawamoto
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-09

8.  Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Masahiko Kanamori; Hirokazu Ishihara; Kazuo Ohmori; Hiroshi Nakamura; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Tae-Hwan Kim; Seung Yeop Lee; Yong Chan Kim; Moon Soo Park; Seok Woo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cervical Spinal Alignment Change Accompanying Spondylosis Exposes Harmonization Failure with Total Spinal Balance: A Japanese Cohort Survey Randomly Sampled from a Basic Resident Registry.

Authors:  Shota Ikegami; Masashi Uehara; Ryosuke Tokida; Hikaru Nishimura; Noriko Sakai; Hiroshi Horiuchi; Hiroyuki Kato; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.