Literature DB >> 31517177

Expanded analysis of secondary germline findings from matched tumor/normal sequencing identifies additional clinically significant mutations.

E Ileana Dumbrava1, L Brusco2, M Daniels3,4, C Wathoo2, K Shaw2, K Lu3,4, X Zheng5, L Strong4, J Litton6, B Arun4,6, A K Eterovic7, M Routbort8, K Patel8, Yuan Qi5, S Piha-Paul1, V Subbiah1, D Hong1, J Rodon1,2,9, S Kopetz10, J Mendelsohn2,9, G B Mills2,7, K Chen2,5, F Meric-Bernstam1,2,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for tumor molecular profiling can reveal secondary germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (LPV/PV). The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recommends return of secondary results for a subset of 59 genes, but other genes with evidence of clinical utility are emerging. We previously reported that 4.3% of patients who underwent NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes had LPV/PV based on the ACMG list. Here we report the frequency of additional germline cancer-related gene variants and discuss their clinical utility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Matched tumor and germline DNA NGS of a targeted panel of 201 genes was performed in a research laboratory on samples from 1000 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors enrolled in a molecular testing protocol (NCT01772771). The frequency of germline LPV/PV in 54 cancer-related genes, beyond the genes in ACMG list, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 1000 patients who underwent tumor/normal DNA sequencing, 46 (4.6%) were found to have a germline LPV/PV in the following genes: AR-(5), ATM-(4), BAP1-(1), CDH1-(1), CDKN2A-(1), CHEK1-(2), CHEK2-(10), EGFR-(1), ERCC3-(4), ERCC5-(1), HNF1B-(1), HRAS-(1), MITF-(4), MLL3-(1), NF1-(3), PKHD1-(4), PTCH1-(1), and SMARCA4-(1). Thus, a total 8.7% of patients had an LPV/PV with 2 patients having 2 concomitant germline LPV/PV. Five mutations in high-penetrance hereditary cancer predisposition genes were selected to be returned to patients or their representatives: BAP1, CDH1, CDKN2A, EGFR, and SMARCA4.
CONCLUSIONS: Broader genomic testing is likely to identify additional secondary pathogenic germline alterations, some with potential clinical utility for return to patients and their relatives. The recommended genes for which germline results should be returned are continually changing, warranting continued study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NGS; hereditary cancer-related genes; matched tumor/normal DNA; next-generation sequencing; secondary germline variants

Year:  2019        PMID: 31517177      PMCID: PMC6741435          DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2473-4284


  38 in total

1.  Cancer Genetic Counselors' Current Practices and Attitudes Related to the Use of Tumor Profiling.

Authors:  LeAnne Noelle Goedde; Nathan W Stupiansky; Melissa Lah; Kimberly A Quaid; Stephanie Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Clinical actionability enhanced through deep targeted sequencing of solid tumors.

Authors:  Ken Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Hao Zhao; Qingxiu Zhang; Nader Ezzeddine; Lin-Ya Tang; Yuan Qi; Yong Mao; Tenghui Chen; Zechen Chong; Wanding Zhou; Xiaofeng Zheng; Amber Johnson; Kenneth D Aldape; Mark J Routbort; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Scott Kopetz; Michael A Davies; John de Groot; Stacy Moulder; Ravi Vinod; Carol J Farhangfar; Kenna Mills Shaw; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills; Agda Karina Eterovic
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines.

Authors:  Quan Li; Kai Wang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Germline Analysis from Tumor-Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings.

Authors:  Bryce A Seifert; Julianne M O'Daniel; Krunal Amin; Daniel S Marchuk; Nirali M Patel; Joel S Parker; Alan P Hoyle; Lisle E Mose; Andrew Marron; Michele C Hayward; Christopher Bizon; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; James P Evans; H Shelton Earp; Norman E Sharpless; D Neil Hayes; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Incidental germline variants in 1000 advanced cancers on a prospective somatic genomic profiling protocol.

Authors:  F Meric-Bernstam; L Brusco; M Daniels; C Wathoo; A M Bailey; L Strong; K Shaw; K Lu; Y Qi; H Zhao; H Lara-Guerra; J Litton; B Arun; A K Eterovic; U Aytac; M Routbort; V Subbiah; F Janku; M A Davies; S Kopetz; J Mendelsohn; G B Mills; K Chen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  Marilyn M Li; Michael Datto; Eric J Duncavage; Shashikant Kulkarni; Neal I Lindeman; Somak Roy; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Daynna J Wolff; Anas Younes; Marina N Nikiforova
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Tumor profiling and the incidentalome: patient decisions and risks.

Authors:  Erin Hofstatter; Karishma Mehra; Melinda Yushak; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Clinical Application of Multigene Panels: Challenges of Next-Generation Counseling and Cancer Risk Management.

Authors:  Thomas Paul Slavin; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Ilana Solomon; Bita Nehoray; Christina Rybak; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes.

Authors:  Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tumor and Constitutional Sequencing for Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Authors:  Schuyler Tong; W Patrick Devine; Joseph T Shieh
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-05

Review 2.  Integrating Somatic and Germline Next-Generation Sequencing Into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice.

Authors:  J Kevin Hicks; Rachel Howard; Phillip Reisman; Jacob J Adashek; Karen K Fields; Jhanelle E Gray; Bryan McIver; Kelly McKee; Mandy F O'Leary; Randa M Perkins; Edmondo Robinson; Ankita Tandon; Jamie K Teer; Joseph Markowitz; Dana E Rollison
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 3.  Next-Generation Sequencing of Advanced GI Tumors Reveals Individual Treatment Options.

Authors:  Michael Bitzer; Leonie Ostermann; Marius Horger; Saskia Biskup; Martin Schulze; Kristina Ruhm; Franz Hilke; Öznur Öner; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christopher Schroeder; Olaf Riess; Falko Fend; Daniel Zips; Martina Hinterleitner; Lars Zender; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Janina Beha; Nisar P Malek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-03-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.