Emerging evidence demonstrates that dysregulation of circular RNA is linked to tumorigenesis and aggressive progression. However, its role in oral squamous cell carcinoma remains largely uncharacterized. In this study, we identified a novel metastasis-associated circular RNA, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (hsa_circ_0001162, a circular RNA derived from matrix metalloproteinase 9), which was remarkably upregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma and positively correlated with matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression. Patients with high circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression were prone to lymph node metastasis and an advanced TNM stage. Importantly, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 was identified as an efficacious diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Functional experiments showed that depletion of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 weakened the migratory and invasive capabilities of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro as well as inhibited lung metastasis in vivo. Regarding the mechanism, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 could simultaneously interact with AUF1 and miR-149 to block the inhibitory effect of AUF1 and miR-149 on matrix metalloproteinase 9 3'-untranslated region, resulting in enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 9 messenger RNA stability, thereby facilitating oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Collectively, our data indicate that circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 acts as a metastasis-promoting gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma through regulating the messenger RNA stability of its parental gene. Therapeutic targeting of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 may be a promising treatment intervention for metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Emerging evidence demonstrates that dysregulation of circular RNA is linked to tumorigenesis and aggressive progression. However, its role in oral squamous cell carcinoma remains largely uncharacterized. In this study, we identified a novel metastasis-associated circular RNA, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (hsa_circ_0001162, a circular RNA derived from matrix metalloproteinase 9), which was remarkably upregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma and positively correlated with matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression. Patients with high circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression were prone to lymph node metastasis and an advanced TNM stage. Importantly, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 was identified as an efficacious diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinomapatients. Functional experiments showed that depletion of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 weakened the migratory and invasive capabilities of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro as well as inhibited lung metastasis in vivo. Regarding the mechanism, circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 could simultaneously interact with AUF1 and miR-149 to block the inhibitory effect of AUF1 and miR-149 on matrix metalloproteinase 9 3'-untranslated region, resulting in enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 9 messenger RNA stability, thereby facilitating oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Collectively, our data indicate that circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 acts as a metastasis-promoting gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma through regulating the messenger RNA stability of its parental gene. Therapeutic targeting of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 may be a promising treatment intervention for metastatic oral squamous cell carcinomapatients.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the main pathological type of oral cancer
(accounting for approximately 90% of cases) and the eighth most common malignant tumor worldwide[1]. It is still considered a lethal disease, especially in India and South East Asia[2]. Although great efforts have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of OSCC in
recent decades, the 5-year survival rate is still very low, especially in patients with
metastasis (less than 40%)[3]. Therefore, continued in-depth research into the pathogenesis of OSCC is urgently
needed to provide new therapeutic interventions for patients with OSCC.Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) belong to the zinc-dependent endopeptidase family and are
widely distributed in the extracellular environment of various tissues. They can promote the
degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM), which enables them to participate in cancer dissemination[4]. Among them, MMP9 has been extensively studied and is highly expressed in a variety
of malignant tumors, including OSCC[5]. Accumulating evidence suggests that MMP9 plays a key positive regulator in OSCC cell
migration and invasion across basement membranes[6]. OSCCpatients with high MMP9 expression are closely associated with metastatic
clinical features and worse prognosis[7]. Although the important biological functions of MMP9 have been clearly elucidated,
the mechanism of its dysregulation is still unclear.Circular RNA (circRNA) is a special type of non-coding RNA characterized by a covalently
closed ring structure, which is widely expressed in eukaryotes and functions in a tissue and
developmental-stage specific pattern[8]. It is generated by the tail-to-head splicing of its host gene pre-messenger RNA (mRNA)[9]. Emerging evidence shows that circRNA participates in cancer initiation, development,
and progression through regulation of its host gene via different mechanisms. For instance,
circ-ITGA7 localized in the cytoplasm increased ITGA7 expression via sponging miR-370-3p and
inactivating the oncogenic RAS signaling pathway[10]. Circ-FLI1 located in the nucleus promoted breast cancermetastasis by epigenetic
upregulation of FLI1 via coordinately regulating TET1 and DNMT1[11]. Circ-YAP was reported to negatively modulate YAP expression via suppression of Yap
translation initiation[12]. These studies reveal that circRNA is a compelling regulator of its host gene in
humancancer.Here, we screened circRNAs derived from MMP9 and found that circ-MMP9 (hsa_circ_0001162)
could regulate MMP9 expression in OSCC. The clinical significance, biological function, and
potential mechanisms of action of circ-MMP9 have been further studied.
Materials and Methods
OSCC Tissues, Plasma and Cell Lines
A total of 74 paired OSCC and corresponding non-tumor normal tissues were collected from
the Department of Stomatology, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital. The tissues were stored in
liquid nitrogen before use. None of the patients received preoperative anti-cancer
treatment. All patients provided handwritten informed consent and were followed up every 3
months. We also collected plasma samples from 16 healthy control and 25 OSCCpatients to
detect the expression level of circ-MMP9. This study was approved by the ethics committee
of Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital. OSCC cell lines including HN4, UM1, SCC-9, SCC-15, HSC-3,
and CAL-27 and the normal oral keratinocyte (NOK) cells were all obtained from the Cell
Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and routinely cultured based on
the manufacturer’s instructions.
Reverse Transcription and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reverse
transcribed into complementary DNA, followed by quantification of RNA expression using
SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (SinoBio, Beijing, China) and calculation using a
2−ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences used in this study are as follows:hsa_circ_0001161: Forward: 5′-AGCTGACTCGACGGTGATG-3′, Reverse: 5′-GCTTGTCCCGGTCGTAGTT-3′;
hsa_circ_0060571: Forward: 5′-TCTGGAGGAAAGGGAGGAGT-3′, Reverse: 5′-GGTGTGGTGGTGGTTGGAG-3;
hsa_circ_0001162: Forward: 5′-GAGGAAAGGGAGGAGTGGAG-3′, Reverse: 5′-AGGCTTTCTCTCGGTACTGG-3;
MMP9: Forward: 5′-ACTGTCCACCCCTCAGAGC-3′, Reverse: 5′-CGTCGAAGATGTTCACGTTG-3; GAPDH:
Forward: 5′-GGCCTCCAAGGAGTAAGACC-3′, Reverse: 5′-AGGGGTCTACATGGCAACTG-3.
Establishment of Stable Circ-MMP9 Knockdown Cell Lines and Cell Transfection
The sequence targeting the circ-MMP9 junction site was inserted into PLCDH-ciR lentiviral
vector (Geneseed, Guangzhou, China). The vector was then infected into OSCC UM1 and HSC-3
cells using EnvirusTM enhancement reagent (Engreen, Auckland, NZ), followed by
selection using puromycin for 3 days. For transient transfection, AUF1 siRNA (RiboBio,
Guangzhou, China), miR-149 mimics and inhibitors (GenePharma, Shanghai, China), and MMP9
pcDNA3.1 expression plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were transfected into UM1 and
HSC-3 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with
the manufacturers’ protocols.
Western Blot
Total protein was isolated and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane,
followed by blocking using defatted milk powder and incubation with corresponding primary
and secondary antibodies. The membrane was then visualized using enhanced
chemiluminescence solution (Beyotime, Beijing, China). The primary antibodies used were:
anti-MMP9 (1:1000 dilution, #13667, CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-AUF1 (1:5000 dilution,
#12382, CST, Danvers, MA, USA); and anti-GAPDH (1:10000 dilution, #HRP-60004, Proteintech,
Rosemont, IL, USA).
Cell Migration and Invasion Assays
For migration assay, the wound was generated by using a sterile pipette tip after UM1 and
HSC-3 cells grew to 80–90% confluence. After 48 hours, the wound healing area was
calculated using Image J software. For the invasion assay, cells were seeded on a 24-well
culture plate coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), followed by
staining and photography of cells located on the lower surface after 16 hours.
Experimental Lung Metastasis Model
A total of 18 nude mice were randomly divided into three groups (sh-NC, sh-circ-MMP9#1,
and sh-circ-MMP9#2; n=6 per group). A total of 1 × 106 UM1
cells suspended in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were tail-vein injected into nude mice.
Lung metastasis was monitored weekly using an IVIS Lumina II system. After 6 weeks, all
mice were sacrificed and the lung metastasis nodules were counted. The animal study was
approved by the Animal Policy and Welfare Committee of Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital.
Luciferase Reporter Assay
To evaluate the effect of circ-MMP9 on MMP9 promoter activity, the promoter sequence was
subcloned into pGL3-basic luciferase vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), followed by
transfection into circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. To evaluate the relationship
between miR-149 and circ-MMP9/MMP9, the full-length sequences of circ-MMP9 and MMP9
3′-untranslated region (UTR) containing the wild-type or mutant miR-149 binding site were
inserted into pmirGLO vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Then, the pmirGLO vectors and
miR-149 mimics were co-transfected into UM1 and HSC-3 cells. The luciferase activity was
detected after 48 hours of transfection by a dual-luciferase reporter system as per the
standard protocols (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
RNA Pull-down and Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay
RNA pull-down assay was performed using PierceTM Magnetic RNA-Protein
Pull-Down Kit (#20164, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with biotinylated
control or circ-MMP9 probe in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed by Western blot analysis for
AUF1 protein expression and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for miR-183 and
miR-149 expression. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) was carried out using RIP™
RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) in
accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols, followed by qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9
expression.
Analysis of Circ-MMP9 Localization
For nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation assay, the cytoplasmic and nuclear RNAs were
extracted and subjected to qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 expression. As internal
references for cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, 18 s and U6 were used, respectively.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was performed using the FISH kit (RiboBio,
Guangzhou, China) and Cy3-labed circ-MMP9 probe based on the manufacturer’s manual with
minor modifications.
Data Statistics
All data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software. Specifically, classified and
continuous variables were tested by Chi-square test and Student’s t-test,
respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to evaluate the survival time of OSCCpatients based on median circ-MMP9 expression value. The correlation between circ-MMP9 and
MMP9 expression was determined by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. A p
value less than 0.05 is considered statistically different.
Results
Circ-MMP9 is Overexpressed in OSCC and Positively Correlated with MMP9
Expression
Through the analysis of circBase database, we found that MMP9 can form three circRNAs:
hsa_circ_0001161, hsa_circ_0060571, and hsa_circ_0001162 (circ-MMP9). We then assessed the
expression levels of these three circRNAs in 74 paired tissues. As shown in Figure 1(a), only circ-MMP9 was
significantly upregulated in OSCC tissues in comparison to adjacent normal tissues.
Similar results were also observed in OSCC cell lines, especially in UM1 and HSC-3 cells
with highly metastatic capacity (Figure
1(b)). Further, we found that circ-MMP9 expression was closely related to lymph
node metastasis (p=0.002) and clinical TNM stage
(p=0.005), but not to age, gender, tumor size, or site (Table 1). OSCCpatients with high
circ-MMP9 had a shorter overall survival time than those with low circ-MMP9 (Figure 1(c)). To test the diagnostic
utility of circ-MMP9 in OSCC, we collected plasma samples from 16 healthy control and 25
OSCCpatients to perform qRT-PCR. Consistently, circ-MMP9 was notably increased in OSCC
plasma compared with healthy controls (Figure 1(d)), and the area under curve value was 0.91 (95% confidence interval:
0.8216–0.9984) (Figure 1(e)),
suggesting that plasma circ-MMP9 has high efficacy to distinguish between OSCCpatients
and healthy control. We then selected UM1 and HSC-3 cells to establish stable circ-MMP9
knockdown cell lines. As shown in Figure
1(f) and (g), depletion of circ-MMP9 dramatically reduced MMP9 mRNA as well as
protein expression. In addition, high MMP9 expression was also observed in OSCC tissues as
compared with paracancerous tissue (Figure 1(h)). Spearman’s correlation coefficient result showed there was a
strong positive correlation between circ-MMP9 and MMP9 expression in OSCC tissues
(r=0.719, p<0.001) (Figure 1(i)). Altogether, these data indicate that
circ-MMP9 is an effective prognostic and prognostic biomarker for OSCCpatients, and it
regulates the expression of its host gene.
Fig 1.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) is upregulated in oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) and positively correlated with MMP9 expression. (a) Quantitative
real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for the expression of the indicated three circRNAs in
OSCC and matched normal tissues. (b) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 expression in OSCC
cell lines. (c) The survival curve of OSCC patients based on the median circ-MMP9
expression value. (d) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 expression in plasma samples. (e)
Receiver operating characteristic curve of OSCC patients based on plasma circ-MMP9
expression. (f) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 and MMP9 expression in
circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (g) Western blot analysis for MMP9 protein
expression circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (h) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9
expression in 74 pairs of OSCC and normal tissues. (i) The correlation between
circ-MMP9 and MMP9 expression in OSCC tissues. *p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Table 1.
Association of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) expression with
clinical parameters in 74 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Parameters
Total (n=74)
circ-MMP9 expression
p value
Low (n=37)
High (n=37)
Age (years)
≤ 60
21
11
10
0.797
> 60
53
26
27
Sex
Male
36
15
21
0.163
Female
38
22
16
Tumor site
Tongue
58
28
30
0.311
Cheek
6
2
4
Mouth floor
10
7
3
T classification
T1–T2
39
22
17
0.244
T3–T4
35
15
20
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
41
27
14
0.002
Positive
33
10
23
TNM stage
I–II
38
25
13
0.005
III–IV
36
12
24
circ-MMP9: circular matrix metalloproteinase 9.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) is upregulated in oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) and positively correlated with MMP9 expression. (a) Quantitative
real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for the expression of the indicated three circRNAs in
OSCC and matched normal tissues. (b) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 expression in OSCC
cell lines. (c) The survival curve of OSCCpatients based on the median circ-MMP9
expression value. (d) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 expression in plasma samples. (e)
Receiver operating characteristic curve of OSCCpatients based on plasma circ-MMP9
expression. (f) qRT-PCR analysis for circ-MMP9 and MMP9 expression in
circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (g) Western blot analysis for MMP9 protein
expression circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (h) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9
expression in 74 pairs of OSCC and normal tissues. (i) The correlation between
circ-MMP9 and MMP9 expression in OSCC tissues. *p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.Association of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) expression with
clinical parameters in 74 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).circ-MMP9: circular matrix metalloproteinase 9.
Knockdown of Circ-MMP9 Inhibits OSCC Cell Migration and Invasion Both in vitro and in
vivo
Next, we explored the biological function of circ-MMP9 in OSCC. The wound healing assay
showed the migration distance of UM1 and HSC-3 cells was significantly shortened after
knockdown of circ-MMP9 (Figure
2(a)). Likewise, the number of circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells crossing
the Matrigel was less than that of control cells (Figure 2(b)). Further, we established a lung
metastasis model via tail-vein injection of UM1 cells into nude mice (Figure 2(c)). The results showed that an average of
23 lung metastatic nodules were observed in the control group, whereas only five were
observed in circ-MMP9-depleted groups (Figure 2(d)). Overall, these in vitro and in vivo results suggest that circ-MMP9
is a pro-metastasis circRNA in OSCC.
Fig 2.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) depletion inhibits oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) cell migration and invasion in vitro as well as lung metastasis in
vivo. (a) Wound healing assay in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (b) Transwell
invasion assay in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (c) A schematic diagram
showing the specific process of establishing a lung metastasis model. (d)
Representative images showing lung metastasis in vivo monitored by the IVIS system
(left), lung tissues, and hematoxylin and eosin staining (middle) in the indicated
three groups. The bold T denotes tumor. **p < 0.01,
***p < 0.001.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) depletion inhibits oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) cell migration and invasion in vitro as well as lung metastasis in
vivo. (a) Wound healing assay in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (b) Transwell
invasion assay in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (c) A schematic diagram
showing the specific process of establishing a lung metastasis model. (d)
Representative images showing lung metastasis in vivo monitored by the IVIS system
(left), lung tissues, and hematoxylin and eosin staining (middle) in the indicated
three groups. The bold T denotes tumor. **p < 0.01,
***p < 0.001.
Circ-MMP9 Directly Binds to AUF1 in OSCC
To test how circ-MMP9 affects MMP mRNA expression level, we first analyzed the promoter
activity of MMP9. As shown in Figure
3(a), knockdown of circ-MMP9 had no effect on MMP9 promoter activity, implying
that circ-MMP9 regulates MMP9 expression at a post-transcriptional level. We then treated
UM1 and HSC-3 cells with Actinomycin D (a transcriptional inhibitor) to assess MMP9 mRNA
stability. The results showed that circ-MMP9 depletion shortened the half-life of MMP9
mRNA by about 2 hours (Figure
3(b)). Given that AUF1 is a key regulator of mRNA stability[13] and the sequence alignment result showed there was an AUF1 binding motif
((A/U)UUU(A/U)) on MMP9 mRNA 3′-UTR (Figure 3(c)), we thus reasoned that AUF1 may be involved in the regulation of
circ-MMP9 on MMP9. As expected, silencing AUF1 could significantly rescue the decreased
MMP9 mRNA expression caused by circ-MMP9 depletion (Figure 3(d)). Through analyzing the RPISeq online
tool, we found that circ-MMP9 probably interacted with AUF1 (RF classifier=0.88, SVM
classifier=0.91) (Figure 3(e)).
This prediction was confirmed by the RNA pull-down assay, circ-MMP9 probe could abundantly
enrich AUF1 protein, and the enrichment effect was weakened after circ-MMP9 knockdown
(Figure 3(f)). A similar result
was observed in RIPA using anti-AUF1 antibody (Figure 3(g)). However, circ-MMP9 knockdown did not
affect AUF1 expression (data not shown). Importantly, depletion of circ-MMP9 remarkably
increased the interaction between AUF1 and MMP9 3′-UTR (Figure 3(h)). Taken together, these findings
demonstrate that circ-MMP9 enhances MMP9 mRNA stability via antagonizing AUF1-induced MMP9
mRNA decay in OSCC.
Fig 3.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) stabilizes MMP9 messenger RNA (mRNA)
via interaction with AUF1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells. (a) Luciferase
reporter assay analysis for MMP9 promoter activity in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3
cells. (b) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for MMP9 expression at the
indicated time in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells treated with Actinomycin D.
(c) The sequence marked in red denotes AUF1 binding motif on MMP9 3′-untranslated
region (UTR). (d) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and
HSC-3 cells after transfection with si-AUF1. (e) The interaction probability between
circ-MMP9 and AUF1 was predicted using RPISeq online tool, RF, and SVM classifier
values > 0.5 were considered ‘positive’. (f) RNA pull-down assay using
biotin-labeled circ-MMP9 probe in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed by Western blot
analysis for AUF1 expression. (g, h) Radioimmunoprecipitation assay using anti-AUF1
antibody in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed by qRT-PCR analysis for the enrichment of
circ-MMP9 and MMP9 3′-UTR. *p < 0.05.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) stabilizes MMP9 messenger RNA (mRNA)
via interaction with AUF1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells. (a) Luciferase
reporter assay analysis for MMP9 promoter activity in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3
cells. (b) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis for MMP9 expression at the
indicated time in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells treated with Actinomycin D.
(c) The sequence marked in red denotes AUF1 binding motif on MMP9 3′-untranslated
region (UTR). (d) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and
HSC-3 cells after transfection with si-AUF1. (e) The interaction probability between
circ-MMP9 and AUF1 was predicted using RPISeq online tool, RF, and SVM classifier
values > 0.5 were considered ‘positive’. (f) RNA pull-down assay using
biotin-labeled circ-MMP9 probe in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed by Western blot
analysis for AUF1 expression. (g, h) Radioimmunoprecipitation assay using anti-AUF1
antibody in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed by qRT-PCR analysis for the enrichment of
circ-MMP9 and MMP9 3′-UTR. *p < 0.05.
Circ-MMP9 Acts as a Sponge for miR-149 in OSCC
As mentioned above, AUF1 silencing could only partially rescue the reduced MMP9 mRNA
caused by circ-MMP9 knockdown (Figure
3(d)), suggesting there are other factors mediating the regulation of circ-MMP9
on MMP9. We then determined the subcellular localization of circ-MMP9—the qRT-PCR and FISH
results showed that circ-MMP9 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm (Figure 4(a) and (b)), which is consistent with its
post-transcriptional regulation of MMP9. Numerous studies have reported that cytoplasmic
circRNA can sponge microRNA (miRNA) to regulate gene expression[14], we thus searched for miRNAs with both circ-MMP9 and MMP9 binding sites using
CircInteractome and miRanda databases, and the results showed that only miR-183 and
miR-149 met this criterion (Figure
4(c)). As shown in Figure
4(d), circ-MMP9 depletion evidently upregulated the expression of miR-149, but
not miR-183. Similarly, RNA pull-down results displayed that miR-149 rather than miR-138
was abundantly enriched by circ-MMP9 probe (Figure 4(e)). And miR-149 overexpression
significantly reduced the luciferase activity of wild-type circ-MMP9 reporter, although it
did not affect that of mutant reporter (Figure 4(f)). These results indicate that circ-MMP9 can sponge miR-149 in OSCC
cells. Next, we tested whether miR-149 could target MMP9. The sequence alignment result
showed the binding site of miR-149 on MMP9 3′-UTR did not overlap with AUF1 (Figure 4(g)). The luciferase activity
of wild-type MMP9 3′-UTR reporter rather than the mutated one was dramatically decreased
after miR-149 overexpression (Figure
4(h)). And MMP9 mRNA expression was significantly downregulated in
miR-149-overexpressing UM1 and HSC-3 cells (Figure 4(i)). Importantly, the decreased MMP9 mRNA
and the attenuated migratory and invasive abilities caused by circ-MMP9 depletion were
partly blocked by miR-149 silencing, and were totally abolished by MMP9 overexpression or
miR-149 silencing combined with AUF1 knockdown (Figure 4(j) and (k)). Collectively, these data
suggest circ-MMP9 promotes OSCCmetastasis through regulating its parental gene stability
via miR-149 and AUF1 (Figure
5).
Fig 4.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) sponges miR-149 in oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) cells. (a, b) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for the determination of cell sublocalization of
circ-MMP9. Respectively, 18 s and U6 represented the internal references of
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, and nucleus was stained by
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. (c) microRNAs (miRNAs) with both circ-MMP9 and MMP9
binding sites predicted by CircInteractome and miRanda databases. (d) qRT-PCR analysis
for miR-183 and miR-149 expression in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (e) RNA
pull-down assay using biotin-labeled circ-MMP9 probe in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed
by qRT-PCR analysis for miR-183 and miR-149 expression. (f) Luciferase reporter assay
in UM1 and HSC-3 cells co-transfected with control or miR-149 mimics and wild-type or
mutant circ-MMP9 reporter. (g) The sequence marked in red denotes miR-149 binding
motif on MMP9 3′-untranslated region (UTR). (h) Luciferase reporter assay in UM1 and
HSC-3 cells co-transfected with control or miR-149 mimics and wild-type or mutant MMP9
3′-UTR reporter. (i) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression in UM1 and HSC-3 cells
transfected with control or miR-149 mimics. (j) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression
in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells transfected with miR-149 inhibitors, miR-149
inhibitors+si-USF1, or MMP9 expression vector. (k) The assessment of migratory and
invasive abilities of circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells transfected with miR-149
inhibitors, miR-149 inhibitors+si-USF1, or MMP9 expression vector. *p
< 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig 5.
The proposed model of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) in promoting
oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) metastasis through interacting with miR-149 and
AUF1 and enhancing MMP9 messenger RNA (mRNA) stability.
Circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) sponges miR-149 in oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC) cells. (a, b) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for the determination of cell sublocalization of
circ-MMP9. Respectively, 18 s and U6 represented the internal references of
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, and nucleus was stained by
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. (c) microRNAs (miRNAs) with both circ-MMP9 and MMP9
binding sites predicted by CircInteractome and miRanda databases. (d) qRT-PCR analysis
for miR-183 and miR-149 expression in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells. (e) RNA
pull-down assay using biotin-labeled circ-MMP9 probe in UM1 and HSC-3 cells, followed
by qRT-PCR analysis for miR-183 and miR-149 expression. (f) Luciferase reporter assay
in UM1 and HSC-3 cells co-transfected with control or miR-149 mimics and wild-type or
mutant circ-MMP9 reporter. (g) The sequence marked in red denotes miR-149 binding
motif on MMP9 3′-untranslated region (UTR). (h) Luciferase reporter assay in UM1 and
HSC-3 cells co-transfected with control or miR-149 mimics and wild-type or mutant MMP9
3′-UTR reporter. (i) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression in UM1 and HSC-3 cells
transfected with control or miR-149 mimics. (j) qRT-PCR analysis for MMP9 expression
in circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells transfected with miR-149 inhibitors, miR-149
inhibitors+si-USF1, or MMP9 expression vector. (k) The assessment of migratory and
invasive abilities of circ-MMP9-depleted UM1 and HSC-3 cells transfected with miR-149
inhibitors, miR-149 inhibitors+si-USF1, or MMP9 expression vector. *p
< 0.05, **p < 0.01.The proposed model of circular matrix metalloproteinase 9 (circ-MMP9) in promoting
oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) metastasis through interacting with miR-149 and
AUF1 and enhancing MMP9 messenger RNA (mRNA) stability.
Discussion
Cancermetastasis is responsible for 90% of cancer-related deaths. Understanding the
mechanism of metastasis is essential for identifying novel therapeutic targets. In the
current study, we identified an OSCCmetastasis-associated circRNA, referred to as
circ-MMP9, which was markedly upregulated in OSCC tissues, plasma, and cell lines and
closely correlated with poor outcome. Stepwise investigations revealed that circ-MMP9 could
physically bind to AUF1 and miR-149 to protect MMP9 mRNA from degradation, leading to
increasing MMP9 expression and facilitating OSCC invasion and metastasis. More importantly,
knockdown of circ-MMP9 significantly suppressed the metastatic capability of OSCC cells in
animal models, implying that therapeutic targeting of circ-MMP9 may be a promising treatment
intervention for patients with metastatic OSCC.As a class of endogenous non-coding RNA, circRNA has attracted great attention due to its
unique loop structure and high stability and conservativeness. A large number of studies
have shown that circRNA is aberrantly expressed in humancancers and plays a crucial role in
cancer occurrence and development[15]. CircRNA functions through a variety of mechanisms, most notably as a molecular
sponge for miRNAs, in which it abundantly absorbs miRNAs to alleviate inhibition of miRNAs
on their target genes[16]. For example, circ-HIPK3[17], circ-ZEB1.33[18], circ-100146[19], and circ-ANKS1B[20] could effectively sponge miR-7, miR-200a-3p, miR-615-5p, miR-148/152, and miR-646 in
colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and breast
cancer, respectively. Herein, we found that circ-MMP9 was able to interact with miR-149 to
elevate MMP9 expression in OSCC. Intriguingly, a recent study also identified circ-MMP9 as
an oncogene that contributed to glioblastoma multiforme cell tumorigenesis via sponging miR-124[21]. However, our results showed that circ-MMP9 did not bind to miR-124 in OSCC (data not
shown), although this discrepancy can be explained by the tissue and developmental-stage
specific biological role of circRNA[22].Another important mechanism by which circRNA functions is interaction with proteins. For
instance, circ-Amotl1 was reported to directly bind to oncogene c-Myc to induce c-Myc
nuclear translocation, thereby promoting tumorigenesis[23]. Circ-UBR5 could concurrently interact with QKI, NOVA1, and U1 small nuclear RNA in
the nucleus to participate in the non-small cell lung cancer differentiation process[24]. Circ-Sirt1 was capable of inactivating NF-κB signaling via interacting with p65 and
blocking p65 nuclear translocation[25]. In the present study, we found that circ-MMP9 could physically bind to AUF1 to
increase MMP9 mRNA stability. AUF1 is a well-known mRNA destabilizer that targets the
‘(A/U)UUU(A/U)’ motif on gene mRNA 3′-UTR[26]. Of note, the binding sites of AUF1 and miR-149 on MMP9 mRNA 3′-UTR did not overlap,
suggesting they independently function to degrade MMP9 mRNA. A recent study proposed that
circ-DNMT1 could also interact with AUF1 to reduce DNMT1 mRNA decay, resulting in
facilitated breast cancer progression[27], and our data showed that depletion of circ-MMP9 enhanced the interaction between
AUF1 and MMP9 mRNA; these findings indicate that circRNA plays a pivotal role in AUF1
regulation of mRNA stability.In summary, our study clearly demonstrates that circ-MMP9 is a positive regulator of OSCCmetastasis, and highlights its important role in controlling the stability of MMP9 mRNA via
AUF1 and miR-149, supporting the pursuit of circ-MMP9 as a potential treatment intervention
for metastatic OSCCpatients.
Authors: Qi Yang; William W Du; Nan Wu; Weining Yang; Faryal Mehwish Awan; Ling Fang; Jian Ma; Xiangmin Li; Yan Zeng; Zhenguo Yang; Jun Dong; Azam Khorshidi; Burton B Yang Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: P Bossi; R Miceli; L D Locati; D Ferrari; S Vecchio; G Moretti; N Denaro; F Caponigro; M Airoldi; C Moro; E Vaccher; A Sponghini; A Caldara; G Rinaldi; F Ferrau; F Nolè; S Lo Vullo; F Tettamanzi; L Hollander; L Licitra Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Nan Wu; Zhidong Yuan; Kevin Y Du; Ling Fang; Juanjuan Lyu; Chao Zhang; Alina He; Esra Eshaghi; Kaixuan Zeng; Jian Ma; William W Du; Burton B Yang Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 15.828