Literature DB >> 31510056

Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin on Soluble FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 1/Placental Growth Factor (sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio) in Pregnancies at High Risk for the Development of Preeclampsia.

Karoline Mayer-Pickel1, Vassiliki Kolovetsiou-Kreiner2, Christina Stern3, Julia Münzker4, Katharina Eberhard5, Slave Trajanoski6, Ioana-Claudia Lakovschek7, Daniela Ulrich8, Bence Csapo9, Uwe Lang10, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch11, Mila Cervar-Zivkovic12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Soluble FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) have been reported to be highly predictive several weeks before the onset of preeclampsia.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate longitudinal changes of serum levels sFlt-1 and PlGF in pregnant women at high risk for the development of preeclampsia and to reveal an impact of aspirin on maternal serum concentrations of sFlt-1 and PlGF.
METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal study in 394 women with various risk factors for the development of preeclampsia (chronic hypertension, antiphospholipid syndrome/APS or systemic lupus erythematosus/SLE, thrombophilia, women with a history of preeclampsia, pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia) and 68 healthy women. Serum levels of sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured prospectively at 4-week intervals (from gestational weeks 12 until postpartum).
RESULTS: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in women with an adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with a normal pregnancy, starting between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation. There was no effect of aspirin on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with chronic hypertension, APS/SLE, thrombophilia and controls. The use of aspirin showed a trend towards an improvement of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy and a significant effect on the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal an impact of aspirin on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia, strongly supporting its prophylactic use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse pregnancy outcome; aspirin; first trimester screening for preeclampsia; high-risk pregnancies; preeclampsia; sFlt1/PlGF ratio

Year:  2019        PMID: 31510056      PMCID: PMC6780316          DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


1. Introduction

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific multiorgan disorder, complicating 3–5% of all pregnancies [1,2]. Despite advances in fetomaternal management, preeclampsia is still a major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in developing countries. It is a known fact that the prevalence of preeclampsia is 3–5 times higher in women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy as well as in women with chronic hypertension [3,4]. Furthermore, pregnancies in women with certain autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are complicated by preeclampsia in up to 8–35% [5,6,7,8,9,10]. An association of maternal thrombophilia and preeclampsia has been reported, although with conflicting results [11,12]. Preeclampsia is not a single disease, but rather a syndrome, affecting many organs and is characterized by endothelial dysfunction. Although the exact mechanisms are still unknown, several systemic processes have been proposed and are well accepted: Angiogenic imbalance, oxidative stress, and exaggerated systemic inflammation [13,14,15,16]. Daily administration of low-dose aspirin (LDA) has a modest beneficial effect in reducing the rate of preterm preeclampsia [17,18,19,20,21,22]. It has been demonstrated that the use of LDA from 11 to 14 weeks of gestation until 36 weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of early onset preeclampsia by approximately 60% [21]. According to several previous studies, aspirin improves implantation and placentation and has vasodilatory effects by increasing prostacyclin production. Aspirin seems to have a direct effect on platelets and might improve endothelial dysfunction [23]. The effect of aspirin on angiogenic factors, such as soluble FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) is the subject of ongoing interest and has been examined in several in vitro studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the serum levels of sFlt-1 and PlGF in women at high risk for the development of preeclampsia longitudinally during pregnancy and to determine a potential impact of LDA on the maternal serum concentrations of these angiogenic markers.

2. Patients and Methods

A total of 394 women were included in this prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with one or more of the following risk factors for the development of preeclampsia: Chronic hypertension, SLE and/or APS, maternal thrombophilia, history of preeclampsia, and a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia. Controls were women without any known predisposing risk factors for the development of preeclampsia. Exclusion criteria were fetal abnormalities, fetal loss before 23 + 0 weeks of gestation, and multiple pregnancies. Women were recruited at time of admission for prenatal care, starting between 10 and 12 weeks of gestation. Women with APS fulfilled at least one of the Sydney clinical criteria [24] and women with SLE showed at least 4 of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [25]. Apart from APS, maternal thrombophilia was defined as an inherited or acquired condition which predisposes an individual to thromboembolism, such as antithrombin deficiency, APC resistance, Factor V Leiden mutation, Factor II G202I0A, or combined effects [12]. Chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, and HELLP (hemolysis elevated liver enzymes low platelets) syndrome were defined according to international criteria [26]. IUGR (intrauterine growth restriction) was defined as fetal growth <5th percentile of gestational age. The first trimester screening for preeclampsia consisted of a combination of maternal demographic characteristics, including medical and obstetric history, uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), and placental growth factor (PlGF) at 11–13 weeks gestation [27]. Blood samples were collected without anticoagulant every 4 weeks from time of study inclusion until delivery. Samples were centrifuged at 800× g for 10 min; sera were portioned in 200 μL aliquots and stored at the Biobank Graz, Austria, at −80 °C. sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured using an automated ELISA (Roche Diagnostics GmbH; Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The detection limit was 6 pg/mL for sFlt-1 and <2 pg/mL for PlGF. The intra-assay coefficients of variation were <2% for sFlt-1 and PlGF, and the inter-assay coefficients of variation were 2.3% to 4.3% for the sFlt-1 assay and 2.7% to 4.1% for the PlGF assay. The study protocol was approved by the Medical University Ethics Committee (IRB00002556) and all participants gave written informed consent.

Statistical Analysis

After data closure, all variables passed a plausibility check to detect outliers in the data set. No extreme values have been extracted from the full data set. Assumption of normal distribution was proven with Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests (p > 0.05 normally distributed data assumed) and Q–Q plots. Comparisons among different outcome groups were tested with Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests with post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. To investigate longitudinal changes over time on different outcome variables and to deal with random effects and unequal sample sizes for the different gestational age weeks (measured for sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio) linear mixed effects models were performed. The linear mixed effects models were performed as restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach combined with the Satterthwaite’s method. The patient ID of pregnant women was considered as a person-specific random effect. In the intervals for different stages of gestational age, when more than one sample existed per woman, the latest sample was used. Data are presented as total number, as mean ± standard deviation, or in case of a skewed distribution, as median and interquartile range (25-percentile and 75-percentile). A two-tailed p-value of less than p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), R version 3.4.1 (package lmer), and GraphPad Prism version 6.05 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) for visualizations.

3. Results

The study group consisted of 89 women with chronic hypertension, 44 women with SLE and/or APS, 22 women with thrombophilia, 118 women with a history of preeclampsia, 53 women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia, and 68 controls. Maternal thrombophilia—apart from APS—consisted in most cases of APC resistance, Faktor V Leiden mutation. Overall, first trimester screening for preeclampsia has been performed in 243 women; 113 women were screened positive for either early or late onset preeclampsia. Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of women included in the study.

Chronic Hypertension (n = 89) APS/SLE (n = 44)Thrombophilia (n = 22)History of Preeclampsia (n = 118)Pathologic First Trimester Screening (n = 53)Controls (n = 68)P
Maternal age (years) 33.4 ± 5.832.4 ± 6.229.45 ± 5.932.9 ± 4.533.9 ± 4.834.1 ± 6n.s.
Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m²) 31.02 ± 7.4 23.9 ± 4.526.4 ± 6.725.5 ± 5.625.5 ± 6.526.5 ± 6.70.001
Average systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 143.8 ± 19.2132.6 ± 11.2129.8 ± 16.2135.8 ± 12.8131.2 ± 13.2128.9 ± 15.10.001
Average diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 93.1 ± 13.184.2 ± 8.285.5 ± 15.991.5 ± 12.889.5 ± 10.879.1 ± 11.70.001
Ethnicity
African, no. (%)2 (2.2%)1 (2.2%)0000
Arabian, no. (%)2 (2.2%)2 (4.5%)04 (3.4%)00
Asian, no. (%)0001 (0.8%)00
Caucasian, no. (%)85 (95.5%)41 (93.3%)22 (100%)113 (95.8%)53 (100%)68
low dose aspirin
Overall, no. (%)70 (78.6%)40 (90.9%)10 (45.5%)110 (93.2%)51 (96.2%)0
<100 mg, no. (%)18 (20.2%)4 (9.1%)1 (4.5%)13 (11%)7 (13.2%)0
100 mg, no. (%)26 (29.2%)23 (52.2%)5 (22.7%)60 (50.8%)29 (54.7%)0
150 mg, no. (%)26 (29.2%)13 (29.5%)4 (18.2%)37 (31.45)15 (12.7%)0
preeclampsia 16 (17.9%)8 (18.2%)1 (4.5%)19 (16.15)6 (11.3%)4 (5.9%)
Gestational age at delivery 38.9 ± 1.137.8 ± 339.1 ± 3.338.8 ± 240.1 ± 1.139.5 ± 1.8n.s.
Mode of delivery
Spontaneous delivery, no. (%)30 (33.7%)12 (27.3%)10 (45.5%)48 (40.7%)23 (43.4%)36 (52.9%)
caesarean section, no. (%)56 (62.9%)28 (63.6%)11 (50%)69 (58.5%)23 (43.4%)28 (41.2%)
vaginal assisted delivery, no. (%) 3 (3.4%)4 (9.1%)1 (4.5%)1 (0.8%)7 (13.2%)4 (5.9%)
Women with chronic hypertension had a significantly higher prepregnancy BMI and a higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure at study entry (Table 1). There were no significant differences in maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure at study entry between women with APS/SLE, maternal thrombophilia, preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy, pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia, and controls (Table 1). Early onset preeclampsia occurred in three women with chronic hypertension, in two women with APS/SLE, in one woman with thrombophilia (APC-resistance), and in seven women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy, with HELLP syndrome complicating two of them. One woman with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia developed early onset preeclampsia and one woman of the control group. Late onset preeclampsia occurred in thirteen women with chronic hypertension, in six women with APS/SLE, and in seven women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy. Six women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia developed late onset preeclampsia and three women of the control group. IUGR was present in ten pregnancies; two in women with chronic hypertension, preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy, and in controls, respectively, as well as in four women with APS/SLE. Seventy women (78.6%) with chronic hypertension received LDA (25.7% 75 mg; 37.1% 100 mg; 37.1% 150 mg), starting at first trimester, in 30 cases (42.9%) due to a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia (Table 1). From the beginning of pregnancy, 40 women (90.9%) with APS/SLE received LDA (10% 75 mg; 57.5% 100 mg; 32.5% 150mg). Women (84.1%) with APS/SLE received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin) from diagnosis of pregnancy until 6 weeks postpartum (Table 1). Receiving LMWH from the beginning of pregnancy until 6 weeks postpartum were 21 women with APS/SLE (95.5%), and 10 women (45.5%) received LDA (10% 75 mg; 50% 100 mg; 40% 150 mg), starting at first trimester, in two cases (20%) due to a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia. One hundred and ten (93.2 %) women with a history of preeclampsia received LDA (11% 75 mg; 54.7% 100 mg; 31.9% 150 mg) from the beginning of pregnancy (Table 1). After a few weeks, eight women stopped taking LDA self-reliant. Fifty-one women (96.2%) with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia received LDA (25.7% 75 mg; 50.4% 100 mg; 23.9% 150 mg). None of the women of the control group received LDA nor LMWH. Despite treatment with LDA, 22 women developed preeclampsia; only six of them developed preeclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation.

3.1. Longitudinal Changes of Sflt-1 /Plgf Ratio during Pregnancy in Women with Adverse Obstetric Outcome Compared to Women with Normal Pregnancies

The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in women with an adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with a normal pregnancy in all six study groups, starting between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation (Table 2). The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio increased with gestational age in both women with an adverse obstetric outcome and women with normal pregnancies, but to a much higher extent in women with adverse obstetric outcome (p < 0.001) (Figure 1, Table 2 and Table 3).
Table 2

Longitudinal changes of sFlt-1 /PlGF ratio during pregnancy in women with adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with normal pregnancies.

Adverse Obstetric Outcome (n = 54)Normal Obstetric Outcome (n = 339)PP Adj
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 11–14 weeks 24.92 (17.06–50.79)30.26 (20.85–39.64)0.4501.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 15–19 weeks 12.23 (7.53–19.42)12.14 (7.35–17.12)0.7391.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 20–24 weeks 8.95 (4.09–13.69)5.67 (3.69–8.56)0.0020.017
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 25–29 weeks 6.00 (3.20–20.84)3.02 (1.85–4.73)0.000p < 0.001
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 30–34 weeks 15.53 (7.78–69.13)3.66 (2.22–7.03)0.000p < 0.001
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 35–39 weeks 39.05 (15.82–102.61)12.48 (15.39–26.09)0.000p < 0.001
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≥ 40 weeks 47.23 (25.58–73.68)35.74 (20.50–51.29)0.1721.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio post-partum 47.24 (29.34–100.39)38.02 (23.50–50.51)0.1150.917
Figure 1

Longitudinal changes of soluble FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio during pregnancy in women with adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with normal pregnancies.

Table 3

Longitudinal changes of sFlt-1 /PlGF ratio during pregnancy.

ParametersFlt/PlGF Ratio
Fixed Part EstimateSEP
Intercept 9.511.81p < 0.001
outcome 3.144.910.52
visits 1.650.36p < 0.001
outcome*visits 5.891.04p < 0.001

3.2. Effect of Lda on Sflt-1/Plgf Ratio in Women with and without Adverse Obstetric Outcome

There was no effect of LDA on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with and without adverse obstetric outcome (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of low-dose aspirin (LDA) on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with adverse obstetric outcome.

Yes (n = 44)No (n = 10)PP Adj
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 11–14 weeks 25.46 (18.94–49.49)17.23 (15.24–84.12)0.4841.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 15–19 weeks 11.80 (7.39–21.31)15.45 (15.45–15.45)n.a.n.a.
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 20–24 weeks 8.22 (3.90–12.22)11.95 (8.06–23.31)0.0790.630
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 25–29 weeks 5.52 (3.05–19.96)16.43 (8.53–25.73)0.1711.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 30–34 weeks 14.39 (7.16–106.19)22.54 (8.16–59.23)0.9021.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio 35–39 weeks 37.49 (16.67–102.25)41.40 (12.53–116.06)0.8591.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≥ 40 weeks 43.16 (17.05–74.10)47.24 (33.99–158.25)0.5581.000
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio post-partum 56.42 (29.34–100.39)46.41 (28.19–194.60)0.8061.000
Additionally, there was no effect of LDA on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, regardless obstetric outcome (Table 5).
Table 5

Longitudinal changes of sFlt-1 /PlGF ratio during pregnancy.

ParametersFlt/PlGF Ratio
Fixed PartEstimateSEP
Intercept 12.123.130.000
ASS −1.993.790.599
visits 2.500.60p < 0.001
ASS*visits −0.390.740.593
SE=standard error

3.3. Effect of Lda on Sflt-1/Plgf Ratio in Different Study Groups

LDA treatment affected the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia (group 6) in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2). The use of LDA showed a trend towards an improved sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy (group 4), but results did not reach significance.
Figure 2

Effect of LDA on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia.

There was no effect of LDA on sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with chronic hypertension (group 1), in women with APS/SLE (group 2), in women with thrombophilia (group 3) and controls (group 5) (Table 6).
Table 6

Longitudinal changes of sFlt-1 /PlGF ratio during pregnancy.

ParametersFlt/PlGF Ratio
Fixed PartEstimateSEP
chronic hypertension
Intercept 2.0010.230.845
LDA 3.2011.360.778
visits 3.732.050.070
LDA *visits −0.172.290.940
APS/SLE
Intercept 7.0312.220.566
LDA 5.8312.750.648
visits 1.002.350.672
LDA *visits −0.262.460.915
thrombophilia
Intercept 26.8016.990.130
LDA −12.6525.340.623
visits 1.931.370.164
LDA*visits −2.051.950.297
history of adverse obstetric outcome
Intercept 11.2212.100.354
LDA 2.8212.550.822
visits 3.142.080.132
LDA*visits −1.972.180.368
pathologic first trimester screening
Intercept 42.7918.940.025
LDA −39.4719.660.046
visits −6.734.250.115
LDA*visits 10.784.360.015
SE=standard error

4. Discussion

The main finding of this prospective longitudinal study showed that the use of LDA affected the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia in a dose-dependent manner and showed a trend towards an improved sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy. Recent studies have suggested that aspirin and aspirin-like compounds have a variety of actions in addition to their well-studied ability to inhibit cyclooxygenases. Some of these effects may act via different pathways from those that enhance the trophoblast [26]. The effect of aspirin on angiogenic factors, such as sFlt-1 and PlGF is the subject of ongoing interest and has been examined in several in vitro studies [27,28,29,30,31]. Li et al. reported that aspirin seems to be able to block the production of sFlt1 in the placenta in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that aspirin exerts its therapeutic effects via cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition [27]. However, Xu et al. demonstrated in their in vitro study that aspirin improves trophoblast cell integration by inhibiting the effect of TNF-alpha via PGI2, but without affecting VEGF, PlGF and sFlt-1 [28]. Panagodage et al. revealed that aspirin modulates the production of cytokines and improves trophoblast function; additionally, it increases the secretion of PlGF from the trophoblast [29]. Su et al. investigated the effect of aspirin on trophoblast cell function and its effect on sFlt-1. The authors demonstrated that aspirin enhances cell invasiveness and inhibits sFlt-1 production in trophoblasts. Moreover, sFlt-1 itself also inhibits trophoblast invasion [30]. However, the underlying pathophysiology of how aspirin prevents preeclampsia is not fully understood. The interaction of aspirin, preeclampsia and angiogenic factors such as sFlt-1 and PlGF, the role with the disease process and if aspirin has, if any, an effect on angiogenic factors is still unknown. Mone et al. aimed to determine the impact of low-dose aspirin in low-risk pregnancies on several biomarkers such as PAPP-A and PlGF as well as on maternal blood pressure, fetal growth parameters, and histological findings of the placenta [31]. The authors could not find any significant impact of low-dose aspirin on these parameters. However, only 75 mg of aspirin was prescribed; it might be speculated that the results may be different with higher dosages. According to our results, LDA seems to have an effect on the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia. Murtoniemi et al. aimed to study the effect of LDA 100 mg on maternal PlGF concentrations in women with clinical risk factors for preeclampsia and of low-risk women and revealed an association of LDA and a higher increase in serum PlGF concentration in women at high risk for preeclampsia during pregnancy [32]. Our results confirm these findings and even show a dose-dependent effect of aspirin with the most prominent effects at a dosage of 150 mg. We were not able to detect the same effect in women with chronic hypertension, APS/SLE, thrombophilia, as well as in women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy; it might be speculated that the effectiveness of aspirin differs among various entities. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in women with an adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with a normal pregnancy in high- and low-risk pregnancies and showed an increasing trend throughout gestation Several studies already reported altered maternal concentrations of sFlt-1 and PlGF before and at the onset of preeclampsia [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] and therefore have a high predictive value [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Our results strongly support these finding. Khalil et al. investigated longitudinal changes of maternal serum concentrations of sFlt-1 and PlGF in 243 women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia [49]. The authors demonstrated a higher predictive value of repeated measurements of angiogenic factors compared to single measurements. However, they could not find any significant association of sFlt-1 and PlGF-levels and several maternal characteristics such as history of preeclampsia or chronic hypertension. These findings are in line with our results, as we were not able to reveal any significant differences of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio between women with chronic hypertension or a history of preeclampsia, as well as women with APS/SLE, thrombophilia, a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia and controls. Powers et al. aimed to reveal differences of angiogenic factors in 993 high-risk pregnancies throughout gestation, consisting of women with pre-existing diabetes, chronic hypertension, and preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy as well as multi-fetal pregnancies. The authors reported significantly higher levels of sFlt-1 and endoglin and significantly lower levels of PlGF in women who developed preeclampsia but also noted that these changes are similar to those in low-risk pregnant women. Additionally, they could not find any differences in concentrations of sFlt-1 and PlGF between women with or without aspirin prophylaxis treatment, suggesting that aspirin does not have a significant effect on the concentration of angiogenic factors [50].

5. Conclusions

We were able to reveal an association of LDA and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with a pathologic first trimester screening for preeclampsia and showed a dose-dependent effect of aspirin with the most prominent effects at a dosage of 150 mg. However, larger sample sizes are needed for a distinct interpretation and to confirm a specific trend of the statistical analysis. Additionally, we demonstrated that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in women with an adverse obstetric outcome compared to women with a normal pregnancy in high- and low- risk pregnancies and showed an increasing trend throughout gestation. The strengths of the present study are the prospective design of the study, as well as the longitudinal measurements of angiogenic factors every 4 weeks, the comparison of angiogenic factors in women with different risk factors for the development of preeclampsia, as well as the determination of an effect of LDA on angiogenic factors. A limitation of the study is the rather small sample size of individual study groups.
  49 in total

Review 1.  The pleiotropic functions of aspirin: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  A R Amin; M G Attur; M Pillinger; S B Abramson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Brett C Young; Richard J Levine; S Ananth Karumanchi
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.472

3.  Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors are of prognostic value in patients presenting to the obstetrical triage area with the suspicion of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Zeynep Alpay Savasan; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Giovanna Ogge; Eleazar Soto; Zhong Dong; Adi Tarca; Bhatti Gaurav; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-08-09

4.  The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP.

Authors:  A L Tranquilli; G Dekker; L Magee; J Roberts; B M Sibai; W Steyn; G G Zeeman; M A Brown
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Aspirin enhances trophoblast invasion and represses soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 production: a putative mechanism for preventing preeclampsia.

Authors:  Mei-Tsz Su; Chia-Yih Wang; Pei-Yin Tsai; Ting-Yu Chen; Hui-Ling Tsai; Pao-Lin Kuo
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme.

Authors:  J M Roberts; C A Hubel
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Evaluation of the Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin on Biochemical and Biophysical Biomarkers for Placental Disease in Low-Risk Pregnancy: Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter RCT.

Authors:  Fionnuala Mone; Cecilia Mulcahy; Peter McParland; Paul Downey; Marie Culliton; Orla C Maguire; Eoghan E Mooney; Philip Clarke; David Fitzgerald; Elizabeth Tully; Fergal D Malone; Fionnuala M McAuliffe
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Richard J Levine; Sharon E Maynard; Cong Qian; Kee-Hak Lim; Lucinda J England; Kai F Yu; Enrique F Schisterman; Ravi Thadhani; Benjamin P Sachs; Franklin H Epstein; Baha M Sibai; Vikas P Sukhatme; S Ananth Karumanchi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The effect of acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin) on trophoblast-endothelial interaction in vitro.

Authors:  Bei Xu; Renuka Shanmugalingam; Katrina Chau; Suzanne Pears; Annemarie Hennessy; Angela Makris
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.054

Review 10.  Early prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Leona C Poon; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-07-17
View more
  3 in total

1.  Preeclampsia: Linking Placental Ischemia with Maternal Endothelial and Vascular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Bhavisha A Bakrania; Frank T Spradley; Heather A Drummond; Babbette LaMarca; Michael J Ryan; Joey P Granger
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  Prognostic Value of Angiogenic Markers in Pregnant Women With Chronic Hypertension.

Authors:  Julia Binder; Pilar Palmrich; Erkan Kalafat; Petra Pateisky; Ebru Öztürk; Johanna Mittelberger; Asma Khalil
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 3.  Imbalances in circulating angiogenic factors in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia and related disorders.

Authors:  Sarosh Rana; Suzanne D Burke; S Ananth Karumanchi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.