Literature DB >> 22228326

Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Ryan M Kretzer1, Wesley Hsu, Nianbin Hu, Hidemasa Umekoji, George I Jallo, Paul C McAfee, P Justin Tortolani, Bryan W Cunningham.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This in vitro human cadaveric study measured adjacent-level kinematics after posterior cervical decompression and fixation.
OBJECTIVE: Quantify adjacent-level changes in range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal length of instrumentation after posterior decompression is unclear. Longer posterior cervical fixation constructs may increase the risk of adjacent-segment degeneration.
METHODS: Eight cervicothoracic spines were evaluated intact, with C3-C6 laminectomy, C3-C6 laminectomy + C3-C6 fixation, C3-C6 laminectomy + C3-C7 fixation, C3-C7 laminectomy, C3-C7 laminectomy + C3-C7 fixation, C3-C7 laminectomy + C2-C7 fixation, C3-C7 laminectomy + C3-T2 fixation, and C3-C7 laminectomy + C2-T2 fixation. Testing included intact moments (± 2.0 N·m) in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, with quantification of ROM at C2-C3, C6-C7, and C7-T1 normalized to the intact spine. Intradiscal pressures were also measured at each level.
RESULTS: For the C3-C6 laminectomy group, there were no differences in adjacent-level flexion/extension ROM or intradiscal pressure based on construct length, except at C6-C7, where ROM was significantly decreased when fixation was extended to C7 (P < 0.05). After C3-C7 laminectomy and reconstruction, the greatest increase in C2-C3 flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure occurred in the C3-T2 fixation subgroup (ROM: 348% [P < 0.05]; intradiscal pressure: 319 ± 243 psi [pounds per square inch] vs. 65 ± 41 psi intact [P < 0.05]). At C7-T1, the greatest increase in flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure occurred after C2-C7 fixation (ROM: 531% [P < 0.05]; intradiscal pressure: 152 ± 83 psi vs. 21 ± 14 psi intact [P < 0.05]).
CONCLUSION: For C3-C6 laminectomy, instrumentation to C7 significantly decreased flexion/extension ROM and intradiscal pressure at C6-C7 without significantly increasing either measure at C2-C3 or C7-T1 relative to C3-C6 fixation. In the setting of a C3-C7 laminectomy, when instrumenting to either C2 or T2, consideration should be given to including both levels within these constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228326     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824780b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Jun Ming Cao; Fan Tao Meng; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  In Vitro Biomechanics of Human Cadaveric Cervical Spines With Mature Fusion.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Phillip M Reyes; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Total disc replacement alters the biomechanics of cervical spine based on sagittal cervical alignment: A finite element study.

Authors:  Muzammil Mumtaz; Justin Mendoza; Sudharshan Tripathi; Amey Kelkar; Norihiro Nishida; Ashish Sahai; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

Review 4.  Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review.

Authors:  Intekhab Alam; Ravi Sharma; Sachin A Borkar; Revanth Goda; Varidh Katiyar; Shashank S Kale
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-08-14

5.  A study on the clinical outcomes of patients with revision surgery for adjacent segment disease after 10-year's anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Jia Li; Tong Tong; Ruijie Niu; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Different surgical approaches for the treatment of adjacent segment diseases after anterior cervical fusion: A retrospective study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Peng Wang; De-Chao Miao; Wei Du; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Non-Fusion Model Produced by a Novel Implant.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Baobao Liang; Xu Zhai; Jie Qin; Xijing He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-06

8.  Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after single-lever anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Hong-Tao Hou; Peng Wang; Jing-Tao Zhang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Ravi Sharma; Sachin A Borkar; Revanth Goda; Shashank S Kale
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-07-26

10.  Minimally invasive cervical laminoforaminotomy - Technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Umesh Srikantha; Akshay Hari; Yadhu K Lokanath
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-12-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.