Literature DB >> 32566619

FOXP3 promotes colorectal carcinoma liver metastases by evaluating MMP9 expression via regulating S-adenosylmethionine metabolism.

Zhe Wang1, Jingdong Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence has proved that Forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3), which is a master regulatory gene in the development and function of regulatory T-cells, is expressed in human cancer cells. This expression indicates the crucial role FOXP3 takes up as the disease progresses. However, its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis is still mostly unknown. This study set out to explore the molecular characteristics of FOXP3 in driving the liver metastasis within CRC.
METHODS: We downloaded the RNA-seq data from the GSE50760. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)WGCNA and RNA-Seq analysis were applied to find the key gene network associated with colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Then we performed pathway enrichment analysis on liver metastasis-associated gene set. Immunohistochemistry, in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to test expression and function of FOXP3 in CRC tissues and liver metastasis tissues. Non-targeted metabolomics analysis was performed to identify the alteration of FOXP3 expression in metabolites of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Western blot was performed to confirm changes of matrix metalloproteinase 9MMP9 expression were downstream events of S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM).
RESULTS: We found that FOXP3 and MMP9 exhibited co-expression relationships and affected liver metastasis in CRC. Upregulation of FOXP3 promotes cell migration and invasion in CRC, which suggests a pro-cancer effect. Moreover, metabolomics analysis showed that knockdown of FOXP3 significantly reduced SAM levels, and changes of MMP9 expression were downstream events of SAM, which is concentration-dependent. Besides, The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Western blot analysis confirmed that overexpression of FOXP3 activates the Wnt pathway to promote colon cancer metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results altogether suggested that FOXP3 expression inhibited the SAM cycle to reduce SAMe levels, resulting in altered MMP9 expression and helped CRC liver metastasis. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal carcinoma (CRC); FOXP3; MMP9; liver metastasis; metabolomics; transcriptome

Year:  2020        PMID: 32566619      PMCID: PMC7290543          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be one of the major causes of death from cancer. CRC ranks third among males as the most prevalent cancer, and second among females in the world (1,2). Survival rates for CRC can vary according to a variety of factors, especially the clinical stage. CRC patients’ 5-year survival rate is significantly reduced, followed by an increase in Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging levels. For example, the 5-year survival rate of patients with localized cancer (stage I) is about 95%, while the 5-year survival rate is about 13% with distant metastasis (stage IV). In CRC, liver is the most common site for distant metastasis. At diagnosis, 25 percent of CRC patients are confirmed to be present with liver metastases (2). The exact mechanism of the CRC liver metastases, however, is still uncertain. To produce successful therapies, therefore, it is important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms and genetic alterations. FOXP3 is a member of a group of evolutionarily conserved transcriptional regulators (forkhead box proteins) distinguished by a winged-helix DNA-binding domain (3). FOXP3 plays a critical role in the transfer of immune tolerance and the development of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment for master regulating the growth and function of regulatory T-cells, notably the CD4+CD25+ subset derived from the thymus (natural Tregs) (4). An accumulating amount of data has shown that FOXP3 is disrupted in cancer cells. Research has been carried out into the expression of FOXP3 in a variety of human cancer cells (5-8). The majority of studies have indicated that when FOXP3 is expressed, growth benefit is conferred to cancer cells, which correlates with unfavorable prognosis. However, some other reports have suggested the opposite (9,10). In CRC, Kim et al. suggested a poor prognosis has been associated with a higher level of FOXP3 in colon cancer cells (11). Sun et al. came to the opposite conclusion, in that FOXP3’s high expression was related to a longer overall and disease-free survival rate. The positive rate of expression was significantly associated with the degree of differentiation, depth of infiltration, metastasis of the lymph nodes and staging of pTNM (12). Nonetheless, contradictory events of FOXP3 expression in CRC and the molecular mechanism of regulation of the FOXP3-mediated gene were not fully characterized. Metabolism dysregulation is a hallmark in cancer cells, being the totality of reactions that produce energy for supporting the cancer cells alive. The essential amino acid methionine is an emergent feature of the cancer metabolism. Methionine is an essential amino acid containing sulfur which, as part of the methionine process, sequentially undergoes catabolism and recycling. In the methionine cycle methionine is transformed into S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM), the fundamental methyl donor. SAM treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) induced with different carcinogens and hepatocarcinogenesis protocols in rats can actively prevent tumors from developing (13). Furthermore, forced evaluation of SAM in human HCC cells was demonstrated to exhibit a suppressive effect in vivo tumorigenicity in mice (14). These findings show that SAM has a tumor prevention effect. However, the mechanisms of SAM responsible for the effects of cancer metastases still need to be discussed. Here, by using clinical correlation, conducting cell- and xenograft-based investigations, and analyzing transcriptomes and metabolomics, we explored FOXP3 activity in CRC liver metastases. We showed the effect of FOXP3 on the prognosis of CRC, elevated FOXP3 expression associated with poor survival in CRC. Overexpression of FOXP3 facilitated MMP9 expression through the SAM cycle to modulate CRC liver metastasis. We present the following article in accordance with the ARRIVE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3287).

Methods

Patients and variables

We retrospectively searched for fresh frozen tissues of CRC patients with liver metastasis collected from Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute. All the patients were diagnosed with primary CRC with synchronous liver metastasis or heterochrony liver metastasis. A precise pathological diagnosis was needed for both primary and metastatic lesions. Simultaneously, data were gathered from the patients’ recorded general clinical and comprehensive pathology information. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the the study protocol received approval from the ethics committee of the Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (Approval No.: 20181225).

TCGA cohort and GEO cohort

RNA-seq data of CRC was downloaded from GSE50760. A total of 54 samples were collected, including CRC tissues, adjacent non-tumorous colorectal tissues, and liver metastasis tissues. The expression profiles of 19,067 coding genes were then measured. The data were preprocessed as follows: the FPKM data was downloaded, and the mean value was chosen to be the initial expression value of the gene for multiple transcripts of the same gene. Pathway enrichment analysis was then carried out through the DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) online platform (15). Afterward, weighted co-expression networks were constructed, facilitated by the blockwiseModules function in the WGCNA package (https://labs.genetics.ucla.edu/horvath/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/WGCNA/Tutorials/) on the R platform (https://www.r-project.org/). TCGA-COAD and TCGA-READ transcriptome cohort data were available from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics website (http://www.cbioportal.org/) (16).

Cell lines and cultures

Human colorectal carcinoma RKO cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, GenDEPOT) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GenDEPOT) in a CO2 incubator at 5% humidity. Human embryonic kidney epithelial cell line 293T was bought from Invitrogen and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells in the exponential growth phase were used for the assays.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and evaluation

Immunostaining of FOXP3 was carried out with rabbit monoclonal anti-FOXP3 antibody (1:3,000, Cat. ab214, Abcam, USA). Two experienced pathologists independently assessed the staining of a specific protein in one FFPE slide. Staining intensity was scored as follows: 0: no staining; 1: weak; 2: medium; and 3: strong staining. Staining extent was graded from 0 to 4, according to the coverage percentage of immunoreactive tumor cells (0%, 1–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 76–100%). The scores of staining intensity and extent were multiplied, and the total IHC score (on a scale of 0 to 12) was calculated. A score of 0 to 3 signified negative staining and a score of 4 to 12 signified positive staining.

Cell invasion assay

Cell invasion was determined by Transwell assay was conducted to determine the cell invasion. The transfected cells were collected and resuspended in serum-free DMEM medium and cultured on the Matrigel-coated upper surface chamber. FBS medium was put in the lower chamber. A cotton swab was used to remove the remaining cells on the upper membrane surface after 24 h incubation. Next, 4% paraformaldehyde was used to fix the cells adhered to the surface of the lower membrane, and 0.1 per cent crystal violet was used for staining. Then, an optical microscope was used to count the cells.

Quantitative real-time PCR

SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara, Dalian, China) on Quantstudio™ 12 k Flex Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used to detect relevant genes. The primer sequences are included in .
Table S1

Primer sequence used for RT-PCR

GenePrimer sensePrimer anti-sense
GAPDH 5'-TTGTGGAAGGGCTCATGACC-3'5'-TCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGATG-3'
FOXP3 5'-GAGAAGCTGAGTGCCATGCA-3'5'-GGTCAGTGCCATTTTCCCAG-3'
MMP-9 5'-AAAACCTCCAACCTCACGGA-3'5'-GCGGT-ACAAGTATGCCTCTGC-3'
C-MYC 5'-TTTGTCTATTTGGGGACAGTGTT-3'5'-CATCGTCGTGGCTGTCTG-3'
Cyclin D1 5'-GCGGAGGAGAACAAACAGAT-3'5'-GAGGGCGGATTGGAAATGA-3'

Western blot

The anti-N-Cadherin (Cell signaling, 1:2,000), anti-E-Cadherin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:2,000), anti-Vimentin (Abcam, 1:1,000), anti-Snail (Cell signaling, 1:2,000), anti-MMP9 (Cell signaling, 1:2,000), anti-GADPH (Santa Cruz, 1:3,000), anti-c-Myc (Santa Cruz, 1:1,000), and anti-Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz, 1:1,000), antiFOXP3 (Abcam 1:3,000, Cell signaling 1:2,000) served as the primary antibodies. A 1:3,000–5,000 dilution of the HRP-linked anti-IgG (Santa Cruz) was used as the secondary antibody.

Construction of gene co-expression network between DEGs and DELs

A scale-free co-expression network for the hub DEGs and DELs was constructed with the WGCNA R package. Gene expression similarity matrix was formed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient between two genes, which was then transformed into adjacency matrix (a threshold power of β=5), and subsequently into a topological matrix. The extent of the relationship between genes/lncRNAs was determined by topological overlap measure (TOM). The overall level of gene expression within the module was indicated through the calculation of module eigengene (ME) to define the first principal component for a module. The key module can be found by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients between ME in each module and sample traits. Hub genes which met the criteria of having a module membership (MM) value of more than 0.9 were chosen.

SAM detection

The Bridge-It® S-Adenosyl Methionine (SAM) Fluorescence Assay Kit was used to assess the SAMe levels in line with the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells that stably expressed scrambled shRNA or FOXP3-shRNA were used to transiently express empty vector or FOXP3-overexpressing plasmid.

DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibition experiment

DNMT inhibitor, SGI-1027, was employed to inhibit DNMT activity. At 24 or 48 h after transfection, 2 µM of this compound was supplemented in culture medium for 24 h. Protein extraction and total RNA isolation were then conducted.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test) was used to analyze categorical variables. Two-sided t-test was used to compare continuous variables, and ANOVA analysis was used for multiple sets of continuous variables. Correlation between continuous variables was summarized using Spearman’s rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.3. Statistical significance was represented by P<0.05.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of the cohorts

A total of 29 CRC and liver metastasis samples with FOXP3 expression data across patient characteristics were analyzed in this study. Patients with elevated FOXP3 expression in CRC tissue were significantly correlated with T stage (P=0.02) and synchronous liver metastasis (P=0.042) (). Chi-square test revealed that patients with high FOXP3 expression are prone to progress to a more advanced stage and synchronous liver metastasis than those with low FOXP3 expression.
Table 1

FOXP3 expression associated with clinical-pathological characteristics

CharacteristicsNo. of casesPercent %P value
Age (years)0.831
   ≥601862.07
   <601137.93
Gender0.877
   Male2379.31
   Female620.69
Grade0.051
   G1620.69
   G2
   G32379.31
Diameter (cm)0.179
   ≥5517.24
   <52482.76
T stage0.02
   T1–2724.14
   T31137.93
   T41137.93
Liver metastasis0.042
   Heterochrony liver metastasis2275.86
   Synchronous liver metastasis724.14

FOXP3 is highly expressed in CRC and associated with worse clinical outcome

To establish if FOXP3 is expressed in CRC, and to explore if it has any correlation with patient outcome, we carried out immunohistochemistry (IHC) on CRC and colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) tissues. FOXP3 immunostaining was seen in CRC and CRCLM cells (). FOXP3 expression showed diffuse staining in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Statistically, in comparison with normal adjacent tissues, elevated FOXP3 was significantly expressed in cancerous tissues and metastatic liver tissues (P<0.001). DEGs analysis was performed in TCGA-COAD and TCGA-READ to confirm this finding. gives the verification results that FOXP3 is highly expressed in cancer than normal adjacent tissues in the TCGA cohort (P<0.05).
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining of FOXP3. (A,B) Immunohistochemical staining of FOXP3 in colorectal normal adjacent tissues, magnification 100×. (C) Magnification 400×. (D,E) Primary cancer tissues, magnification 100×. (F) Magnification 400×. (G,H) Liver metastatic tissues, magnification 100×. (I) Magnification 400×.

Figure 2

FOXP3 is upregulated in colorectal carcinoma patients. (A) GEPIA expression analysis of FOXP3 in human colon carcinoma patients. Orange box: 275 colon carcinoma patients; blue box: 349 healthy donors. (B) GEPIA expression analysis of FOXP3 in human rectal carcinoma patients. Orange box: 92 rectal carcinoma patients; blue box: 318 healthy donors. *, P<0.05.

Immunohistochemical staining of FOXP3. (A,B) Immunohistochemical staining of FOXP3 in colorectal normal adjacent tissues, magnification 100×. (C) Magnification 400×. (D,E) Primary cancer tissues, magnification 100×. (F) Magnification 400×. (G,H) Liver metastatic tissues, magnification 100×. (I) Magnification 400×. FOXP3 is upregulated in colorectal carcinoma patients. (A) GEPIA expression analysis of FOXP3 in human colon carcinoma patients. Orange box: 275 colon carcinoma patients; blue box: 349 healthy donors. (B) GEPIA expression analysis of FOXP3 in human rectal carcinoma patients. Orange box: 92 rectal carcinoma patients; blue box: 318 healthy donors. *, P<0.05.

Ectopic expression of FOXP3 facilitates proliferation and migration of CRC cells in vitro and in vivo

To measure the role of ectopic expression of FOXP3 on cancer cells, FOXP3 lentivirus was transfected into CRC cell lines (RKO and HT-29), and Western blot was carried out to validate FOXP3 expression (). We found that overexpression of FOXP3 promotes cell growth in vitro (). Besides, elevated expression of FOXP3 significantly increases cell viability in the invasion and migration of RKO cells ().
Figure 3

Functional properties of the FOXP3 in vitro. (A) FOXP3 lentivirus was transfected or knocked out CRC cell lines, and FOXP3 expression was assessed by Western blot; (B) the subcutaneous tumor cell growth curve of overexpression FOXP3 and shFOXP3 was compared with the control cells. Enhanced tumor growth was exhibited in the OE-FOXP3 group in comparison with the control group (P<0.05); (C,D) FOXP3 knockdown inhibited CRC cell’s invasive capability as compared to the effect of the negative control, magnification 100×; (E,F) FOXP3 knockdown inhibited CRC cell migration capability as compared to the effect of the negative control, magnification 100×. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. All data are the mean ± SD. CRC, colorectal cancer.

Functional properties of the FOXP3 in vitro. (A) FOXP3 lentivirus was transfected or knocked out CRC cell lines, and FOXP3 expression was assessed by Western blot; (B) the subcutaneous tumor cell growth curve of overexpression FOXP3 and shFOXP3 was compared with the control cells. Enhanced tumor growth was exhibited in the OE-FOXP3 group in comparison with the control group (P<0.05); (C,D) FOXP3 knockdown inhibited CRC cell’s invasive capability as compared to the effect of the negative control, magnification 100×; (E,F) FOXP3 knockdown inhibited CRC cell migration capability as compared to the effect of the negative control, magnification 100×. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. All data are the mean ± SD. CRC, colorectal cancer. Because cell growth is promoted by FOXP3 in vitro, we next the contribution of FOXP3 in CRC cell growth in vivo. After 18 days of inoculation, the average tumor volume in the overexpression FOXP3-infected group was observed to be 2.6-fold more extensive than that of control group. The tumors of the RKO-FOXP3 and RKO-Control groups of nude mice are shown in . Overall, these results illustrated that FOXP3 performs distinct oncogene functions in CRC.
Figure 4

Tumor samples after stable transplantation of different groups of colon carcinoma cells in nude mice. (A) Images of the different tumor samples following stable of different groups of cells; (B) tumor size after stable transplantation in nude mice.

Tumor samples after stable transplantation of different groups of colon carcinoma cells in nude mice. (A) Images of the different tumor samples following stable of different groups of cells; (B) tumor size after stable transplantation in nude mice.

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis of differential genes

Since FOXP3 displays metastasis-related properties, including cell proliferation and migration in CRC, we intended to find a series of combined action genes that promote liver metastasis from a whole transcriptome perspective. WGCNA was exploited to conduct closely co-expressed high-variant genes (HVGs) into co-expression gene sets. A total of 8,844 HVGs were regarded as the candidate genes and clustered by average linkage hierarchical clustering analysis by transforming adjacency matrix into TOM, and each network module was set with a minimum of 30 genes based on Dynamic Tree Cut standard (). Twelve new modules were generated from the calculated eigengenes of each module (). The genes unable to be clustered into other modules were clustered into the gray modules.
Figure 5

WGCNA network and module detection. (A) Selection of the soft-thresholding powers. The left panel shows the scale-free fit index versus the soft-thresholding power; (B) the right panel displays the mean connectivity versus the soft-thresholding power. Power 7 was chosen because the fit index curve flattened out upon reaching a high value (>0.9); (C) cluster dendrogram and module assignment for modules from WGCNA. Genes cluster dendrogram drawn using a dissimilarity measure (1-TOM). The colored horizontal bar below the dendrogram represent the modules. A total of 8,844 genes were assigned to one of 12 modules including the gray module; (D) each column corresponds to a clinical feature (primary tissues, normal tissues, or metastatic tissues) and each row to an eigengene module. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation on the first line and the P value on the second line. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend. The gray module included all the genes that could not be clustered.

WGCNA network and module detection. (A) Selection of the soft-thresholding powers. The left panel shows the scale-free fit index versus the soft-thresholding power; (B) the right panel displays the mean connectivity versus the soft-thresholding power. Power 7 was chosen because the fit index curve flattened out upon reaching a high value (>0.9); (C) cluster dendrogram and module assignment for modules from WGCNA. Genes cluster dendrogram drawn using a dissimilarity measure (1-TOM). The colored horizontal bar below the dendrogram represent the modules. A total of 8,844 genes were assigned to one of 12 modules including the gray module; (D) each column corresponds to a clinical feature (primary tissues, normal tissues, or metastatic tissues) and each row to an eigengene module. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation on the first line and the P value on the second line. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend. The gray module included all the genes that could not be clustered. Pearson’s correlation coefficient measured the relationship between each element and the clinical traits (). Genes in yellow, black, brown, magenta, green, blue, and red modules were related to healthy tissues, while genes in green, yellow, purple, pink, and turquoise modules were related to colorectal carcinoma tissues. Meanwhile, the black module was significantly related to the liver metastasis characteristic. Genes included FOXP3 in the black modules are listed in .
Table S2

Genes included FOXP3 in the black modules

GeneModule
LILRB4 Black
RPLP0P2 Black
CCL2 Black
LPGAT1 Black
STON2 Black
C19orf57 Black
GJB3 Black
MSL3 Black
NPC1 Black
PLK3 Black
CHRNA6 Black
CXCL11 Black
TM4SF1 Black
NCF2 Black
FCGR1B Black
TACSTD2 Black
POU3F1 Black
SPRED3 Black
FCGR2B Black
STC1 Black
SLCO1B7 Black
C3AR1 Black
SERPINE1 Black
FCGR1A Black
KRT6A Black
LOC100505839 Black
SIGLEC9 Black
CLDN2 Black
STAT1 Black
ITGB2 Black
C2orf68 Black
SLA Black
RAB42 Black
CD86 Black
VSIG4 Black
LILRA6 Black
IP6K2 Black
ZNF812 Black
PRKCZ Black
LOC100287314 Black
RECQL Black
ITGAV Black
STX11 Black
CHST11 Black
ZNF365 Black
1-Mar Black
LILRB3 Black
ATPIF1 Black
ETV5 Black
MAP3K8 Black
KRT5 Black
MMP9 Black
PSAP Black
MAFB Black
DUSP4 Black
CCR1 Black
LIMS1 Black
GSDMC Black
ITGAM Black
MFI2 Black
DRAM1 Black
FRMD5 Black
TMEM219 Black
FAM98C Black
DCBLD2 Black
CACFD1 Black
ZNF697 Black
CEP170 Black
SPATC1 Black
IGFL2 Black
NR2F6 Black
SLC39A5 Black
GPR84 Black
FGR Black
PTCRA Black
LAMC2 Black
OSCAR Black
SIRPA Black
CD68 Black
CMTM7 Black
LINC00570 Black
AMPD3 Black
NLRC4 Black
CLEC7A Black
LOC100289019 Black
HAVCR2 Black
ARL4C Black
GPR137B Black
GPR97 Black
FOXC1 Black
CSF3R Black
CD84 Black
SLC11A1 Black
TM4SF19 Black
RAET1L Black
CARD6 Black
CYP27B1 Black
CCL4 Black
CD83 Black
SHD Black
SCIMP Black
APOL1 Black
ACSL4 Black
TNFSF13B Black
MRC1 Black
CRISP3 Black
ZFAND2B Black
GPNMB Black
MEPE Black
LHFPL3 Black
LIF Black
CEP170P1 Black
RXFP3 Black
ADRBK2 Black
OLR1 Black
FCGR2A Black
CXorf38 Black
APOBR Black
LEMD1 Black
RELT Black
FCGR3B Black
COBL Black
CHSY1 Black
C12orf59 Black
SIGLEC7 Black
PIK3R5 Black
SLC38A6 Black
DGAT1 Black
MSC Black
DUSP9 Black
NDUFS3 Black
SIRPB1 Black
SIRPD Black
CNPPD1 Black
CDC27 Black
LOC644242 Black
LPCAT1 Black
LOC653786 Black
COX8A Black
DFNA5 Black
TLR4 Black
LRRC25 Black
FOXP3 Black
CCL18 Black
SH3TC2 Black
MCHR1 Black
ALOX5AP Black
PPP1R3E Black
BCAT1 Black
TPRN Black
EDARADD Black
KCNJ5 Black
C19orf59 Black
SIGLEC5 Black
PILRA Black
C11orf2 Black
NLRP12 Black
EFNA2 Black
COL22A1 Black
CLEC6A Black
PSTPIP2 Black
SLC39A6 Black
F2R Black
MAZ Black
HDHD3 Black
SPHK1 Black
IFI30 Black
CD72 Black
CXCR4 Black
GM2A Black
NALCN-AS1 Black
MNDA Black
XIRP1 Black
LOC339874 Black
CCL4L1 Black
ALOX15B Black
SLC46A2 Black
CYP2R1 Black
TIMP1 Black
FCGR1C Black
PLEKHN1 Black
PI4K2A Black
CCDC115 Black
SPP1 Black
BTF3L4 Black
CCDC102B Black
RNF41 Black
ADAM9 Black
PLAUR Black
HTRA4 Black
HS3ST2 Black
CSF2RA Black
CD300C Black
C12orf70 Black
SLC13A2 Black
CD300E Black
P2RX7 Black
CD33 Black
PLA2G7 Black
RNF115 Black
ECSIT Black
NPL Black
OR7E14P Black
TNFAIP6 Black
RARB Black
YOD1 Black
C1QA Black
TLR2 Black
LOC100505702 Black
TDRD6 Black
C11orf45 Black
C12orf5 Black
MMP7 Black
C1orf162 Black
NUDT22 Black
MREG Black
SLC16A6 Black
GRIK1-AS2 Black
GJB4 Black
TNFSF18 Black
IRF5 Black
MMP15 Black
IGSF6 Black
HS2ST1 Black
GNA15 Black
GNS Black
NRD1 Black
LILRA5 Black
LRIT2 Black
SLC7A7 Black
CD163 Black
C1QC Black
KRT17 Black
KEL Black
DSE Black
CLEC5A Black
PAEP Black
CYBB Black
OSM Black
TYROBP Black
LINC00256B Black
TFEC Black
KIAA1024 Black
SPOCD1 Black
C7orf59 Black
POSTN Black
IL21R Black
HCK Black
EMR2 Black
ARID5A Black
FUT6 Black
CMAS Black
LST1 Black
SPI1 Black
B4GALT6 Black
NDUFA1 Black
KLC3 Black
CD300A Black
DOK4 Black
BTBD11 Black
EMR3 Black
CEACAM4 Black
NAA60 Black
ENTHD1 Black
SLC2A6 Black
CXCR2 Black
TREM2 Black
TNF Black
PPP1CA Black
PLA2G6 Black
SNAPC1 Black
SLC41A1 Black
LY86 Black
PITPNC1 Black
GFER Black
SPR Black
CLEC4E Black
DNAJC5B Black
THSD7B Black
LETM2 Black
GFPT2 Black
KRT7 Black
LAPTM5 Black
FCER1G Black
KLK7 Black
C1QB Black
TRIP12 Black
UQCR10 Black
ELK4 Black
HIGD2A Black
BATF Black
MYO1F Black
LYN Black
LAIR1 Black
DEFA3 Black
DCSTAMP Black
LRRC42 Black
C5orf46 Black
UBD Black
SEMA7A Black
ACTBL2 Black
PRAM1 Black
ARSH Black
GSDMA Black
IL4I1 Black
CCL26 Black
PIP5K1A Black
CD80 Black
SHOX2 Black
NABP1 Black
OAS3 Black
ADAM17 Black
PRRG1 Black
ANXA3 Black
HK3 Black
LILRA2 Black
CAND1 Black
ITGAX Black
MMD Black
ASTE1 Black
ANO4 Black
FPR3 Black
SLAMF8 Black
ADAM19 Black
CYP1B1 Black
FCGR3A Black
CCR8 Black
MORC4 Black
RASSF4 Black
ZNF768 Black
TYMP Black
SLC2A3 Black
KCNH4 Black
KRT79 Black
COX4I1 Black
MYH6 Black
EMP2 Black
C2CD4A Black
OSBPL8 Black
DNAH2 Black
SLC15A3 Black
LOC100506585 Black
CDC42SE1 Black
PICALM Black
C9orf139 Black
TMEM86A Black
TNFRSF9 Black
FASTK Black
S100A9 Black
NFAM1 Black
TREM1 Black
LINC00256A Black
ZMYND15 Black
C5AR1 Black
RXFP1 Black
FPR1 Black
CLEC12A Black
LILRB2 Black
HNRPDL Black
SLC1A3 Black
HNF1A-AS1 Black
CXCR1 Black
LILRB1 Black
MSR1 Black
FCAR Black
ACP5 Black
TRAF1 Black
We conducted a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis to reveal the general functional features of the liver metastasis-associated gene set. Notably, pathway enriches in the process of promoting tumorigenicity, including cell cycle, DNA replication, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), and chemokine signaling pathway (17,18) ().
Figure 6

KEGG pathway enrichment analyses for genes in the black module.

KEGG pathway enrichment analyses for genes in the black module.

Ectopic expression of FOXP3 activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway in CRC cells

MMP9, Cyclin D1, c-Myc were co-expressed in the black module, which was correlated with CRCLM in transcriptome analysis, and were marker genes in Wnt/β-catenin signaling (19). We further examined the expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1. Both qPCR () and Western blot () revealed the expression of c-Myc and Cylin D1 to be elevated when FOXP3 was ectopically expressed, which indicated that FOXP3 overexpression stimulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in CRC cells.
Figure 7

FOXP3 upregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells. (A) FOXP3 upregulated mRNA expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells, while silencing FOXP3 downregulated mRNA expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells; (B) over expression of FOXP3 upregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells, while silencing FOXP3 downregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells. *, P<0.05.

FOXP3 upregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells. (A) FOXP3 upregulated mRNA expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells, while silencing FOXP3 downregulated mRNA expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells; (B) over expression of FOXP3 upregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells, while silencing FOXP3 downregulated protein expression of c-Myc and Cyclin D1 in RKO cells. *, P<0.05.

FOXP3 upregulated MMP9 expression through methylthioadenosine (MTA) cycle to modulate colorectal carcinoma metastases

Metastatic colonization formation has been seen to be a significant rate-limiting step during metastatic liver growth (20). This selective pressure may be due in part to the hypoxic microenvironment as well as substantial metabolic activity (21). Therefore, we conducted metabolomics to perform the effect of FOXP3 on tumor metabolism. Many methionine-related elements of metabolism are linked to cancer. The methionine cycle sees the conversion of methionine to the universal methyl donor SAM, which is converted to S-adenosyl-homocysteine (SAH) after the donation of its methyl group. Through non-target metabolomics analysis, we found that SAM was significantly increased in the siFOXP3 group (). One role methionine plays in controlling cancer-associated phenotypes is mediating gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms. These results suggest that over the SAM cycle, FOXP3 promotes liver metastasis in CRC.
Figure 8

MMP9 expression mediated by FOXP3 is through the metabolism of SAM. (A) Metabolomics analysis showed silence of FOXP3 in colorectal cancer cells significantly increases S-adenosyl-methionine levels; (B) western blot analysis of expression of MMP9 pre-treated with or without DNMT inhibitor; (C) western blot analysis expression of MMP9 pre-treated with SAM in wrote down concentrations.

MMP9 expression mediated by FOXP3 is through the metabolism of SAM. (A) Metabolomics analysis showed silence of FOXP3 in colorectal cancer cells significantly increases S-adenosyl-methionine levels; (B) western blot analysis of expression of MMP9 pre-treated with or without DNMT inhibitor; (C) western blot analysis expression of MMP9 pre-treated with SAM in wrote down concentrations. We knocked down FOXP3 via siRNA transfection strategy to shine a light on the role of FOXP3 in the modulation of these co-expression hub genes. The level of mRNA expression of the 10 selected hub genes () was then calculated using qRT-PCR. Results showed that reduction in the expression of FOXP3 significantly reduced the expression of MMP9 more than two-fold (). The matrix metalloproteinases-9, MMP-9, is a significant protease, which is able to regulate ECM remodeling by cleaving many extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and performs a pivotal task in cancer cell invasion and tumor metastasis. To confirm the impact of FOXP3 on MMP9 expression, western blot analysis, and RT-qPCR were performed in FOXP3 stably expressing cells. The protein and mRNA levels of MMP9 were observed to be markedly increased in cells exhibiting FOXP3 overexpression, as shown in . Conversely, knockdown of FOXP3 significantly reduced MMP9 protein and mRNA expression.
Figure S1

Ten hub genes expression (A: CCL2, B: CXCR4, C: S100A9, D: CSF3R, E: TNFRSF, F: FOXC1, G: MMP9, H: CYP2R1, I: ARID5A, J: MMP7) in si-FOXP3 group and control group. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001.

Next, we analyzed whether the downregulation of MMP9 was a downstream event of the SAM cycle according to the results in . As expected, the expression of MMP9 was significantly higher under the supplementation of DNMT inhibitor in cells with FOXP3 overexpression. Also, we analyzed the MMP9 expression level following SAM treatment at various concentrations for 72 h. Accordingly, we noticed a decrease in the MMP9 protein level in a SAM dose-dependent manner. These findings altogether confirmed the hypothesis that FOXP3 negatively regulates SAM and therefore reduced MMP9 promoter methylation to induce its expression.

Discussion

The significant finding from this study is that we indicated FOXP3 acts as a potent oncogene in CRC liver metastasis. Overexpression of FOXP3 enhanced CRC cells with metastatic behavior via activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This resulted in a hyperactivation condition. which is a core characteristic of CRC development. FOXP3-mediated S-adenosylmethionine regulated MMP9 promoter demethylation, upregulating expression of MMP9, which has been widely found to relate to the invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis pathology of cancers. High FOXP3 expression was significantly associated with poor outcomes in CRC patients. Collectively, our data showed that a high level of FOXP3 expression in cancer cells plays a pivotal role in propelling CRC liver metastasis and decreasing patient survival. It paves a novel way for FOXP3 expression to be able to influence the pathogenesis of CRC liver metastasis via interference with S-adenosylmethionine metabolism. It is well known that FOXP3 is a specific marker of regulatory T cells (Tregs), and that performs a vital task in the differentiation of Tregs to mediate tumor immune escape (17,22). However, recently its expression has been shown in distinct types of human tumor cells. FOXP3 exhibited paradoxical roles in different types of tumors. Li et al. demonstrated that FOXP3 suppresses angiogenesis of breast cancer by downregulating the expression of VEGF (18). Guo et al. revealed that the expression of FOXP3 was correlated with the grade of gastric lesion, indicating that FOXP3 may have an essential function in gastric cancer formation, development and prognosis (23). Shi et al. suggested that FOXP3 has a suppressive effect on the progression of HCC tumors via the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)/Smad2/3 signaling pathway, which presents FOXP3 as a factor in the prognosis of and a novel target for the optimal treatment of HCC (24). On the contrary, Tang et al. showed that there is a positive correlation between FOXP3 and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression and lymphangiogenesis in cervical cancer (25). Mechanistically, Gao et al. found that nuclear Galectin-1 (Gal-1) interferes with the binding process between FOXP3 and DNA through its interaction with FOXP3’s FKH domain, which may the possible mechanism behind the loss of the tumor-suppressive properties of FOXP3 in wild-type FOXP3-positive breast cancer (26). In this study, data analysis of our cohort and CRC cells supported our hypothesis; the high expression of FOXP3 detected in tumor tissues from CRC patients led to the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway and decreased overall survival. KEGG analysis illustrated that prostate cancer samples were enriched with meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11), which is involved in the most significant pathways, including the mitotic spindle, ultraviolet response, and TGF-β signaling pathways. Of the Wnt signaling pathways, the established Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been investigated most extensively. In the established pathway, when there are adequate levels of β-catenin, a fraction of cytoplasmic β-catenin migrates to the nucleus to interact with the LEF-1/T-cell factor (TCF) family transcription factors. As a consequence, these transcription factors stimulate the activation of oncogenes involved in EMT, survival, angiogenesis motility, and invasion, including c-Myc, VEGF, monocyte chemo-attractant protein 1 (CCL2), snail, slug, vimentin, and metalloproteinases (27-30). To this end, FOXP3 was chosen for further study of its potent role in driving metastasis, considering its recognized role in promoting CRC cell migration and invasion. The relationship between FOXP3 and CRC liver metastasis has seldom been reported, although notably, MRE11 has been confirmed to support a reduced overall survival rate and is believed to be highly expressed in tissues from CRC tumors and liver metastasis. Metabolomics analysis of CRC cells revealed that the metastasis promotion effect by FOXP3 was mediated through the SAM cycle. Following our results, Luo et al. reported that SAM could effectively exhibit an inhibitive effect on tumor cell growth via the reversal of DNA hypomethylation on oncogene promoters, leading to the downregulation of their expression. As it has no effect on the expression of P16 and other tumor suppressor genes, SAM could potentially be applied in cancer therapy (31). This was suggested in the study of Luo et al. (31). Previous studies also found that SAM acts as a regulator of apoptosis and autophagy in MCF-7 breast cancer cells via the microRNA-specific modulation (32). On the other hand, Shi et al. reveal that SAM presents as evidence of tumor suppression, especially on primary osteosarcoma, but it lacks positive effects on metastatic osteosarcoma (33). All these studies prove that the SAM cycle plays a significant role in tumor growth and development. Further, Greenberg et al. demonstrate that plasma levels of SAM are significantly elevated in lung cancer patients and, in combination with chest CT, may serve as a helpful tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer (34). In our study, FOXP3 inhibition was shown to suppress the expression of MMP9, which was characteristic of a downstream event of the SAM cycle. It has been reported that MMP9 can be an essential driver of tumor growth and metastasis in many types of tumors. Bing Xia et al. revealed circular RNA derived from MMP9 facilitates oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through regulation of MMP9 mRNA stability (35). Similarly, Diosmetin was found to influence the inhibition of SK-HEP-1 and MHcc97H cell metastasis through the downregulation of MMP-2/9 expression via the PKC/MAPK/MMP pathways (36). Moreover, Chen et al. reported that G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein 1 can facilitate tumor progression via the activation of ERK/MMP9 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma (37). We recognized that FOXP3 affects MMP9 expression is in a SAM-dependent way. SAM can effectively inhibit the tumor cell growth via the reversal of the DNA hypomethylation on oncogene promoters, without influencing the expression of the tumor suppressor genes. These results suggest that SAM could potentially be an option for cancer treatment. At the same time, our study has limitations as follows. Firstly, this study is a retrospective small sample study. Besides, the revelation of detailed mechanism between FOXP3 and metastasis of CRC as well as specific relation of SAM and MMP9 need further experiments to confirm. In conclusion, our study reveals the relationship that increased FOXP3 expression has with liver metastasis and poor survival in CRC patients. These data indicate that FOXP3 may function as an oncogene and that it holds promise as a biomarker for CRC patients with liver metastasis. More validation cohorts and further elucidation are needed so that all of the values of FOXP3 in cancer cells and its clinical application for CRC liver metastasis can be established. Ten hub genes expression (A: CCL2, B: CXCR4, C: S100A9, D: CSF3R, E: TNFRSF, F: FOXC1, G: MMP9, H: CYP2R1, I: ARID5A, J: MMP7) in si-FOXP3 group and control group. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. The article’s supplementary files as
  37 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic mechanisms of regulation of Foxp3 expression.

Authors:  Girdhari Lal; Jonathan S Bromberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Forced expression of methionine adenosyltransferase 1A in human hepatoma cells suppresses in vivo tumorigenicity in mice.

Authors:  Jiaping Li; Komal Ramani; Zhanfeng Sun; Chishing Zee; Edward G Grant; Heping Yang; Meng Xia; Pilsoo Oh; Kwangsuk Ko; José M Mato; Shelly C Lu
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  S-adenosylmethionine inhibits the growth of cancer cells by reversing the hypomethylation status of c-myc and H-ras in human gastric cancer and colon cancer.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Yan-Ni Li; Fei Wang; Wei-Ming Zhang; Xin Geng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 6.580

4.  Correlation between FOXP3 expression and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Guoxiao Guo; Zhikuan He; Zhaohui Shi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Hinz; Laia Pagerols-Raluy; Hans-Heinrich Oberg; Ole Ammerpohl; Sandra Grüssel; Bence Sipos; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Hendrik Ungefroren; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Günter Klöppel; Dieter Kabelitz; Holger Kalthoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  GIT1 is a novel prognostic biomarker and facilitates tumor progression via activating ERK/MMP9 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Junyi Chen; Pinghua Yang; Jue Yang; Zhijian Wen; Baohua Zhang; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Foxp3 is correlated with VEGF-C expression and lymphangiogenesis in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiabu Tang; Zheng Yang; Zhuo Wang; Zhen Li; Hongmei Li; Jinbao Yin; Min Deng; Wei Zhu; Chao Zeng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Expression of Foxp3 in colorectal cancer but not in Treg cells correlates with disease progression in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mia Kim; Tanja Grimmig; Martin Grimm; Maria Lazariotou; Eva Meier; Andreas Rosenwald; Igor Tsaur; Roman Blaheta; Uwe Heemann; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Martin Gasser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  FOXP3 Is a HCC suppressor gene and Acts through regulating the TGF-β/Smad2/3 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Jie-Yi Shi; Li-Jie Ma; Ji-Wei Zhang; Meng Duan; Zhen-Bin Ding; Liu-Xiao Yang; Ya Cao; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Xiaoming Zhang; Ying-Jun Zhao; Xiao-Ying Wang; Qiang Gao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Role of FOXP3 on Tumor Metastasis and Its Interaction with Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Authors:  Benxu Ma; Wenjun Miao; Jieqiong Xiao; Xinyi Chen; Jing Xu; Yinan Li
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Interplay of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, normal colonic mucosa, cancer-associated fibroblasts, clinicopathological data and the immunoregulatory molecules of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Łukasz Zadka; Mariusz Chabowski; Damian Grybowski; Aleksandra Piotrowska; Piotr Dzięgiel
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.968

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.