Literature DB >> 19683685

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Carrie E Bedient1, Javier F Magrina, Brie N Noble, Rosanne M Kho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes of patients with symptomatic leiomyomas after robot-assisted ("robotic") or laparoscopic myomectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 81 patients undergoing robotic (n=40) or laparoscopic (n=41) myomectomy. Data included fibroid characteristics (number, weight, location, and pathologic findings), operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospitalization length.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a significantly larger mean uterine size, larger mean size of the largest fibroid, and greater number of fibroids. When adjusted for uterine size and fibroid size and number, no significant differences were noted between robotic vs laparoscopic groups for mean operating time (141 vs 166 minutes), mean blood loss (100 vs 250 mL), intraoperative or postoperative complications (2% vs 20% and 11% vs 17%, respectively), hospital stay more than 2 days (12% vs 23%), readmissions, or symptom resolution.
CONCLUSION: Short-term surgical outcomes were similar after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy; long-term outcomes were not assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683685     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  36 in total

1.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Assessment of Blood Loss in Abdominal Myomectomy by Intramyometrial Vasopressin Administration Versus Conventional Tourniquet Application.

Authors:  Mriganka Mouli Saha; Subhash Chandra Biswas; Hajekul Alam; Gouri Sankar Kamilya; Madhumita Mukhopadhyay; Sarbeswar Mondal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

3.  Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases.

Authors:  Paula K Edelson; Kristoffel R Dumon; Seema S Sonnad; Bilal M Shafi; Noel N Williams
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Proceedings from the Third National Institutes of Health International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendations.

Authors:  James H Segars; Estella C Parrott; Joan D Nagel; Xiaoxiao Catherine Guo; Xiaohua Gao; Linda S Birnbaum; Vivian W Pinn; Darlene Dixon
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Robotic myomectomy: a review of indications and techniques.

Authors:  Alexander M Quaas; Jon I Einarsson; Serene Srouji; Antonio R Gargiulo
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jayapriya Jayakumaran; Sejal D Patel; Bhushan K Gangrade; Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian; Celso Silva
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and adenomyomectomy with a flexible CO2 laser device.

Authors:  Sara E Barton; Antonio R Gargiulo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-06-24

Review 8.  Uterine leiomyomas: individualizing the approach to a heterogeneous condition.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Surgical outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared to abdominal myomectomy.

Authors:  Roopina Sangha; David I Eisenstein; Amy George; Adnan Munkarah; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-09-19

10.  Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Aaron Varghese; Marisol Doglioli; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.