Literature DB >> 31528029

Molecular diversity of the invA gene obtained from human and egg samples.

Mona Kadry1, Sara Mohamed Nader1, Sohad M Dorgham2, Mai M Kandil2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Salmonellosis is one of the most common foodborne bacterial diseases in the world. The great majority of Salmonella infections in humans are foodborne with Salmonella enterica and Salmonella Typhimurium accounting for a major part of the problem. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of invA gene in strains of Salmonellae isolated from eggs and diarrheal swabs from human cases. In addition, the relationship between invA gene nucleotide sequences from different sources (human stool and egg samples) have been studied through phylogenetic tree.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy eggs (eggshell and its contents) and 160 stool swabs samples were collected from four poultry farms and medical hospital in Giza Governorate.
RESULTS: The study reported the presence of two Salmonella strains in eggshell surface with an overall isolation rate of 1.2 and 0% of the egg content. Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium were isolated from eggshell surface with an incidence of 50% for each strain. Six salmonella strains were isolated from human stool with an incidence of 3.75%; the isolated strains are S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa, and Salmonella Kentucky with an incidence of 33.3%, 16.6%, 16.6%, 16.6%, and 16.6%, respectively. Among eight Salmonella strains, invA gene was detected with percentage of 50%. The phylogenetic analysis of the sequences invA gene, from two isolates included in this study and five isolates retrieved from GenBank showed that sequence from human, layer hens, egg, and water in the same clusters.
CONCLUSION: Close relation between drinking contaminated water and layer hens and contaminated water is one such source.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonella; invA gene; phylogeny

Year:  2019        PMID: 31528029      PMCID: PMC6702568          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1033-1038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


Introduction

Salmonella is one of the most important foodborne pathogens which caused food safety hazards for the food industry. Salmonellosis is a critical medical issue and a major challenge worldwide having greater significance in developing countries [1]. The danger of Salmonella may vary between the production systems, caused by components of the husbandry systems affecting disease development and pathogen shedding or differences in the level of resistance to the pathogen [2]. The presence of Salmonella in poultry farms is a major concern for public health [3]. Poultry products, particularly eggs and egg products, are nutritive nourishment of human food. Egg farms and market outlets may be contaminated with Salmonellae at any production stage by horizontal or vertical transmission. Vertical transmission means contamination of egg yolk, albumin, membranes, or eggshells. While in horizontal transmission, disease is penetrated during or after oviposition through the eggshell from the gut or contaminated feces [4]. The cause and the method of the spread of Salmonella spp. between the egg items and the customers should be recognized to influence the illness manage. Moreover, Salmonella spp. contamination may be prevalent in a farm environment. The virulence of Salmonella is linked to a combination of chromosomal and plasmid factors. Different genes such as invA, spv, fimA, and stn are known as major virulence genes accountable for salmonellosis. The chromosomally located invasion gene invA codes for a protein in the inner membrane of bacteria that are necessary for invasion of epithelial cells [5]. The invA sequence of enteric bacteria contains sequences distinctive to the current genus and has been established as an appropriate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) target with potential diagnostic application [6,7]. Conventional methods for the identification of Salmonella are time-consuming and need selective enrichment and plating, followed by biochemical tests. On the other hand, PCR is a rapid and reliable technique for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens as a complementary to conventional culture [6]. Therefore, our study was designed to investigate the presence of invA gene in Salmonellae strain. The phylogenetic tree was used to detect the relationship between the invA gene sequences from different sources (human stool and egg samples).

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval and informed consents

The study was conducted according to ethical guidelines approved by Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. Stool samples from human were collected after informed consents.

Sample collection

A total of 170 eggs (eggshell and its contents) from four poultry farms and 160 stool swabs samples from the Medical hospital were collected during the period from April to May 2016 in Giza Governorate.

Isolation and identification of Salmonella strains

Eggshell surface

A sterile cotton swab, soaked in sterilized normal saline was swabbed on egg surface and immersed in 10 ml normal saline solution followed by transmission to 90 ml of buffered peptone water then incubated at 37°C for 18 h [8].

Egg albumin and yolk

Samples of egg yolks and egg albumins were examined separately as 5 ml of each sample was mixed with 5 ml of normal saline solution. Afterward, the solution was transferred to 90 ml of buffered peptone water and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Identification of Salmonella: 1 ml pre-enriched sample was added in 10 ml Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium vortexed and incubated for 24±2 h at 42°C; then, loopful of each RV tube was cultured onto the surface of Xylose-Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) agar for 24 h at 37°C.

The stool samples

About 2-10 g stool was collected into a sterile leak-proof container (not use preservatives) and then thoroughly coated sterile cotton swab with fecal material then inserted the swab in its sheath and these samples were inoculated aseptically into tubes containing buffer peptone water. About 1 ml pre-enriched sample was added in 10 ml RV medium vortexed and incubated for 24±2 h at 42°C; then, loopful of each RV tube was cultured onto the surface of XLD agar for 24 h at 37°C [9]. Typical Salmonella colonies were subjected to a series of biochemical, serological, and molecular tests for the identification of Salmonella spp.

Biochemical identification

Suspected colonies were identified using chemical tests, including Gram staining, indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, citrate utilization, triple sugar iron, and lysine decarboxylation [10].

Serological identification

Serotyping of isolates was done in serogroup level by a standard agglutination test using O and H antisera (Difco, USA). It was performed by the central public health laboratories.

Molecular detection of invA gene

DNA extraction

The DNA of Salmonella strains was extracted using the boiling method [11]. The reaction mixture consisted of 25 μl Platinum™ Hot Start PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen™), 1 μl DNA extract, 0.5 μl of each primer in the concentration of 20 pmol, and nuclease-free water up to 50 μl. The PCR for invA gene-specific oligonucleotide primers for invA gene is described in Table-1 [12]. Temperature and time conditions of the primers during PCR are shown in Table-2.
Table 1

Primer sequences for invA gene.

Target genePrimer sequenceSize of amplified productReference
InvAGTGAAATTATCGCCACGTTCGGGCAA TCATCGCACCGTCAAAGGAACC284 BP[12]
Table 2

PCR cycling conditions.

Initial denaturationDenaturationAnnealingExtensionFinal extensionNumber of cycles
95°C95°C58°C72°C72°C35
10min1min1min1min10min
Primer sequences for invA gene. PCR cycling conditions. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gels (QIAGEN, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland).

Sequence analysis for invA gene

About 20 uL from each primer were aliquoted into thin-wall PCR tubes. Tubes were sent by mail to be sequenced at laboratory technology; then, the DNA sequencer was used to conduct sequencing. The whole experimental process was monitored through the Laboratory Information Management System. The results of sequencing were analyzed by BLAST web tool of the Genbank (NCBI). We performed the alignment by Multalin interface and for the construction of the phylogenetic tree by use from www.phylogeny.fr “one click mode.”

Results

From tested 170 eggs (eggshell and its contents) using biochemical and serological identification, only two Salmonella strains (S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium) were isolated from eggshell surface and also six Salmonella strains were isolated from 160 stool swabs samples with an incidence of 3.75%; the most prevalent serovar was S. Typhimurium (33.3%) followed by 16.6% of each S. Enteritidis, Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa, and Salmonella Kentucky. The PCR assay was carried out in this study for the detection of Salmonella invasion gene (invA) in eight Salmonella isolates and the result revealed that 50% were positive for invA gene in both egg (S. Typhimurium) and human (S. Virchow and S. Kentucky) isolates.

Sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree

The authors illustrated in this study a robust phylogeny of Salmonella subspecies using the sequences of invasion (invA) gene, from two isolates with accession numbers (MG001904- MG001905) included in this study and five isolates retrieved from GenBank. Analysis of these sequences showed that the sequences included in this study (human and egg strain) have polytomy which placed in the same clusters with two strain retrieved from GenBank (layer hen and water strain) while the other three sequences retrieved from GenBank form a sole different cluster.

Discussion

Salmonella is an important cause of foodborne (alimentary) health problems in humans [13]. Contamination of eggshell by Salmonella spp. can happen through fecal material, insects, and feed or even through transportation, storage, or during handling. Our study revealed that an overall isolation rate of Salmonella in eggshell surface and egg content were 1.2% and 0% respectively as shown in Table-3 , this may be due to fecal material contamination. Similar observations were stated by Davies and Breslin [14]. On the other side, the eggshell surface contamination increases the risk of egg contents contamination by penetration through egg surface cracks [15]. According to Table-3, S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium were isolated from egg samples (the most common serotype among Salmonella isolates), this finding supported by Edema and Atayese [16] who mentioned that hen eggs have become a principal source of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium since those serotypes can colonize the ovarian tissue of hens, and in this way, it will be available inside the content of intact shell eggs.In addition to that, Salmonella spp. have ability to invade the cells of the follicles before ovulation and multiply themselves after 2 h of infection [12]. Mwansa et al. [17] reported that S. Typhimurium is the predominant Salmonella serovars isolated from human patients. There is a growing concern about human infections caused by other serovars such as S. Virchow which has higher abilities than other serovars to cause invasive salmonellosis; furthermore, S. Kentucky represents one of the non-typhoidal types of Salmonella species that microbiologists and public health professionals encounter from time to time. What makes S. Kentucky stand out and explains its public health importance is that this infectious agent has managed to develop resistance to some antibiotics. Hence, it’s tougher to treat [18]. Zou et al. [19] reported that S. Enteritidis has been most frequently involved in human salmonellosis outbreaks. According to CDC, S. Enteritidis was confirmed to be on the top of the laboratory – human Salmonella infections reports [20,21]. Although potentially all livestock can be infected with Salmonella species, contaminated poultry meat and eggs may be the main source of Salmonella infection for humans, especially where S. Enteritidis is implicated, human infections can be traced back to eggs and poultry meat [22]. From this result, it is suggested that there is a strong relationship between cases of Salmonella infection related to human illness and Salmonella species positive in poultry meat and so this explanation is agreed with that stated by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [23]. More than 70% of human salmonellosis has been attributed to the consumption of contaminated chicken meat or egg. PCR has become a powerful tool for the detection of pathogens in food, especially Salmonella in the past decade [24]. Furthermore, the detection of Salmonella is rapidly and accurately due to the primer sequences that are selected from the gene invA. The invA gene considered to be the international standard for the identification of salmonellosis, in addition to being introduced as effective, rapid, and accurate method for the detection of Salmonella in foods of animal origin [25]. The presence of invA gene is referred to its ability for invasion of cells, having the capacity to invade and survive in macrophages [26]. The World Health Organization [27] mentioned that S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are the most significant serovars harboring the virulence invA gene causing salmonellosis globally. According to our results (Table-4), among eight Salmonella strains, invA gene was detected 50%, this results fully agreed with Indu and Kashmiri [28] who mentioned that invA gene was present in 22 isolates (55%) from 40 Salmonella isolates from poultry meat samples. Our results disagreed with Sheila et al. [29] who stated that of 32 samples, four samples of Salmonella which isolated from milkfish carried invA gene with a length of 284 bp, while 28 samples did not show the target band. The current study explained the absence of invA gene in certain Salmonella strains because they are not invasive or may have other invasive mechanisms; this indication supported by Malorny et al. [25].
Table 3

The incidence of isolation and serological identification of Salmonella strains.

Source of samplesNumber of examined samplesSalmonellae isolatesSerotyping


n(%)Typen(%)
Eggshell surface1702(1.2)S. Enteritidis1(50)
S. Typhimurium1(50)
Egg content1700(0)--
Stool1606(3.75)S. Typhimurium2(33.3)
S. Enteritidis1(16.6)
S. Virchow1(16.6)
S. Haifa1(16.6)
S. Kentucky1(16.6)

S. Typhimurium=Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis=Salmonella Enteritidis, S.Virchow=Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa=S.Haifa, S.Kentucky=Salmonella Kentucky

Table 4

Detection of invA gene from the positive serotyping.

Source of samplesSerotypesPresence of InvA gene
Eggshell surfaceS. EnteritidisNegative
S. TyphimuriumPositive
StoolS. Typhimurium(1 out of 2)
S. EnteritidisPositive
S. VirchowNegative
S. HaifaPositive
S. KentuckyNegative

S. Typhimurium=Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis=Salmonella Enteritidis, S. Virchow=Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa=S. Haifa, Salmonella Kentucky=S. Kentucky

The incidence of isolation and serological identification of Salmonella strains. S. Typhimurium=Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis=Salmonella Enteritidis, S.Virchow=Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa=S.Haifa, S.Kentucky=Salmonella Kentucky Detection of invA gene from the positive serotyping. S. Typhimurium=Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis=Salmonella Enteritidis, S. Virchow=Salmonella Virchow, Salmonella Haifa=S. Haifa, Salmonella Kentucky=S. Kentucky

Analysis of phylogenetic tree

Bacteria belonging to the genus Salmonella are a very important reason for human food poisoning. In certain parts of the world, Salmonella is also an important cause of disease in poultry. Salmonella serotypes can be introduced into poultry flocks from many different sources which can carry Salmonella either at the farm level or in the processing plants. We illustrated in this study a robust phylogeny (Figure-1) of Salmonella subspecies using the sequences of invasion (invA) gene, from two isolates included in this study and five isolates retrieved from GenBank. Analysis of these sequences showed that sequence from human, layer hens, egg, and water in the same clusters which refer to the close relation between drinking contaminated water and layer hens and contaminated water is one such source, which returns into the contamination of eggshell and finally leads to human infection [30]. The other cluster explains the use of fecal matter of animals and poultry in fertilizing the ground, leading to soil contamination which may also reflect on shell egg contamination on the farm [31]. According to our results, it is noted that chicken and human are an important source of infection to each other. This result was supported by Nawar and Khedr [32] who reported that Salmonellae can be transmitted to humans through dealing with chicken meat and/or consumption of uncooked meat and eggs.
Figure-1

A phylogeny of Salmonella subspecies using the sequences of invasion invA gene.

A phylogeny of Salmonella subspecies using the sequences of invasion invA gene.

Conclusion

Finally, from work done here, we have to advise; application of strict biosecurity will be a need on the farm. Very strict restrictions measures on personnel and equipment movement should be taken. Routine checks for the presence of Salmonella species should be often undertaken. Within chicken meat processing plants, there would be a number of steps taken (e.g., water chlorination, correct temperature controls) to ensure that contamination is under control. The study concluded that eggs are representing a source of infection with Salmonella in the absence of exposure to sufficient heat during the process of cooking and, therefore, should beware of desserts or foods containing raw eggs. In addition to that, personal hygiene of food handlers must be taken in consideration; food areas should be kept clean and regularly sanitized to reduce the risks of food poisoning outbreaks and finally, make people aware of the dangers of foods that contain undercooked eggs and egg products.

Authors’ Contributions

SMD and MMK performed bacterial isolation and identification. MK, SMN finished PCR and analysis of phylogenetic tree. All authors participated in draft and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  15 in total

1.  Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard.

Authors:  Burkhard Malorny; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Cornelia Bunge; Reiner Helmuth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Modification of the methodology of stool culture for Salmonella detection.

Authors:  J Ruiz; M A Sempere; M C Varela; J Gomez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Eggshell penetration of hen's eggs by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis upon various storage conditions.

Authors:  W Messens; K Grijspeerdt; L Herman
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.095

4.  Analysis of meat juice ELISA results and questionnaire data to investigate farm-level risk factors for Salmonella infection in UK pigs.

Authors:  R P Smith; H E Clough; A J C Cook
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.702

5.  Distribution of virulence genes in Salmonella serovars isolated from man & animals.

Authors:  H V Murugkar; H Rahman; P K Dutta
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Observations on Salmonella contamination of eggs from infected commercial laying flocks where vaccination for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis had been used.

Authors:  Robert Davies; Mark Breslin
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.378

7.  Survey of Enterobacteriaceae contamination of table eggs collected from layer flocks in Australia.

Authors:  V C Gole; K K Chousalkar; J R Roberts
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Molecular Characterization of Salmonella from Human and Animal Origins in Uganda.

Authors:  Atek Atwiine Kagirita; Andrew Baguma; Tonny Jimmy Owalla; Joel Bazira; Samuel Majalija
Journal:  Int J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-05-28

9.  Detection of invA gene of Salmonella from milkfish (Chanos chanos) at Sidoarjo wet fish market, Indonesia, using polymerase chain reaction technique.

Authors:  Sheila Marty Yanestria; Reina Puspita Rahmaniar; Freshinta Jellia Wibisono; Mustofa Helmi Effendi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-01-29

10.  Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky in Canada.

Authors:  Michael R Mulvey; David A Boyd; Rita Finley; Ken Fakharuddin; Stacie Langner; Vanessa Allen; Lei Ang; Sadjia Bekal; Sameh El Bailey; David Haldane; Linda Hoang; Greg Horsman; Marie Louis; Lourens Robberts; John Wylie
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  3 in total

1.  Multidrug Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Detection of mcr-1 Gene in Salmonella Species Isolated from Chicken.

Authors:  Md Bashir Uddin; S M Bayejed Hossain; Mahmudul Hasan; Mohammad Nurul Alam; Mita Debnath; Ruhena Begum; Sawrab Roy; Ahmed Harun-Al-Rashid; Md Shahidur Rahman Chowdhury; Md Mahfujur Rahman; Md Mukter Hossain; Fazle Elahi; Mohammed Yousuf Elahi Chowdhury; Josef D Järhult; Mohamed E El Zowalaty; Syed Sayeem Uddin Ahmed
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Molecular Characterization of Bacteria, Detection of Enterotoxin Genes, and Screening of Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Traditionally Processed Meat Products of Sikkim, India.

Authors:  Meera Ongmu Bhutia; Namrata Thapa; Jyoti Prakash Tamang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Salmonella serovars in sheep and goats and their probable zoonotic potential to humans in Suez Canal Area, Egypt.

Authors:  Hanan Abd El-Halim Hawwas; Abdel-Karim Mahmoud Aboueisha; Hanaa Mohamed Fadel; Heba Sayed El-Mahallawy
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.