Literature DB >> 31507292

Optimizing the Spacing of Retrieval Practice to Improve Pharmacy Students' Learning of Drug Names.

James Terenyi1, Heidi Anksorus1, Adam M Persky1,2.   

Abstract

Objective. To optimize student pharmacists' long-term retention of brand and generic drug names through spacing and modification of quiz format. Methods. In three experiments, student pharmacists learned brand and generic names for the Top 200 medications taught in a self-paced course. The students completed two spaced quizzes on the course content, a final examination, and a measure of long-term retention administered several weeks after the course was completed. Experiment 1 examined the spacing of quiz 2 relative to quiz 1 and the final examination. Experiment 2 examined whether providing hints such as giving the first 3 letters of the paired associate impacted learning. Experiment 3 examined whether providing more elaborate context improved student retention. Results. When quiz 2 was administered closer to quiz 1 but further from the final examination (expanding practice), students' long-term knowledge retention was greatest. When the first three letters of the paired associate were provided, students' long-term retention decreased. When more elaborative context was provided within the quizzes, students' long-term retention was unaffected despite higher final examination performance. Conclusion. Making retrieval of concepts easier reduces pharmacy students' long-term knowledge retention, albeit only a small effect was seen in this study. In addition, providing more elaborative context in terms of drug class and indication during retrieval did not improve students' learning.

Keywords:  brand; generic; self-pace; spacing; testing effect; top 200

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31507292      PMCID: PMC6718484          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

Review 1.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Andrew C Butler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

Authors:  Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin; Matthew J Hays; Robert A Bjork; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

5.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

Review 6.  The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.

Authors:  Christopher A Rowland
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Impact of Spacing of Practice on Learning Brand Name and Generic Drugs.

Authors:  James Terenyi; Heidi Anksorus; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.

Authors:  Carolina E Küpper-Tetzel; Irina V Kapler; Melody Wiseheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.