Literature DB >> 15276979

Observations on Salmonella contamination of eggs from infected commercial laying flocks where vaccination for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis had been used.

Robert Davies1, Mark Breslin.   

Abstract

Eggs were collected monthly from 12 cage-layer flocks on four farms where Salmonella Enteritidis was present in vaccinated flocks despite vaccination with an S. Enteritidis bacterin. Where possible, hens were also taken for culture at the end of the laying period, and faecal and environmental samples were taken from the laying houses before and after cleaning and disinfection. Twenty-four batches of six egg shells from the 13 652 tested (0.18% [0.11 to 0.26 CI(95)] single egg equivalent) were positive for S. Enteritidis and 54 (0.40% [0.30 to 0.52 CI(95)] single egg equivalent) for other serovars. Six batches of 13 640 (0.04% [0.02 to 0.10 CI95] single egg equivalent) egg contents, bulked in six egg pools, contained S. Enteritidis and three batches contained other serovars. In addition three further batches contained S. Enteritidis in both contents and shells, and two other batches contained other serovars in both. The total level of contamination by S. Enteritidis of both contents and shells found in vaccinated flocks was therefore 33 batches/13 682 eggs(0.24% [0.17 to 0.34 CI(95)] single egg equivalent). The total of contamination for any Salmonella serovar was 92 batches/13 682 eggs (0.68% [0.55 to 0.84 CI(95)] single egg equivalent). These results contrast with the findings of testing of eggs from three unvaccinated flocks prior to this study where 21 batches of egg shells from a total of 2101 eggs (1.0% [0.63 to 1.56 CI(95)] single egg equivalent) and six batches of contents from 2051 eggs (0.29% [0.11 to 0.64 CI95] single egg equivalent) were contaminated with S. Enteritidis. S. Enteritidis was found in 67/699 (9.6%) of vaccinated spent hens and 64/562 (11.4%) of bulked fresh faecal samples taken from laying houses. Failure to adequately clean and disinfect laying houses and to control mice appeared to be a common feature on the farms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15276979     DOI: 10.1080/03079450310001652040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Pathol        ISSN: 0307-9457            Impact factor:   3.378


  7 in total

1.  Observations related to the Salmonella EU layer baseline survey in the United Kingdom: follow-up of positive flocks and sensitivity issues.

Authors:  J J Carrique-Mas; M Breslin; L Snow; M E Arnold; A Wales; I McLaren; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Effect of Salmonella vaccination of breeder chickens on contamination of broiler chicken carcasses in integrated poultry operations.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Dana J Cole; Charles Hofacre; Katherine Zamperini; Demetrius Mathis; Michael P Doyle; Margie D Lee; John J Maurer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Bacterial vaccines in poultry.

Authors:  Nagwa S Rabie; Zeinab M S Amin Girh
Journal:  Bull Natl Res Cent       Date:  2020-01-29

4.  Public health assessment of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis inactivated-vaccine treatment in layer flocks.

Authors:  Yukiko Toyota-Hanatani; Tomoya Ekawa; Hiroaki Ohta; Shizunobu Igimi; Yukiko Hara-Kudo; Kazumi Sasai; Eiichiroh Baba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Control of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in laying hens by inactivated Salmonella Enteritidis vaccines.

Authors:  Oliveiro Caetano de Freitas Neto; Aline Lopes Mesquita; Jaqueline Boldrin de Paiva; Fábio Zotesso; Angelo Berchieri Júnior
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

6.  Molecular diversity of the invA gene obtained from human and egg samples.

Authors:  Mona Kadry; Sara Mohamed Nader; Sohad M Dorgham; Mai M Kandil
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-07-15

7.  Non-viable chicken embryos: an overlooked niche harbouring a significant source of multidrug resistant bacteria in the poultry production.

Authors:  Ruwani Karunarathna; Khawaja Ashfaque Ahmed; Mengying Liu; Chenfang Yu; Shelly Popowich; Kalhari Goonewardene; Thushari Gunawardana; Shanika Kurukulasuriya; Ashish Gupta; Lisanework E Ayalew; Philip Willson; Musangu Ngeleka; Susantha Gomis
Journal:  Int J Vet Sci Med       Date:  2020-01-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.