Literature DB >> 25150680

The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.

Christopher A Rowland1.   

Abstract

Engaging in a test over previously studied information can serve as a potent learning event, a phenomenon referred to as the testing effect. Despite a surge of research in the past decade, existing theories have not yet provided a cohesive account of testing phenomena. The present study uses meta-analysis to examine the effects of testing versus restudy on retention. Key results indicate support for the role of effortful processing as a contributor to the testing effect, with initial recall tests yielding larger testing benefits than recognition tests. Limited support was found for existing theoretical accounts attributing the testing effect to enhanced semantic elaboration, indicating that consideration of alternative mechanisms is warranted in explaining testing effects. Future theoretical accounts of the testing effect may benefit from consideration of episodic and contextually derived contributions to retention resulting from memory retrieval. Additionally, the bifurcation model of the testing effect is considered as a viable framework from which to characterize the patterns of results present across the literature. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150680     DOI: 10.1037/a0037559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  98 in total

1.  Semantic knowledge influences whether novel episodic associations are represented symmetrically or asymmetrically.

Authors:  Vencislav Popov; Qiong Zhang; Griffin E Koch; Regina C Calloway; Marc N Coutanche
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

2.  Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Katherine A Rawson; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  How Mixed-Effects Modeling Can Advance Our Understanding of Learning and Memory and Improve Clinical and Educational Practice.

Authors:  Katherine R Gordon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adding the keyword mnemonic to retrieval practice: A potent combination for foreign language vocabulary learning?

Authors:  Toshiya Miyatsu; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

6.  Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.

Authors:  William J Hopper; David E Huber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

Review 7.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

8.  Memory and availability-biased metacognitive illusions for flags of varying familiarity.

Authors:  Adam B Blake; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

9.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

10.  A Review of the Application of Distributed Practice Principles to Naming Treatment in Aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Julia Schuchard; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.