IMPORTANCE: Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), and intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess (IAS) are major challenges for surgeons caring for patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma. OBJECTIVE: To determine independent predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma, using the AAST Open Abdomen Registry. DESIGN: The AAST Open Abdomen registry of patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy was used to identify patients who developed ECF, EAF, or IAS and to compare these patients with those without these complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare these groups of patients. Variables from univariate analyses differing at P < .20 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for ECF, EAF, or IAS. SETTING: Fourteen level I trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 517 patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Complication of ECF, EAF, or IAS. RESULTS: More patients in the ECF/EAF/IAS group than in the group without these complications underwent bowel resection (63 of 111 patients [57%] vs 133 of 406 patients [33%]; P < .001). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, the ECF/EAF/IAS group received more colloids (P < .03) and total fluids (P < .03) than did the group without these complications. The ECF/EAF/IAS group underwent almost twice as many abdominal reexplorations as did the group without these complications (mean [SD] number, 4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of ECF/EAF/IAS were a large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.56 [95% CI, 1.88-6.76]; P < .001), a total fluid intake at 48 hours of between 5 and 10 L (AOR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.15-3.88]; P = .02) or more than 10 L (AOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.04-3.57]; P = .04), and an increasing number of reexplorations (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Large bowel resection, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an increasing number of abdominal reexplorations were statistically significant predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.
IMPORTANCE: Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), and intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess (IAS) are major challenges for surgeons caring for patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma. OBJECTIVE: To determine independent predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma, using the AAST Open Abdomen Registry. DESIGN: The AAST Open Abdomen registry of patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy was used to identify patients who developed ECF, EAF, or IAS and to compare these patients with those without these complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare these groups of patients. Variables from univariate analyses differing at P < .20 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for ECF, EAF, or IAS. SETTING: Fourteen level I trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 517 patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Complication of ECF, EAF, or IAS. RESULTS: More patients in the ECF/EAF/IAS group than in the group without these complications underwent bowel resection (63 of 111 patients [57%] vs 133 of 406 patients [33%]; P < .001). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, the ECF/EAF/IAS group received more colloids (P < .03) and total fluids (P < .03) than did the group without these complications. The ECF/EAF/IAS group underwent almost twice as many abdominal reexplorations as did the group without these complications (mean [SD] number, 4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of ECF/EAF/IAS were a large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.56 [95% CI, 1.88-6.76]; P < .001), a total fluid intake at 48 hours of between 5 and 10 L (AOR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.15-3.88]; P = .02) or more than 10 L (AOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.04-3.57]; P = .04), and an increasing number of reexplorations (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Large bowel resection, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an increasing number of abdominal reexplorations were statistically significant predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.
Authors: Shuyan Wei; Charles Green; Lillian S Kao; Brandy B Padilla-Jones; Van Thi Thanh Truong; Charles E Wade; John A Harvin Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; Michael S Walters; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Azra Bihorac; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; Robert Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: Shock Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Guillaume Giudicelli; A Rossetti; C Scarpa; N C Buchs; R Hompes; R J Guy; K Ukegjini; P Morel; F Ris; M Adamina Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.313