| Literature DB >> 29137226 |
Xumin Ou1,2, Sai Mao1,2, Jingyu Cao1,2, Yunchao Ma1,2, Guangpeng Ma3, Anchun Cheng1,2,4, Mingshu Wang1,2,4, Dekang Zhu2,4, Shun Chen1,2,4, Renyong Jia1,2,4, Mafeng Liu1,2,4, Kunfeng Sun1,2,4, Qiao Yang1,2,4, Ying Wu1,2,4, Xiaoyue Chen2,4.
Abstract
Duck Hepatitis A Virus (DHAV) belongs to the Avihepatovirus, which is also classified into Picornaviridae with Hepatovirus, Hepatitis A Virus (HAV). In humans, the pathogenesis of HAV is not well understood because of limited work with animal models. Here, we investigated the progress of duck viral hepatitis caused by DHAV and their potential for dissecting the pathogenesis of HAV. During the course of infection, the duck model had undergone hepatocellular lesions (vacuolation, acidophilic degeneration and steatosis), lymphocytes recruitment (neutrophil granulocytes, heterophilic granulocytes and T cells or plasm cells) and repair (activation of hepatic stellate cells, fibrosis and regeneration). Coincident with liver injury, the serum biomarkers, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase were significantly increased. Moreover, comparatively lower CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were recruited to the liver, which might lead to a persistent infection (40 wk). Because DHAV and HAV have similar genomic structure, biological phenotypes and can easily replicate in liver. And half of fibrosis-related genes had high homology between humans and ducks. Considering these similarity in pathological and virological phenotypes, we proposed that the ducks might be an alternatively small animal model that would provide insight into the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis, fibrosis and liver regeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Pathology Section; duck hepatitis A virus; liver injury; pathogenesis; viral hepatitis; viral-host interaction
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137226 PMCID: PMC5669852 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Microscopic lesions in mature ducks experimentally infected with DHAV-1 H strain
Representative liver HE staining from 1d to 280d post-infection with DHAV are displayed from two stages, early infection and later infection (n = 5). (Con) represents pre-inoculation liver photomicrograph. The brightness and contrast are slightly modified to create a uniform background.
The hepatitis activity during the course of infection.
| Phases | Early hepatocellular injury | Later hepatocellular injury | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | 2d | 6d | 10d | 21d | 28d | 56d | 112d | 140d | 168d | 224d | 280d | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 7 | |
The hepatitis activity scored by knodell Histological Activity Index (HAI) score system. The total score was calculated by four indexes, such as periportal +/- bridging necrosis, intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis, portal inflammation and fibrosis. The HAI scores were assessed by three diagnose pathologists.
Figure 2Biochemical detection of serum from ducks infected with DHVA-H
Serum biochemical markers, ALT, AST, triglyceride, total Bilrubin, total protein, albumin, globulin and ratio of albumin and globulin, were analysed by auto biochemical detector. The scope between two dash lines was the normal biochemical reference range in human. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05 indicates significant difference using student’s T-test.
Figure 3Flow cytometry analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in liver (n = 3)
The percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were detected by FITC-conjugated goat anti mouse IgG. A. Flow cytometry analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from 10 dpi to 280dpi. B. Significant difference analysis of positive CD4+ T cells in the course of infection. C. Significant difference analysis of positive CD8+ T cells in the course of infection. D. Significant difference analysis of between positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the course of infection. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05 indicates significant difference using student’s T-test. ns, no significance.
Figure 4Dynamic immune-related gene expression profiles induced by DHAV-H strain and also the viral loads in liver
A. Immune-related genes are displayed in each part according to their biological functions, such as the activation of innate immune responses (TLR7, TLR3, RIG-1 and MDA5), effective interferons (IFN-α/β/γ) and interleukins (IL-1β/2/4/6), chemokines (CCL19/21), MHC-I and MHC-II, β-defensin, and B cell activating factor (BAFF). The relative values for each immune related genes were calculated by 2-ΔΔCt method by comparing with the non-infected group. The viral RNA copies (Log10/g) and their percentage in each group are displayed at the bottom right. Data are represented as mean +/- SD (n = 5). B. In order to understand the impact of virulence on immune networks, the correlations of each pair of immune related genes (P < 0.05 at least) were calculated using correlation analysis (Pearson). C. Those correlated pairs of immune related genes were visualized as immune network by Cytoscape software.
Figure 5Microscopic lesions in the liver of duck embryos experimentally infected with DHAV-1 H strain
A. Representative liver HE staining from 8-hpi to 48-hpi of DHAV is displayed (n = 3). Typical histopathological changes are exemplified at the corner of each photograph. (Con) represents pre-inoculation liver photomicrograph. B. Representative liver DHAV staining by IHC. C. The relative intensity of positive DHAV staining was calculated by Image-Pro Plus software. 100% Integral Optical Density (IOD ) was defined as the most positive staining in the course of infection. The significant levels of their expression were analysed by Student’s T-test, two way. D. The positive 3Dpro staining intensity of infected cells was significantly higher than the adjacent cells. E. Representative 3D protein staining at 24-hpi. The infected cells and adjacent cells were labelled. NS, No significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The brightness and contrast are slightly modified to create a uniform background.
Figure 6Microscopic lesions and virus replication of duck embryo HSCs infected with DHAV-1 H strain
A. Representative duck embryo HSC HE staining (n = 2). B. Virus detection through indirect immunofluorescence after DHAV infection from 12-hpi to 60-hpi are displayed on the left and right (n = 2). C. The relative cell numbers were calculated by Image-Pro Plus software. D.The intensity of positive staining were also calculated by Image-Pro Plus software. The significant levels of their expression or numbers were analysed by Student’s T-test. NS, No significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The relative cell numbers was calculated by comparing the slides with maximum cells (1.0). The 100% Integral Optical Density (IOD) intensity was defined as the slides with the most positive staining. The brightness and contrast are slightly modified to create a uniform background.
Figure 7Comparatively phylogenetic relationship with “Hepatitis A virus” and fibrosis-related genes in humans and ducks and the process of liver injury and repair during DHAV infection
A. The phylogenetic tree of the DHAV-related genes was constructed from the complete genomic sequences of the picornaviruses using the neighbour-joining method. B. The complete amino acid sequences of the fibrosis-related genes in the genomes of humans and ducks were used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the neighbour-joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown above the branches. C. The duck has a similar liver disease caused by avian hepatropic virus (DHAV). This virus can also be cultured in duck embryos or its primary cells. During the period of infection, virus rapidly replicates to a high level, and then the transient cytokine storm reduces the virus to a comparatively lower level and gradually disappears until 280dpi. Hepatocellular injury was characterized as vacuolar degeneration, steatosis and apoptosis at early stage of infection. While those injured cells were replaced by collagenous fiber at later stage of infection. Those fibres may be secreted by myofibroblast when hepatic stellate cells were activated by injured liver cells. Meanwhile, strong recruitment of plasmocytes and heterophilic granulocytes were identified by HE assays. However, the comparatively lower CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells recruited to liver might lead to a persistent infection. Those immune cells may combine with interferons and interleukins to eradicate viral replication from liver.