Literature DB >> 28168336

Predictors of cervical lordosis loss after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Jing Tao Zhang1, Jia Qi Li1, Rui Jie Niu1, Zhao Liu1, Tong Tong1, Yong Shen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether radiological, clinical, and demographic findings in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were independently associated with loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) after laminoplasty.
METHODS: The prospective study included 41 consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for CSM. The difference in C2-7 Cobb angle between the postoperative and preoperative films was used to evaluate change in cervical alignment. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2-7 range of motion (C2-7 ROM), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), and cephalad vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty (CVLL) were assessed. Data were analyzed using Pearson and Spearman correlation test, and univariate and stepwise multivariate linear regression.
RESULTS: T1 slope, C2-7 SVA, and CVLL significantly correlated with LCL (P < 0.001), whereas age, BMI, and preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle did not. In multiple linear regression analysis, higher T1 slope (B = 0.351, P = 0.037), greater C2-7 SVA (B = 0.393, P < 0.001), and starting laminoplasty at C4 level (B = - 7.038, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher postoperative LCL.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical alignment was compromised after laminoplasty in patients with CSM, and the degree of LCL was associated with preoperative T1 slope, C2-7 SVA, and CVLL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Kyphosis; Kyphotic alignment change; Laminoplasty; Lordosis; Sagittal alignment; Sagittal balance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168336     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-4971-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Cervical alignment and range of motion after laminoplasty: radiographical data from more than 500 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tetsuro Hida; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  H Iizuka; T Shimizu; K Tateno; N Toda; H Edakuni; H Shimada; K Takagishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  H Baba; K Uchida; Y Maezawa; N Furusawa; M Azuchi; S Imura
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty.

Authors:  I Kimura; H Shingu; Y Nasu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

Review 7.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Tetsurou Hida; Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Shengrong Lin; Feifei Zhou; Yu Sun; Zhongqiang Chen; Fengshan Zhang; Shengfa Pan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis.

Authors:  Keith W Michael; Thomas M Neustein; John M Rhee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review.

Authors:  Intekhab Alam; Ravi Sharma; Sachin A Borkar; Revanth Goda; Varidh Katiyar; Shashank S Kale
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-08-14

2.  Importance of the preoperative cross-sectional area of the semispinalis cervicis as a risk factor for loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Byung-Jou Lee; Jin Hoon Park; Sang-Ryong Jeon; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lin Du; Yanzheng Gao; Changqing Zhao; Tangjun Zhou; Haijun Tian; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Cervical Lordosis Ratio as a Novel Predictor for the Loss of Cervical Lordosis After Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kosei Ono; Sohei Murata; Mutsumi Matsushita; Hiroshi Murakami
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-01-22

5.  Predictive factors of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Jiangbo Bai; Bing Zhang; Yong Shen; Dehu Tian
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Influence of SCA on clinical outcomes and cervical alignment after laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Xi-Wen Fan; Zhen Liu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Wen-Yuan Ding; Da-Long Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  The Role of Nutrition in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Celine I Partha Sarathi; Oliver D Mowforth; Amil Sinha; Faheem Bhatti; Aniqah Bhatti; Melika Akhbari; Shahzaib Ahmed; Benjamin M Davies
Journal:  Nutr Metab Insights       Date:  2021-10-30

8.  The discrepancy between preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope predisposes inferior clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Fan Wang; Wei-Guo Zhu; Wei Wang; Xiang-Yu Li; Chao Kong; Cheng-Xin Liu; Bin Shi; Shi-Bao Lu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 9.  Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Ravi Sharma; Sachin A Borkar; Revanth Goda; Shashank S Kale
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-07-26

10.  Cervical alignment following laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Ravi Sharma; Sachin A Borkar; Manoj Phalak; S Leve Joseph; Shashank S Kale
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.