Literature DB >> 22034232

MRI and "tenderness guided" transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of recto-sigmoid endometriosis.

Luca Saba1, Stefano Guerriero, Rosa Sulcis, Monica Pilloni, Silvia Ajossa, Gianbenedetto Melis, Giorgio Mallarini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and "tenderness-guided" transvaginal ultrasonography (tg-TVUS) in the identification of recto-sigmoid endometriosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained, and written informed consent was given by all patients. This study is compliant with the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) method. Fifty-nine patients (mean age, 33 years; range, 21-44 years) with clinical suspicion of deep pelvic endometriosis were prospectively enrolled. They underwent tg-TVUS and MRI before surgery. The characteristics of the MRI signal were analyzed. Mapping of recto-sigmoid endometriosis was performed and tg-TVUS and MR imaging results were compared with surgical and pathological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) were calculated. Inter-technique concordance was assessed using the Cohen statistic, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained. Logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of recto-sigmoid endometriosis was 51%. The specificity, sensitivity, and LR+ and LR- were 90%, 73%, 7.089 and 0.297, respectively, for MRI and 86%, 73%, 5.317 and 0.309, respectively, for tg-TVUS. The presence of a high T1 signal spot was an excellent specific finding (100%) but was associated with a low sensitivity (30%). Inter-technique concordance using the Cohen statistic indicated a kappa value of 0.658 (± 0.098 SD). According to the logistic regression equation obtained, the use of both tg-TVUS and MRI allows optimal diagnostic performance.
CONCLUSION: MRI and tg-TVUS show similar results in the identification of recto-sigmoid endometriosis. The Cohen kappa value suggests that these methods may have complementary roles in the identification of recto-sigmoid endometriosis, depending on the site affected.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22034232     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Rosa Sulcis; Gian Benedetto Melis; Giannina Ibba; Juan Luis Alcazar; Mario Piga; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  Does the clinical information play a role in the magnetic resonance diagnostic confidence analysis of ovarian and deep endometriosis?

Authors:  Luca Saba; Silvia Ajossa; Giuseppe Ledda; Antonella Balestrieri; Federica Schirru; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Jasjit S Suri; Gian Benedetto Melis; Francesco Lavra; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Endometriosis: A Retrospective Analysis on Diagnostic Data in a Cohort of 4,401 Patients.

Authors:  Pietro G Signorile; Maria Cassano; Rosa Viceconte; Maria Spyrou; Valentina Marcattilj; Alfonso Baldi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  The importance and perspective of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bianek-Bodzak; Edyta Szurowska; Sambor Sawicki; Marcin Liro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  The 'sliding sign' in conjunction with sonovaginography: is this the optimal approach for the diagnosis of Pouch of Douglas obliteration and posterior compartment deep infiltrating endometriosis?

Authors:  Uche Menakaya; Shannon Reid; Fernando Infante; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  ENDORECT: a preoperative score to accurately predict rectosigmoid involvement in patients with endometriosis.

Authors:  C Chattot; C Huchon; A Paternostre; J Du Cheyron; E Chouillard; A Fauconnier
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-04-03

8.  Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Paula Carvalhal Moura; Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Ricardo Simões; Ulysses S Torres; Giuseppe D'Ippolito; Marc Bazot; Paulo Augusto Ayrosa Galvão Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Post-operative complications and recurrence rate after treatment of bowel endometriosis: Comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Alicia Hernández Gutiérrez; Emanuela Spagnolo; Ignacio Zapardiel; Rubén Garcia-Abadillo Seivane; Ana López Carrasco; Patricia Salas Bolívar; Isabel Pascual Miguelañez
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-07-12

10.  European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.