Literature DB >> 8371295

'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury.

M F Rotondo1, C W Schwab, M D McGonigal, G R Phillips, T M Fruchterman, D R Kauder, B A Latenser, P A Angood.   

Abstract

Definitive laparotomy (DL) for penetrating abdominal wounding with combined vascular and visceral injury is a difficult surgical challenge. Physiologic derangements such as dilutional coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis often preclude completion of the procedure. "Damage control" (DC), defined as initial control of hemorrhage and contamination followed by intraperitoneal packing and rapid closure, allows for resuscitation to normal physiology in the intensive care unit and subsequent definitive re-exploration. The purpose of the study was to compare the damage control technique with definitive laparotomy. Over a 3 1/2-year period, 46 patients with penetrating abdominal injuries required laparotomy and urgent transfusion of greater than 10 units packed red blood cells for exsanguination. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for degree and pattern of injury, probability of survival, actual survival, transfusion requirements for the preoperative and postoperative phases, resuscitation and operative times, lowest perioperative temperature, pH, and HCO3. No significant differences were identified between 22 DL and 24 DC patients and actual survival rates were similar (55% DC vs. 58% DL). However, in a subset of 22 patients with major vascular injury and two or more visceral injuries (maximum injury subset), otherwise similar to the overall group, survival was markedly improved in patients treated with damage control (10 of 13, 77%*) vs. DLM (1 of 9, 11%) (Fisher's exact test, * p < 0.02). In preparation for return to the operating room, DC survivors averaged 8.4 units of packed red blood cells transfused and 10.3 units fresh frozen plasma over a mean ICU stay of 31.7 hours. Resolution of coagulopathy (mean prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time 19.5/70.4 to 13.3/34.9), normalization of acid-base balance (mean pH/HCO3 7.37/20.6 to 7.42/24.2), and core rewarming (mean 33.2 degrees C to 37.7 degrees C) were achieved. All patients had gastrointestinal procedures at reoperation (mean operative time, 4.3 hours). We conclude that damage control is a promising approach for increased survival in exsanguinating patients with major vascular and multiple visceral penetrating abdominal injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  271 in total

Review 1.  The tenets of intrathoracic packing during damage control thoracic surgery for trauma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramiro Manzano-Nunez; Julian Chica; Alexandra Gómez; Maria P Naranjo; Harold Chaves; Luis E Muñoz; Javier E Rengifo; Isabella Caicedo-Holguin; Juan C Puyana; Alberto F García
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Creation, implementation, and maturation of a massive transfusion protocol for the exsanguinating trauma patient.

Authors:  Timothy C Nunez; Pampee P Young; John B Holcomb; Bryan A Cotton
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-06

3.  Packing for damage control of nontraumatic intra-abdominal massive hemorrhages.

Authors:  Filippo Filicori; Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Casali; Andrea Biscardi; Franco Baldoni; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  [The "Würzburg T". A concept for optimization of early multiple trauma care in the emergency department].

Authors:  H Kuhnigk; B Steinhübel; T Keil; N Roewer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Suicide bombing attacks: update and modifications to the protocol.

Authors:  Gidon Almogy; Howard Belzberg; Yoaz Mintz; Alon K Pikarsky; Gideon Zamir; Avraham I Rivkind
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction. what are the real numbers?

Authors:  Ruben Peralta; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Song Liang; Karla Russek; Morris E Franklin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients).

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Dieter Rixen; John Morley; Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye; Michael Mueller; Clemens Dumont; Andreas Gruner; Hans Joerg Oestern; Michael Bayeff-Filoff; Christina Garving; Dustin Pardini; Martijn van Griensven; Christian Krettek; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Computed tomography-defined abdominal adiposity is associated with acute kidney injury in critically ill trauma patients*.

Authors:  Michael G S Shashaty; Esra Kalkan; Scarlett L Bellamy; John P Reilly; Daniel N Holena; Kathleen Cummins; Paul N Lanken; Harold I Feldman; Muredach P Reilly; Jayaram K Udupa; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  [Surgical management of abdominal injury].

Authors:  G Matthes; K Bauwens; A Ekkernkamp; D Stengel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.