Literature DB >> 27083775

Germline Analysis from Tumor-Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings.

Bryce A Seifert1,2, Julianne M O'Daniel1,2, Krunal Amin1, Daniel S Marchuk1, Nirali M Patel2,3, Joel S Parker1,2, Alan P Hoyle2, Lisle E Mose2, Andrew Marron2, Michele C Hayward2, Christopher Bizon4, Kirk C Wilhelmsen1,4, James P Evans1,2, H Shelton Earp2, Norman E Sharpless1,2, D Neil Hayes2, Jonathan S Berg1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate germline variants in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes among unselected cancer patients undergoing tumor-germline sequencing. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Germline sequence data from 439 individuals undergoing tumor-germline dyad sequencing through the LCCC1108/UNCseq™ (NCT01457196) study were analyzed for genetic variants in 36 hereditary cancer susceptibility genes. These variants were analyzed as an exploratory research study to determine whether pathogenic variants exist within the germline of patients undergoing tumor-germline sequencing. Patients were unselected with respect to indicators of hereditary cancer predisposition.
RESULTS: Variants indicative of hereditary cancer predisposition were identified in 19 (4.3%) patients. For about half (10/19), these findings represent new diagnostic information with potentially important implications for the patient and their family. The others were previously identified through clinical genetic evaluation secondary to suspicion of a hereditary cancer predisposition. Genes with pathogenic variants included ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, and CHEK2 In contrast, a substantial proportion of patients (178, 40.5%) had Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), 24 of which had VUS in genes pertinent to the presenting cancer. Another 143 had VUS in other hereditary cancer genes, and 11 had VUS in both pertinent and nonpertinent genes.
CONCLUSIONS: Germline analysis in tumor-germline sequencing dyads will occasionally reveal significant germline findings that were clinically occult, which could be beneficial for patients and their families. However, given the low yield for unexpected germline variation and the large proportion of patients with VUS results, analysis and return of germline results should adhere to guidelines for secondary findings rather than diagnostic hereditary cancer testing. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4087-94. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Mandelker, p. 3987. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27083775      PMCID: PMC4987173          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  42 in total

1.  Isaac: ultra-fast whole-genome secondary analysis on Illumina sequencing platforms.

Authors:  Come Raczy; Roman Petrovski; Christopher T Saunders; Ilya Chorny; Semyon Kruglyak; Elliott H Margulies; Han-Yu Chuang; Morten Källberg; Swathi A Kumar; Arnold Liao; Kristina M Little; Michael P Strömberg; Stephen W Tanner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Haploinsufficiency of CBFA2 causes familial thrombocytopenia with propensity to develop acute myelogenous leukaemia.

Authors:  W J Song; M G Sullivan; R D Legare; S Hutchings; X Tan; D Kufrin; J Ratajczak; I C Resende; C Haworth; R Hock; M Loh; C Felix; D C Roy; L Busque; D Kurnit; C Willman; A M Gewirtz; N A Speck; J H Bushweller; F P Li; K Gardiner; M Poncz; J M Maris; D G Gilliland
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  The evolution of colorectal cancer genetics-Part 1: from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Ronald A Gagliano; Susan Seto-Donlon; Faye Eggerding; Timothy Donlon; Jeffrey Berenberg; Henry T Lynch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10

4.  Are physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer appropriate? A population-based study.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Tracey Fredricks; Lache Wilkins; Irene Roelfsema; Kaijun Liao; Judy A Shea; Peter Groeneveld; Susan M Domchek; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA.

Authors:  Kasmintan A Schrader; Donavan T Cheng; Vijai Joseph; Meera Prasad; Michael Walsh; Ahmet Zehir; Ai Ni; Tinu Thomas; Ryma Benayed; Asad Ashraf; Annie Lincoln; Maria Arcila; Zsofia Stadler; David Solit; David M Hyman; David Hyman; Liying Zhang; David Klimstra; Marc Ladanyi; Kenneth Offit; Michael Berger; Mark Robson
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Most patients with colorectal tumors at young age do not visit a cancer genetics clinic.

Authors:  Lucia I H Overbeek; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Joannes H J M van Krieken; Fokko M Nagengast; Theo J M Ruers; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Rosella P M G Hermens
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Combined Targeted DNA Sequencing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Using UNCseq and NGScopy, and RNA Sequencing Using UNCqeR for the Detection of Genetic Aberrations in NSCLC.

Authors:  Xiaobei Zhao; Anyou Wang; Vonn Walter; Nirali M Patel; David A Eberhard; Michele C Hayward; Ashley H Salazar; Heejoon Jo; Matthew G Soloway; Matthew D Wilkerson; Joel S Parker; Xiaoying Yin; Guosheng Zhang; Marni B Siegel; Gary B Rosson; H Shelton Earp; Norman E Sharpless; Margaret L Gulley; Karen E Weck; D Neil Hayes; Stergios J Moschos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients.

Authors:  Holly LaDuca; A J Stuenkel; Jill S Dolinsky; Steven Keiles; Stephany Tandy; Tina Pesaran; Elaine Chen; Chia-Ling Gau; Erika Palmaer; Kamelia Shoaepour; Divya Shah; Virginia Speare; Stephanie Gandomi; Elizabeth Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?

Authors:  Debu Tripathy; Kathleen Harnden; Kimberly Blackwell; Mark Robson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Institutional implementation of clinical tumor profiling on an unselected cancer population.

Authors:  Lynette M Sholl; Khanh Do; Priyanka Shivdasani; Ethan Cerami; Adrian M Dubuc; Frank C Kuo; Elizabeth P Garcia; Yonghui Jia; Phani Davineni; Ryan P Abo; Trevor J Pugh; Paul van Hummelen; Aaron R Thorner; Matthew Ducar; Alice H Berger; Mizuki Nishino; Katherine A Janeway; Alanna Church; Marian Harris; Lauren L Ritterhouse; Joshua D Campbell; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Azra H Ligon; Shakti Ramkissoon; James M Cleary; Ursula Matulonis; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Richard Chao; Vanessa Tassell; James Christensen; William C Hahn; Philip W Kantoff; David J Kwiatkowski; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson; Levi A Garraway; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Barrett J Rollins; Neal I Lindeman; Laura E MacConaill
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.

Authors:  Diana Mandelker; Liying Zhang; Yelena Kemel; Zsofia K Stadler; Vijai Joseph; Ahmet Zehir; Nisha Pradhan; Angela Arnold; Michael F Walsh; Yirong Li; Anoop R Balakrishnan; Aijazuddin Syed; Meera Prasad; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria I Carlo; Karen A Cadoo; Meg Sheehan; Megan H Fleischut; Erin Salo-Mullen; Magan Trottier; Steven M Lipkin; Anne Lincoln; Semanti Mukherjee; Vignesh Ravichandran; Roy Cambria; Jesse Galle; Wassim Abida; Marcia E Arcila; Ryma Benayed; Ronak Shah; Kenneth Yu; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan A Coleman; Steven D Leach; Maeve A Lowery; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Philip W Kantoff; Charles L Sawyers; Maura N Dickler; Leonard Saltz; Robert J Motzer; Eileen M O'Reilly; Howard I Scher; Jose Baselga; David S Klimstra; David B Solit; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; Marc Ladanyi; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  VHL substrate transcription factor ZHX2 as an oncogenic driver in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Tao Wu; Jeremy Simon; Mamoru Takada; Ryoichi Saito; Cheng Fan; Xian-De Liu; Eric Jonasch; Ling Xie; Xian Chen; Xiaosai Yao; Bin Tean Teh; Patrick Tan; Xingnan Zheng; Mingjie Li; Cortney Lawrence; Jie Fan; Jiang Geng; Xijuan Liu; Lianxin Hu; Jun Wang; Chengheng Liao; Kai Hong; Giada Zurlo; Joel S Parker; J Todd Auman; Charles M Perou; W Kimryn Rathmell; William Y Kim; Marc W Kirschner; William G Kaelin; Albert S Baldwin; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Analysis of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes using next-generation sequencing in women with triple negative breast cancer from South India.

Authors:  Taruna Rajagopal; Arun Seshachalam; Arunachalam Jothi; Krishna Kumar Rathnam; Srikanth Talluri; Sivaramakrishnan Venkatabalasubranian; Nageswara Rao Dunna
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Identification of Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations in Solid Tumor Patients Undergoing Unpaired Next-Generation Sequencing Assays.

Authors:  Catherine C Coombs; Nancy K Gillis; Xianming Tan; Jonathan S Berg; Markus Ball; Maria E Balasis; Nathan D Montgomery; Kelly L Bolton; Joel S Parker; Tania E Mesa; Sean J Yoder; Michele C Hayward; Nirali M Patel; Kristy L Richards; Christine M Walko; Todd C Knepper; John T Soper; Jared Weiss; Juneko E Grilley-Olson; William Y Kim; H Shelton Earp; Ross L Levine; Elli Papaemmanuil; Ahmet Zehir; D Neil Hayes; Eric Padron
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Expanded analysis of secondary germline findings from matched tumor/normal sequencing identifies additional clinically significant mutations.

Authors:  E Ileana Dumbrava; L Brusco; M Daniels; C Wathoo; K Shaw; K Lu; X Zheng; L Strong; J Litton; B Arun; A K Eterovic; M Routbort; K Patel; Yuan Qi; S Piha-Paul; V Subbiah; D Hong; J Rodon; S Kopetz; J Mendelsohn; G B Mills; K Chen; F Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11

8.  Precision oncology in the age of integrative genomics.

Authors:  Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Assigning clinical meaning to somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing data in a prospective cancer precision medicine study.

Authors:  Arezou A Ghazani; Nelly M Oliver; Joseph P St Pierre; Andrea Garofalo; Irene R Rainville; Elaine Hiller; Daniel J Treacy; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Sam Wood; Elizabeth Bair; Michael Parello; Franklin Huang; Marios Giannakis; Frederick H Wilson; Elizabeth H Stover; Steven M Corsello; Tom Nguyen; Huma Q Rana; Alanna J Church; Carol Lowenstein; Carrie Cibulskis; Ali Amin-Mansour; Jennifer Heng; Lauren Brais; Abigail Santos; Patrick Bauer; Amanda Waldron; Peter Lo; Megan Gorman; Christine A Lydon; Marisa Welch; Philip McNamara; Stacey Gabriel; Lynette M Sholl; Neal I Lindeman; Judy E Garber; Steven Joffe; Eliezer M Van Allen; Stacy W Gray; Pasi A Ja Nne; Levi A Garraway; Nikhil Wagle
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Evolving Significance of Tumor-Normal Sequencing in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Diana Mandelker; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.