| Literature DB >> 31509977 |
Kyung-Hyun Cho1,2,3, Hye-Jeong Park4,5, Suk-Jeong Kim6,7, Jae-Ryong Kim8.
Abstract
A low serum high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol (HDL-C) level is a risk factor of cardiovascular disease and dementia. On the other hand, no study has elucidated the correlation between household income and the HDL-C level in the adult population. In the present study, 5535 subjects (20-80 year-old individuals) were selected from the Korean national health and nutrition examination survey 2017 (KNHANES VII-2, n = 2469 men, n = 3066 women). They were classified into five levels of household income grades ranging from one (the lowest) to five (the highest). They were also classified according to the HDL-C level: category 1 (<40 mg/dL, n = 943), category 2 (40-49 mg/dL, n = 1764), category 3 (50-59 mg/dL, n = 1572), category 4 (60-69 mg/dL, n = 820), and category 5 (≥70 mg/dL, n = 436). Generally, in both genders, a higher HDL-C level is associated with a larger percentage of income grades 4 and 5. Moreover, the lowest HDL-C group showed the largest percentage of income grade 1. In both groups, a significant increase in the average income grade was associated with a concomitant increase in the HDL-C level (men, p = 0.03, women, p < 0.001). In the low HDL-C category, a lower income grade is associated directly with a lower HDL-C level, which suggests that poverty is associated directly with a low HDL-C. Women showed a 3.3-fold higher incidence of dementia than men did at later-life. The sharp decrease in HDL-C in the female group older than 50 was accompanied by a dramatic increase in the incidence of dementia. However, the male group showed a relatively mild decrease in the HDL-C level after mid-life and weak elevation in the incidence of dementia. In conclusion, in both genders, the lower income group showed a larger prevalence of low-HDL-C levels. The decrease in HDL-C after middle age was strongly associated with the considerable increase in dementia in later-life.Entities:
Keywords: cholesterol; dementia; dyslipidemia; high-density lipoproteins; house-hold income
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31509977 PMCID: PMC6765955 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Inclusion criteria and subject number in analysis. HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. TC, total cholesterol. TG, triglycerides. M: men. F: Female.
General characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | Men | Women | * | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 51.3 ± 16.4 | 51.9 ± 16.3 | 0.147 | 51.6 ± 16.4 | ||||||
| TC (mg/dL) | 191.3 ± 38.0 | 194.9 ± 38.1 | 0.0004 | 193.3 ± 38.1 | ||||||
| TG (mg/dL) | 158.8 ± 126.1 | 113.4 ± 74.8 | <0.001 | 133.6 ± 103.4 | ||||||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 47.2 ± 11.1 | 54.4 ± 12.4 | <0.001 | 51.2 ± 12.4 | ||||||
| HDL-C category | N (%) | Age | N (%) | Age | N (%) | Age | ||||
| <40 | 628 (25.4) | 34.8 ± 3.8 | 54.3 ± 15.8 | 315 (10.3) | 35.3 ± 3.5 | 61.3 ± 14.9 | 0.028 | 943 (17.0) | 35.0 ± 3.7 | 56.6 ± 15.8 |
| 40–49 | 950 (38.5) | 44.5 ± 2.8 | 50.4 ± 16.3 | 814 (26.5) | 45.0 ± 2.8 | 54.5 ± 16.1 | 0.0003 | 1764 (31.9) | 44.7 ± 2.8 | 52.3 ± 16.3 |
| 50–59 | 584 (23.7) | 53.9 ± 2.8 | 50.2 ± 16.6 | 988 (32.3) | 54.4 ± 2.8 | 50.8 ± 16.1 | 0.002 | 1572 (28.4) | 54.2 ± 2.8 | 50.6 ± 16.3 |
| 60–69 | 206 (8.3) | 63.3 ± 2.7 | 49.7 ± 17.1 | 614 (20.0) | 64.0 ± 2.9 | 48.6 ± 16.3 | 0.009 | 820 (14.8) | 63.8 ± 2.9 | 48.9 ± 16.5 |
| >70 | 101 (4.1) | 77.5 ± 7.6 | 49.5 ± 17.6 | 335 (10.9) | 78.1 ± 8.0 | 45.8 ± 14.0 | 0.499 | 436 (7.9) | 77.9 ± 7.9 | 46.7 ± 15.0 |
| Glucose | 104.3 ± 26.6 | 98.8 ± 22.7 | <0.001 | 101.2 ± 24.7 | ||||||
| Income grade | 3.3 ± 1.4 | 3.15 ± 1.4 | 0.00006 | 3.22 ± 1.4 | ||||||
| 1 | 329 (13.4) | 1 | 63.2 ± 17.0 | 496 (16.2) | 1 | 67.9 ± 12.7 | 825 (14.9) | 1 | 66.0 ± 14.7 | |
| 2 | 433 (17.5) | 2 | 56.9 ± 16.7 | 575 (18.8) | 2 | 54.9 ± 16.2 | 1008 (18.2) | 2 | 55.8 ± 16.4 | |
| 3 | 512 (20.7) | 3 | 49.4 ± 15.9 | 652 (21.3) | 3 | 48.9 ± 15.4 | 1164 (21.0) | 3 | 49.1 ± 15.6 | |
| 4 | 561 (22.7) | 4 | 46.9 ± 14.2 | 663 (21.5) | 4 | 46.1 ± 14.1 | 1224 (22.1) | 4 | 46.4 ± 14.1 | |
| 5 | 634 (25.7) | 5 | 46.6 ± 14.0 | 680 (22.2) | 5 | 46.1 ± 13.2 | 1314 (23.8) | 5 | 46.3 ± 13.6 | |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or N (%). * p value for difference between men and women (p < 0.05). TC, total cholesterol. TG, triglycerides. HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. %HDL-C, (HDL-C/TC) * 100.
Distribution of age and income grade depends on HDL-C. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or N (%). * p value for difference between men and women (p < 0.05).
| Characteristics | Men | Women | * | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||||
| Age | |||||||
| 20–29 | 300 (12.2) | 49.9 ± 11.1 | 327 (10.7) | 58.1 ± 11.3 | <0.001 | 627 (11.3) | 54.2 ± 11.9 |
| 30–39 | 376 (15.2) | 47.2 ±10.2 | 460 (15.0) | 57.9 ± 12.4 | <0.001 | 836 (15.1) | 53.1 ± 12.7 |
| 40–49 | 454 (18.4) | 47.3 ±10.6 | 585 (19.1) | 56.0 ± 12.6 | <0.001 | 1039 (18.8) | 52.2 ± 12.5 |
| 50–59 | 502 (20.3) | 46.8 ±11.2 | 617 (20.1) | 55.2 ± 12.4 | <0.001 | 1119 (20.2) | 51.4 ± 12.6 |
| 60–69 | 435 (17.6) | 47.0 ±11.6 | 564 (18.4) | 51.7 ± 12.0 | <0.001 | 999 (18.0) | 49.6 ± 12.0 |
| 70–79 | 320 (13.0) | 45.7 ±11.7 | 387 (12.6) | 50.2 ± 11.4 | <0.001 | 707 (12.8) | 48.1 ± 11.8 |
| <80 | 82 (3.3) | 45.9 ± 10.9 | 126 (4.1) | 46.6 ± 10.9 | 0.656 | 208 (3.8) | 46.3 ± 10.9 |
| Income grade | |||||||
| 1 | 329 (13.3) | 46.4 ± 12.8 | 496 (16.2) | 50.4 ± 12.0 | 0.000006 | 825 (14.9) | 48.8 ± 12.5 |
| 2 | 433 (17.5) | 46.9 ± 11.7 | 575 (18.8) | 52.6 ± 11.7 | <0.001 | 1008 (18.2) | 50.1 ± 12.0 |
| 3 | 512 (20.7) | 47.2 ± 10.8 | 652 (21.3) | 54.6 ± 12.3 | <0.001 | 1164 (21.0) | 51.4 ± 12.2 |
| 4 | 561 (22.7) | 47.6 ± 10.3 | 663 (21.6) | 56.5 ± 12.8 | <0.001 | 1224 (22.1) | 52.4 ± 12.5 |
| 5 | 634 (25.8) | 47.4 ± 10.7 | 680 (22.1) | 56.7 ± 12.3 | <0.001 | 1314 (23.8) | 52.2 ± 12.4 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or N (%). * p value for the difference between men and women (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Distribution of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) category percentage according to household income grade quintile in men (A) and women (B): KNHANES 2017. Category 1, HDL-C ≤ 39 mg/dL. Category 2, 40 mg/dL ≤ HDL-C ≤49 mg/dL. Category 3, 50 mg/dL ≤ HDL-C ≤ 59 mg/dL. Category 4, 60 mg/dL ≤ HDL-C ≤ 69 mg/dL. Category 5, 70 mg/dL ≤ HDL-C.
Figure 3Distribution of household income grade percentage, according to the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) category in men (A) and women (B): KNHANES 2017.
Figure 4Mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels according to the household income grade in men and women (A). The mean household income grade levels according to the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) category in men and women (B). KNHANES 2017. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean).
Figure 5(A). Mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels according to age in men and women from KNHANES 2017. (B). Incidence of dementia according to age in men and women in 2017. The data are the mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean).