| Literature DB >> 31517307 |
Alicia Hernández Gutiérrez1, Emanuela Spagnolo2, Ignacio Zapardiel1, Rubén Garcia-Abadillo Seivane1, Ana López Carrasco1, Patricia Salas Bolívar1, Isabel Pascual Miguelañez3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare post-operative complications and recurrence of three surgical techniques: segmental resection, discoid excision and nodule shaving. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Colorectal resection; Discoid resection; Endometriosis; Laparoscopy; Shaving
Year: 2019 PMID: 31517307 PMCID: PMC6728789 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X ISSN: 2590-1613
Characteristics of patients and surgical data of the three groups (segmental resection, discoid resection, nodule shaving).
| Group I | Group II | Group III | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| segmental resection n: 76 | discoid resection n: 20 | nodule shaving n: 47 | ||
| Age, year Mean (SD) | 36.3 (5.6) | 34.9 (6.8) | 36.6 (5.8) | 0.5 |
| BMI, Mean (SD) | 21.8 (0.7) | 21.05 (1.2) | 21.6 (0.9) | 0.003 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | ||||
| Previous surgery n (%) | 66 (86.8%) | 7 (35%) | 23 (48.9%) | <0.001 |
| Operative Time (min) | 309 (43.6) | 285 (362) | 195 (25) | <0.001 |
| Mean (SD) | ||||
| Nodule localization n (%) | 0.02 | |||
| Rectum | 27 (37.5%) | 13 (68.4%) | 27 (65.9%) | |
| Sigmoid | 5 (6.9%) | 1 (5.3%) | 2 (4.9%) | |
| Recto-sigmoid | 40 (55.6%) | 5 (26.3%) | 12 (29.3%) | |
| Size of the Nodule (mm) mean (SD) | 32 (11.8) | 24 (10.6) | 17.9 (3.1) | <0.001 |
| Intraoperative Complications n (%) | 1(1.3%) | 0 | 5 (10.6%) | 0.02 |
Surgery associated in the three groups (segmental resection, discoid resection, nodule shaving).
| Endometriosis surgery associated | Group I- | Group II- | Group III | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| segmental resection n: 76 | discoid resection n: 20 | nodule shaving n: 47 | ||
| Hysterectomy+ salpingectomy n, % | 28 (36.8%) | 11 (55%) | 25 (53.2%) | 0.1 |
| Unilateral adnexectomy | 20 (26.3%) | 8 (40%) | 18 (38.3%) | 0.2 |
| Bilateral annexiectomy n, % | 7 (9.2%) | 4 (20%) | 4 (8.5%) | |
| Endometrioma n, % | 51 (67%) | 17 (85%), | 13 (27.6%) | <0.001 |
| Monolateral parametrium | 10 (13.2%) | 1 (5%) | 8 (17%) | 0.04 |
| Bilateral Parametrium n, % | 12 (15.8%) | 2 (10%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Rectovaginal nodule with partial colpectomy n, % | 24 (31.5) | 5 (25%) | 11 (23.4%) | 0.5 |
| Bilateral uterosacral ligament n, % | 30 (39.5%) | 6 (30%) | 19 (40.4%) | 0.9 |
| Monoteral uterosacral ligament n, % | 9 (11.8%) | 3 (15%) | 5 (10.6%) | |
| Bladder resection n, % | 5 (6.6%) | 1 (5%) | 0 (0%) | 0.2 |
| Ureter Reimplantation | 9 (11.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.1%) | 0.001 |
| Unilateral nodule | 10 (13.2%) | 3 (15%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Bilateral nodule | 7 (9.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Appendix | 7 (9.2%) | 2 (10%) | 1 (2.1%) | 0.2 |
| Ileum | 9 (11.8%) | 2 (10%) | 3 (6.4%) | 0.6 |
| Caecum | 2 (2.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.4 |
Post-operative data of the three groups (segmental resection, discoid resection, nodule shaving).
| Group I-segmental resection n: 76 | Group II-discoid resection n: 20 | Group III nodule shaving n: 47 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization, day Mean (DS) | 10.8 (6.5) | 6.3(2.4) | 10.5 (34.2) | 0.6 |
| Post-operative complications, n (%) | 0.005 | |||
| Dindo-Clavien Grade I | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (5%) | 2 (4.2%) | |
| Dindo-Clavien Grade II | 5 (6.5%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Dindo Clavien Grade IIIb | 12 (15.7%) | 1 (5%) | 0 | |
| Dindo-Clavien Grade IVa | 6 (7.8%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Recurrence | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (5%) | 6 (12.7%) | 0.01 |
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of recurrence in the three groups. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the shaving group compared with discoid and segmental resection groups (12.7% vs 5% vs 1.3%) (p = 0.01).