| Literature DB >> 31514454 |
Xingjian Wen1,2,3, Jinlong Guo4,5,6, Di Sun7,8,9, Mingshu Wang10,11,12, Dian Cao13,14,15, Anchun Cheng16,17,18, Dekang Zhu19,20,21, Mafeng Liu22,23,24, Xinxin Zhao25,26,27, Qiao Yang28,29,30, Shun Chen31,32,33, Renyong Jia34,35,36, Ying Wu37,38,39, Shaqiu Zhang40,41,42, Sai Mao43,44,45, Xumin Ou46,47,48, Xiaoyue Chen49,50,51, Yanling Yu52,53,54, Ling Zhang55,56,57, Yunya Liu58,59,60, Bin Tian61,62, Leichang Pan63,64, Mujeeb Ur Rehman65,66.
Abstract
Duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV) is prevalent worldwide and has caused significant economic losses. As the predominant serotype in China, DHAV-3 has become a major challenge to the local duck industry. Here the genetics and pathogenesis of a virulent DHAV-3 strain and its embryo-passaged strain were assessed. There were only two amino acid substitutions (Y164N in VP0 protein and L71I in 2C protein) introduced during the adaptation process. The pathogenicity of these strains was further evaluated in vivo. Clinical signs, gross pathology, and histopathological analysis showed that the embryo-passaged strain was attenuated. Meanwhile, the viral RNA loads were significantly lower in the liver tissues of the ducklings infected with the attenuated strain. As expected, infection with the virulent and attenuated strains led to the activation of different innate immune genes. We suspected that the loss of replication efficiency in ducklings was responsible for the attenuation phenotype of the embryo-passaged strain. In addition, different innate immune responses in the liver of ducklings were at least partly responsible for the differential infectivity phenotype. These findings provide new insights into the genetics and pathogenesis of DHAV-3, which may aid the development of new vaccines and the implementation of immunization strategies.Entities:
Keywords: attenuation; cytokine; duck hepatitis A virus; genetics; hepatic injury; innate immune response; intense inflammation; pathogenicity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31514454 PMCID: PMC6789628 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines7030111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Sequences of the primers for qRT-PCR analysis.
| Target Gene | Sense Primer (5’-3’) | Antisense Primer (5’-3’) |
|---|---|---|
| β-actin | TACGCCAACACGGTGCTG | GATTCATCATACTCCTGCTTG |
| TLR-3 | AACACTCCGCCTAAGTATCAT | CTATCCTCCACCCTTCAAAA |
| TLR-7 | CCTTTCCCAGAGAGCATTCA | TCAAGAAATATCAAGATAATCACATCA |
| MDA5 | CTGCCCGCTACTTGAACTCCA | GCACCATCTCTGTTCCCACGA |
| RIG-1 | GCGTACCGCTATAACCCACA | CCTTGCTGGTTTTGAACGC |
| NLRP-3 | CATCCCAGTGAAGCGTTGA | GCCATCTGGTCGTATAGCG |
| IFN-α | TCCACCTCCTCCAACACCTC | TGGGAAGCAGCGCTCGAG |
| IFN-β | CCTCAACCAGATCCAGCATT | GGATGAGGCTGTGAGAGGAG |
| IFN-γ | GCTGATGGCAATCCTGTTTT | GGATTTTCAAGCCAGTCAGC |
| IL-1β | TCGACATCAACCAGAAGTGC | GAGCTTGTAGCCCTTGATGC |
| IL-2 | TCCCTGAATTTCGCCAAG | AGCGGACAGCAAGTTAGGTAGC |
| IL-4 | TACCTCAACTTGCTGCACATC | GCTACTCGTTGGAGGGTTCT |
| IL-6 | TTCGACGAGGAGAAATGCTT | CCTTATCGTCGTTGCCAGAT |
| IL-10 | AGCAGCGAGCACCACCA | TGCCGTTCTCGTTCATCTTT |
| TNF-α | TTTTATGACCGCCCAGTT | TAGGCAGAGGCCACCA |
Figure 1A schematic representation of the duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV)-3 genome. Comparative genomic analysis showed that there were two nucleotide substitutions (T1142A and C4334A) during the adaptation process, which led to two amino acid mutations in the VP0 (at residue 164) and 2C (at residue 71) proteins, respectively.
Figure 2Viral titers of the virulent parental DHAV-3 strain and related embryo-adapted strain in the allantoic fluid of ducklings. The relative viral RNA load in the allantoic fluid was measured using qRT-PCR analyses. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the p values and 95% confidence levels. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3(A) Survival rate of ducklings inoculated with the virulent DHAV-3 strain, related embryo-adapted strain, or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Ducklings were inoculated through the intramuscular route. (B) Gross pathology of the liver tissues of ducklings after viral infection. At 36 hpi, the livers of the diseased ducklings were harvested for gross pathological assessment. The liver tissues of ducklings inoculated with the virulent strain exhibited obvious gross lesions, with punctate hemorrhaging and ecchymosis, whereas the liver tissues of the ducklings inoculated with the attenuated strain or PBS had no obvious lesions.
Figure 4Histopathologic lesions detected in the liver tissues of ducklings inoculated with the virulent DHAV-3 strain (A–F), related embryo-adapted strain (G–L), and PBS (M–R). The livers had vacuolation and necrosis of hepatocytes (black arrows in B and C), a large number of infiltrating inflammatory cells, and multifocal confluent coagulative necrosis (black arrows in D and E).
Figure 5In vitro growth kinetics of the virulent strain and its embryo-passaged strain of DHAV-3 in the liver tissues of ducklings. The relative viral RNA load in liver tissues was measured by qRT-PCR. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the p values and 95% confidence levels. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 (***) vs. the control group.
Figure 6Dynamic activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) genes in the livers of inoculated ducklings. Expression levels of these genes were detected by qRT-PCR analyses and analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the p values and 95% confidence levels. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7Dynamic activation of IFNs genes in the livers of inoculated ducklings. Expression levels of these genes were detected by qRT-PCR analyses and analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the p values and 95% confidence levels. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 (***) vs. the control group.
Figure 8Dynamic activation of proinflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory cytokines genes in the livers of inoculated ducklings. Expression levels of these genes were detected by qRT-PCR analyses and analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to calculate the p values and 95% confidence levels. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 (***) vs. the control group.