Literature DB >> 26644874

Detection of Salmonella spp in commercial eggs in Iran.

Mir-Hassan Moosavy1, Saber Esmaeili2, Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri3, Ehsan Mostafavi2, Taghi Zahraei Salehi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Salmonellosis can be acquired through consumption of infected raw or undercooked eggs. The aim of this study was isolation and identification of Salmonella spp from the eggshells and the egg contents samples of Tabriz retails.
METHODS: A total number of 150 samples of eggs were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella spp. using conventional culture method and multiplex-PCR.
RESULTS: Two (1.33%) out of 150 samples from eggshells were determined as contaminated with Salmonella spp. Salmonella spp was not isolated from the egg contents. Salmonella serovar was determined as enteritidis and typhimurium.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study provide the recent dataset of the prevalence of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in eggs at retail shops in the northwest of Iran. It is important to remember that control is required at all levels in the food chain and by separating cooked and raw.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Egg; Iran; Isolation; Prevalence; Salmonella

Year:  2015        PMID: 26644874      PMCID: PMC4670468     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Salmonella species have been considered one of the most important food-borne pathogens, around the world (1). Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis are the most frequently isolated serovars from food-borne outbreaks throughout the world. S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium usually induce self limiting gastroenteritis or an asymptomatic carrier state in a wide variety of animal species (2). These serovars are also characterized by a wider geographical spread and they can be carried by a range of animal vectors (1). Human infections with S. enteritidis originate mainly from eggs and egg products (when consumed raw or undercooked), while S. typhimurium infections originate predominantly from pigs, cattle and poultry meat, as well as environmental contamination with companion animals or infected birds (1, 3). In the United States, about 80% (298 from 371) of the known-source S. enteritidis outbreaks from 1985 to 1999 were egg-associated (4). In European Union, S. enteritidis was identified as the cause of infection in 62.5% of the cases, and S. typhimurium in 12.9% (5). Eggs are used as an inexpensive food source in the form of shell eggs, liquid, frozen, and/or dried products (6). The eggs and its products provide a reliable source of nutrition; as well as they serve a more functions in other products. Due to wide spread use of eggs as a food source, the safety of this product is important. Eggshells and egg contents can be contaminated by the bacteria in a variety of routs, such as during egg formation in the hen reproductive system or the environmental conditions (7). Several outbreaks of salmonellosis have been reported where the eggs were the source of human infection; especially in the case of undercooked or raw eggs (8–9). Generally, there are two possible routes of egg contamination by Salmonella. Eggs can be contaminated by penetration of the bacterium through the eggshell from the colonized gut or from contaminated faeces during or after oviposition (horizontal transmission). The second possible route is by direct contamination of the yolk, albumen, eggshell membranes or eggshells before oviposition, originating from the infection of reproductive organs with Salmonella (vertical transmission) (1, 5). In north west of Iran, little is known about the prevalence of this bacterium in foods especially in eggs. The aim of the present study was to isolate and identify Salmonella spp from the eggshells and egg contents of Tabriz retails.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and sampling.

This study was conducted in the city of Tabriz, East-Azerbaijan province (northwest of Iran). The sampling area was divided into 30 clusters. Five stores were randomly selected from each cluster and an egg was randomly selected from each store. Sampled eggs had been produced in industrial farms. In total, 150 eggs were collected from 150 stores. All the samples were collected aseptically, placed into sterile bags and were transferred to the Food Microbiology Laboratory of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tabriz University.

Microbiological analysis.

The eggs were transferred aseptically to beakers containing 225 ml of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW, Merck, Germany). They were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h followed by transferring of 1 ml to the selenite–cystine broth (SC, Merck, Germany) and 0.1 ml to the Rappaport–Vasiliadis medium (RV, Merck, Germany) with incubation for 24 h at 37 °C (SC) and 41.5 °C (RV) (23). From the broths one loopful was subcultured on Brilliant Green and Phenol Red agar (BGA, Merck, Germany) and Bismuth Sulphite Agar (BSA, Merck, Germany). The media were inoculated at 37 °C for 24 h (BGA) or 48 h (BSA). Then, suspected colonies were transferred onto Salmonella-Shigella agar (Merck, Germany) plates, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The plates were observed for typical Salmonella-like colonies, randomly, two colonies from each plate were picked, purified and subjected to primary biochemical screening tests, which involved reactions on Triple Sugar Iron agar (Merck, Germany), Lysine Iron agar (Merck, Germany), motility and Indole and H2S production in Sulfide-Indole-Motility (SIM, Merck, Germany) and urea splitting ability in Christensen’s Urea agar (Merck, Germany). Slide agglutination test were performed using polyvalent H serum and the group sera (Difco, USA).

Detection of Salmonella in egg contents:

After treatment of the eggs in BPW, they were taken out of the beakers and the eggshells were sterilized by immersing for 12 seconds in water at 100 °C. Then the eggs were broken in the sterile beaker and 225 ml of BPW was poured over them. Salmonella was then isolated as described above.

DNA preparation and Multiplex-PCR assay.

The suspected Salmonella colonies were subjected to Multiplex-PCR assay for final confirmation as Salmonella spp. and identification of typhimurium or enteritidis serovars. Isolated strains were cultured onto Luria Bertani agar (LBA, Merck, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. For DNA extraction, 1–2 colonies of each sample from LB agar was suspended in 250 μL of sterile distilled water. In order to have uniform turbidity the samples were vortexed, and then were boiled for 10 min and centrifuged at 6000×g for 7 min. Supernatants were collected and saved for multiplex PCR analysis (10). Multiplex PCR was performed with 2 independent sets for DNA amplification of S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis. Four sets of primer pairs specific for rfbJ (663 bp), fljB (526 bp), invA (284 bp), and fliC (183 bp) were used in the case of S. typhimurium (Table 1), and three sets of primer pairs designed for a random sequence specific for the genus Salmonella (429 bp), sefA (310 bp), and spv (250 bp) for S. enteritidis (Table 2). Both reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μL that contained 4 μL of template DNA, 2.5 μL of reaction buffer (10X), 0.8 μL of dNTPs (10 mM), 1 μL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.3 μL of Taq polymerase (5 U μL–1), 8.4 μL of sterile distilled water, and 1 μL of each primer (10 μM) for S. typhimurium, and for S. enteritidis, 3 μL of template DNA, 0.6 μL of Taq polymerase, 9.9 μL of distilled water, and 1.25 μL of each primer (10 μM), in addition to buffer, dNTPs, and MgCl 2 at the same volume and stock concentrations as mentioned.
Table 1

Primers used for the detection of S. typhimurium.

PrimerTarget geneLength (bp)Sequence (5′-3′)Amplification product (bp)
ST141invA26GTGAAATTATCGCCACGTTCGGGCAA284
ST139invA22TCATCGCACCGTCAAAGGAACC

RfbjrfbJ24CCAGCACCAGTTCCAACTTGATAC663
RfbjrfbJ24GGCTTCCGGCTTTATTGGTAAGCA

FlicfliC23ATAGCCATCTTACCAGTTCCCCC183
FlicfliC24GCTGCAACTGTTACAGGATATGCC

FljbfljB24ACGAATGGTACGGCTTCTGTAACC526
FljbfljB24TACCGTCGATAGTAACGACTTCGG
Table 2

Primers used for the detection of S. enteritidis.

PrimerTarget geneLength (bp)Sequence (5′-3′)Amplification product (bp)
ST11Random sequence[*]24GCCAACCATTGCTAAATTGGCGCA429
ST14Random sequence[*]25GGTAGAAATTCCCAGCGGGTACTGG

S1Spv[**]20GCCGTACACGAGCTTATAGA 250
S4Spv20ACCTACAGGGGCACAATAAC

SEFA2sefA[***]20GCAGCGGTTACTATTGCAGC310
SEFA4sefA20TGTGACAGGGACATTTAGCG

Randomly cloned sequence specific for the genus Salmonella

Salmonella plasmid virulent gene

S. enteritidis fimbrial antigen gene

Primers used for the detection of S. typhimurium. Primers used for the detection of S. enteritidis. Randomly cloned sequence specific for the genus Salmonella Salmonella plasmid virulent gene S. enteritidis fimbrial antigen gene Amplification was carried out using a Techne TC-512 thermocycler (Techne, UK), as follows: 35 cycles of 30 s for denaturation at 94 °C, 90 s for annealing at 56 °C, and 30 s for primer extension at 72 °C, followed by a terminal extension at 72 °C for 10 min in the case of S. enteritidis. Target genes for ST were amplified using the same thermocycler, as follows: 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 65 °C for 1 min, primer extension at 72 °C for 30 s, followed by 7 min at 72 °C for terminal extension. For both amplifications, initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min was used. The amplification products were analyzed by agar gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis of the amplification products was performed on 1.2% and 1.8% agarose gel for S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis samples, respectively. In both reactions, a 100-bp ladder was used as a molecular weight marker. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (2 μg/mL) to visualize fluorescent bands while using UV in the gel document system (Bio-Rad, UK).

Statistical analysis.

The data were analysed by SPSS software (version 16). P-value less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Two samples (1.33%) out of 150 samples from eggshells were determined as contaminated with Salmonella spp. Salmonella serovar was determined as enteritidis and typhimurium (Fig. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of S. typhimurium. Four genes included rfbJ (663 bp), fljB (526 bp), invA (284 bp), and fliC (183 bp) amplified to the S. typhimurium.

Fig. 2

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of S. enteritidis. Three genes included genus (429 bp), sefA (310 bp), and (250 bp) amplified to the S. enteritidis.

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of S. typhimurium. Four genes included rfbJ (663 bp), fljB (526 bp), invA (284 bp), and fliC (183 bp) amplified to the S. typhimurium. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of S. enteritidis. Three genes included genus (429 bp), sefA (310 bp), and (250 bp) amplified to the S. enteritidis. salmonella spp. was not isolated from the egg contents. However, there was no statistical difference between eggshells and the egg contents with Salmonella contamination (p= 0.25).

DISCUSSION

Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is a direct link between the presence of Salmonella in poultry products and salmonellosis occurrence in humans. It was demonstrated in this study that 1.33% of eggs was contaminated by Salmonella. In similar studies conducted in Iran, contamination rate of commercial eggs with Salmonella has been reported 1.6% in Mashhad (North-eastern Iran, 2008) (11) and 1.61% in the city of Isfahan (Central Iran, 2011) (12). However, Salmonella has not been isolated from commercial eggs in other studies (13, 14). The rates for contamination of eggs with Salmonella in other countries are very different: 9.35% in Uruguay (15), 3.85 to 7.93% in India (16, 17), 0 to 1.11% in USA (18, 19), 1.05% in France (20), 0.4% in Canada (21), 0.25% in Japan (22), and zero in Poland (23). Although, Salmonella was isolated from eggshells in this study, but none of the contents were contaminated by Salmonella. In similar studies in Iran, Salmonella were isolated only from commercial eggshells (11, 12), which are consistent with the findings of our study. In most reports from other countries, Salmonella has been isolated only from shells (17, 18, 22), but there are also reports of contamination of the egg contents (15, 16). Contamination of eggshells represent a risk for the consumers, as they can directly infect and cross-contaminate the egg contents or other foodstuffs (1). Salmonellosis outbreak through contaminated eggshells with Salmonella in USA (2010) showed the importance of shell contamination, which this outbreak caused illness in 1939 persons (24). In previous reports from Iran, only one of S. enteritidis (11) or S. typhimurium (12) was isolated from eggs, but in our study, both serovars of enteritidis and typhimurium were identified. S. enteritidis is the most prevalent serovar in the world (1, 15, 17, 20, 22). Few eggs related outbreaks of salmonellosis caused by S. typhimurium are reported in humans in the European Union (3.5% against 77.2% caused by S. enteritidis) (1, 3). In general, egg-related outbreaks result from breakdowns in controlling measurements along the farm to fork continuum. International poultry control programs in developed countries have resulted in significant decreases in egg-related salmonellosis. These programs included: on-farm monitoring, diverting contaminated eggs for processing, culling infected flocks, cleaning and disinfection of sheds, maintaining cold chain of eggs, and vaccination of flocks (25). It is recommended that these controlling measurements should be done carefully in all countries including Iran. Results of the present study provide the recent dataset of the prevalence of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in eggs at retail shops in the northwest of Iran. Although, Salmonella was isolated from eggshells in this study, but Salmonella spp was not isolated from the egg contents. It is important to remember that control is required at all levels in the food chain and by separating cooked and raw.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Host adapted serotypes of Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  S Uzzau; D J Brown; T Wallis; S Rubino; G Leori; S Bernard; J Casadesús; D J Platt; J E Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and other salmonellas in the eggs and egg-storing trays from retail markets of Coimbatore, South India.

Authors:  T Suresh; A A M Hatha; D Sreenivasan; Nathan Sangeetha; P Lashmanaperumalsamy
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.516

3.  Pathogen prevalence and microbial levels associated with restricted shell eggs.

Authors:  D R Jones; M T Musgrove
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 4.  Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis.

Authors:  Inne Gantois; Richard Ducatelle; Frank Pasmans; Freddy Haesebrouck; Richard Gast; Tom J Humphrey; Filip Van Immerseel
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Prevalence of Salmonella enterica in poultry and eggs in Uruguay during an epidemic due to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis.

Authors:  L Betancor; M Pereira; A Martinez; G Giossa; M Fookes; K Flores; P Barrios; V Repiso; R Vignoli; N Cordeiro; G Algorta; N Thomson; D Maskell; F Schelotto; J A Chabalgoity
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Foodborne general outbreaks of Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 infection, England and Wales, 1992-2002: where are the risks?

Authors:  I A Gillespie; S J O'Brien; G K Adak; L R Ward; H R Smith
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Salmonella prevalence in commercial raw shell eggs in Japan: a survey.

Authors:  Y Sasaki; Y Tsujiyama; T Asai; Y Noda; S Katayama; Y Yamada
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Isolation of Salmonella enterica in laying-hen flocks and assessment of eggshell contamination in France.

Authors:  Marianne Chemaly; Adeline Huneau-Salaün; Annie Labbe; Catherine Houdayer; Isabelle Petetin; Philippe Fravalo
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  Salmonella contamination in commercial eggs and an egg production facility.

Authors:  F T Jones; D V Rives; J B Carey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Salmonella enteritidis infections, United States, 1985-1999.

Authors:  Mary E Patrick; Penny M Adcock; Thomas M Gomez; Sean F Altekruse; Ben H Holland; Robert V Tauxe; David L Swerdlow
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multidrug-resistant enterobacteria colonize commercial day-old broiler chicks in Nigeria.

Authors:  Obianuju Nkiruka Okorafor; Madubuike Umunna Anyanwu; Emmanuel Onyeka Nwafor; George Nnamdi Anosa; Rita Ijeoma Udegbunam
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-03-16

2.  Prevalence of Salmonella contamination in consumed eggs in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis study on published studies from 1996 to 2018.

Authors:  Behnam Hosseininezhad; Enayat Berizi; Marzieh Nader; Seyed Mohammad Mazloomi; Saeid Hosseinzadeh; Laya Ebrahimi; Morteza Zare
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-12-22

3.  Antimicrobial resistance patterns, virulence gene profiles, and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in various Iranian cities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Fardsanei; Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal; Taghi Zahraei Salehi; Masoumeh Douraghi; Mojtaba Memariani; Hamed Memariani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Molecular diversity of the invA gene obtained from human and egg samples.

Authors:  Mona Kadry; Sara Mohamed Nader; Sohad M Dorgham; Mai M Kandil
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.