Literature DB >> 23081871

Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy.

Michael C Pitter1, Antonio R Gargiulo, Leo M Bonaventura, J Stefano Lehman, Serene S Srouji.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the characteristics of the pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri? SUMMARY ANSWER: Despite a high prevalence of women with advanced maternal age, obesity and multiple pregnancy in our cohort, the outcomes are comparable with those reported in the literature for laparoscopic myomectomy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Reproductive outcomes after traditional laparoscopic myomectomy are well documented. However, reproductive outcomes following robotic myomectomy are not well studied. This paper describes the pregnancy outcomes for a large cohort of women after robotic myomectomy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort of women who became pregnant after robot-assisted myomectomy at three centers. Of the 872 women who underwent robotic myomectomy during the period October 2005-November 2010, 107 subsequently conceived resulting in 127 pregnancies and 92 deliveries through 2011. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING,
METHODS: Women of reproductive age with fibroids who wanted a minimally invasive treatment option and desired uterine preservation were recruited. We conducted a multicentre study with three centers, two in a private practice and one in an academic setting. Pregnancy outcomes and their relationship to myoma characteristics were analyzed. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: Mean ± SD age at myomectomy was 34.8 ± 4.5 years and 57.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.0, 66.3] of women were overweight or obese. The mean number of myomas removed was 3.9 ± 3.2 with a mean size of 7.5 ± 3.0 cm and mean weight of 191.7 ± 144.8 g. Entry of the myoma into the endometrial cavity occurred in 20.6% (95% CI 15.0, 27.7) of patients. The mean time to conception was 12.9 ± 11.5 months. Assisted reproduction techniques were employed in 39.4% (95% CI 32.6, 46.7) of these women. Seven twin pregnancies and two triplet pregnancies occurred, for a multiple pregnancy birth rate of 9.8% (95% CI 5.0, 17.8). Spontaneous abortions occurred in 18.9% (95% CI 13.0, 26.6). Preterm delivery prior to 35 weeks of gestational age occurred in 17.4% (95% CI 10.9, 26.5). One uterine rupture (1.1%; 95% CI 0.3, 4.7) was documented. Pelvic adhesions were discovered in 11.4% (95% CI 7.0, 18.0) of patients delivered by Cesarean section. Higher preterm delivery rates were significantly associated with a greater number of myomas removed and anterior location of the largest incision (compared with all other sites) in logistic regression analyses (P = 0.01). None of the myoma characteristics were related to spontaneous abortion. BIAS, CONFOUNDING AND OTHER REASONS FOR CAUTION: Given the retrospective nature of the data collection, some pregnancies may not have been captured. In addition, owing to the high prevalence of infertility patients in this cohort, the data cannot be used to counsel women who are undergoing RALM about fertility rates after surgery. GENERALIZABILITY TO OTHER POPULATIONS: Prospective studies are needed to determine if the results shown in our cohort are generalizable to all women seeking a minimally invasive option for the conservative treatment of symptomatic fibroids with pregnancy as a desired outcome. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding source for this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23081871     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jayapriya Jayakumaran; Sejal D Patel; Bhushan K Gangrade; Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian; Celso Silva
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 2.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Liselotte Mettler; Nicolai Maass; Johannes Ackermann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Aaron Varghese; Marisol Doglioli; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Identification and Validation of miRNA-TF-mRNA Regulatory Networks in Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Xiaotong Peng; Yanqun Mo; Junliang Liu; Huining Liu; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Fertility and Symptom Relief following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy.

Authors:  Michael C Pitter; Serene S Srouji; Antonio R Gargiulo; Leslie Kardos; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; Helen B Hubert; Glenn A Weitzman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2015-04-19

Review 6.  Robotics in Gynecology: Why is this Technology Worth Pursuing?

Authors:  Rodrigo Ayala-Yáñez; Emilio José Olaya-Guzmán; Javier Haghenbeck-Altamirano
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 7.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Rooma Sinha; Madhumati Sanjay; B Rupa; Samita Kumari
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Comparison of Long-Term Fertility and Bleeding Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy.

Authors:  Rebecca Flyckt; Enrique Soto; Benjamin Nutter; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-12-19

9.  Uterine rupture in pregnancy after robotic myomectomy.

Authors:  İsmet Hortu; Ali Akdemir; Fatih Şendağ; Mehmet Kemal Öztekin
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  Myomectomy by Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: Results at Foch Hospital, Paris.

Authors:  Jennifer Asmar; Marc Even; Marie Carbonnel; Julie Goetgheluck; Aurelie Revaux; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.