Yifan Wang1, Abdulaziz Alnumay1, Tiffany Paradis1, Andrew Beckett1, Paola Fata1, Kosar Khwaja1, Tarek Razek1,2, Jeremy Grushka1, Dan L Deckelbaum3,4. 1. Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. 2. Centre for Global Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. dan.deckelbaum@mcgill.ca. 4. Centre for Global Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. dan.deckelbaum@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Management of the post-traumatic open abdomen (OA) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone is associated with low rates of primary fascial closure. The abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system exerts dynamic medial fascial traction and may work synergistically with NPWT to facilitate primary fascial closure. METHODS: Patients with an OA following trauma laparotomy between 2009 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients treated with ABRA in conjunction with NPWT (ABRA) versus NPWT alone (NPWT) were compared in terms of primary fascial closure rate, number of surgeries to closure, tracheostomy duration, length of stay and incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify predictors of tracheostomy duration. RESULTS: We identified 48 patients [ABRA, 12 and NPWT, 36]. The ABRA group was significantly younger (25 vs. 37 years, p = 0.027) and included a lower proportion of males (58% vs. 89%, p = 0.032). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of hollow viscus injury, injury severity score and abdominal abbreviated injury score. Compared to the NPWT group, the ABRA group had a significantly higher rate of primary fascial closure (100% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), fewer surgeries to abdominal closure (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.023) and shorter duration of tracheostomy (15.5 vs. 36 days, p = 0.008). There were no differences in length of stay or incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. On multivariable linear regression, ABRA placement was an independent predictor of shorter tracheostomy duration, after adjusting for covariates (β = - 0.294, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: For the post-traumatic OA, ABRA coupled with NPWT achieves a higher rate of primary fascial closure compared to NPWT alone, while requiring fewer surgeries and a shorter duration of tracheostomy.
BACKGROUND: Management of the post-traumatic open abdomen (OA) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone is associated with low rates of primary fascial closure. The abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system exerts dynamic medial fascial traction and may work synergistically with NPWT to facilitate primary fascial closure. METHODS:Patients with an OA following trauma laparotomy between 2009 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients treated with ABRA in conjunction with NPWT (ABRA) versus NPWT alone (NPWT) were compared in terms of primary fascial closure rate, number of surgeries to closure, tracheostomy duration, length of stay and incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify predictors of tracheostomy duration. RESULTS: We identified 48 patients [ABRA, 12 and NPWT, 36]. The ABRA group was significantly younger (25 vs. 37 years, p = 0.027) and included a lower proportion of males (58% vs. 89%, p = 0.032). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of hollow viscus injury, injury severity score and abdominal abbreviated injury score. Compared to the NPWT group, the ABRA group had a significantly higher rate of primary fascial closure (100% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), fewer surgeries to abdominal closure (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.023) and shorter duration of tracheostomy (15.5 vs. 36 days, p = 0.008). There were no differences in length of stay or incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. On multivariable linear regression, ABRA placement was an independent predictor of shorter tracheostomy duration, after adjusting for covariates (β = - 0.294, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: For the post-traumatic OA, ABRA coupled with NPWT achieves a higher rate of primary fascial closure compared to NPWT alone, while requiring fewer surgeries and a shorter duration of tracheostomy.
Authors: Kritaya Kritayakirana; Paul M Maggio; Susan Brundage; Mary-Anne Purtill; Kristan Staudenmayer; David A Spain Journal: J Emerg Trauma Shock Date: 2010-04
Authors: Matthew J Bradley; Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James F Whelan; Rao R Ivatury Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Michael L Cheatham; Demetrios Demetriades; Timothy C Fabian; Mark J Kaplan; William S Miles; Martin A Schreiber; John B Holcomb; Grant Bochicchio; Babak Sarani; Michael F Rotondo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: A G Willms; R Schwab; M W von Websky; F Berrevoet; D Tartaglia; K Sörelius; R H Fortelny; M Björck; T Monchal; F Brennfleck; D Bulian; C Beltzer; C T Germer; J F Lock Journal: Hernia Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 2.920