| Literature DB >> 31506065 |
Rick J Jansen1,2,3, Lin Tong4, Maria Argos5, Farzana Jasmine4, Muhammad Rakibuz-Zaman6, Golam Sarwar6, Md Tariqul Islam6, Hasan Shahriar6, Tariqul Islam6, Mahfuzar Rahman6,7, Md Yunus8, Muhammad G Kibriya4, John A Baron9, Habibul Ahsan10,11,12, Brandon L Pierce13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is well-known that methylation changes occur as humans age, however, understanding how age-related changes in DNA methylation vary by sex is lacking. In this study, we characterize the effect of age on DNA methylation in a sex-specific manner and determine if these effects vary by genomic context. We used the Illumina HumanMethylation 450 K array and DNA derived from whole blood for 400 adult participants (189 males and 211 females) from Bangladesh to identify age-associated CpG sites and regions and characterize the location of these age-associated sites with respect to CpG islands (vs. shore, shelf, or open sea) and gene regions (vs. intergenic). We conducted a genome-wide search for age-associated CpG sites (among 423,604 sites) using a reference-free approach to adjust for cell type composition (the R package RefFreeEWAS) and performed an independent replication analysis of age-associated CpGs.Entities:
Keywords: Age prediction model; Age-associated; Cell type adjustment; Genome-wide; Methylation; RefFreeEWAS; Sex-specific
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31506065 PMCID: PMC6734473 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6039-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Characteristics of study participants, by sex
| Males ( | Females ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | ||
| Age | 0.0099* | ||||
| <35 | 36 | 19.0 | 50 | 23.7 | |
| ≥35-<45 | 61 | 32.3 | 53 | 25.1 | |
| ≥45-<55 | 67 | 35.4 | 57 | 27.0 | |
| ≥55 | 25 | 13.2 | 51 | 24.2 | |
| BMI | 0.2527* | ||||
| <18.5 | 65 | 34.4 | 87 | 41.2 | |
| ≥18.5-<24.5 | 99 | 52.4 | 106 | 50.2 | |
| ≥24.5 | 25 | 13.2 | 18 | 8.5 | |
| Smoking | < 0.0001* | ||||
| Never | 7 | 3.7 | 102 | 48.3 | |
| Ever | 182 | 96.3 | 109 | 51.7 | |
| Urinary Total Arsenic Concentration (μg/g) | 0.0004* | ||||
| <15 | 62 | 32.8 | 36 | 17.1 | |
| ≥15 - < 37.5 | 48 | 25.4 | 54 | 25.6 | |
| ≥37.5 - < 104.2 | 46 | 24.3 | 54 | 25.6 | |
| ≥104.2 | 33 | 17.5 | 67 | 31.8 | |
| mean | range | mean | range | ||
| Average Blood Cell Percentages (estimated by MethylSpectrum) | |||||
| CD8T | 0.22 | 0.07–0.38 | 0.2 | 0.05–0.42 | 0.0437* |
| CD4T | 0.07 | 0–0.25 | 0.05 | 0–0.23 | 0.0016* |
| NK | 0.02 | 0–0.09 | 0.03 | 0–0.09 | < 0.0001* |
| Bcell | 0.08 | 0.03–0.20 | 0.08 | 0.02–0.15 | 0.8230* |
| Mono | 0.07 | 0–0.14 | 0.08 | 0–0.15 | 0.0046* |
| Gran | 0.48 | 0.34–0.63 | 0.49 | 0.31–0.70 | 0.0909* |
Abreviations: N Number, % Percent
*Chi-squared test used for categorical variable and t-test used for continuous variables
Fig. 1Manhattan plot showing the association between age and CpG sites for 211 women (top) and 189 men (bottom). Horizontal black line indicates p =5 × 10− 8
Fig. 2Correlation between chronological age and predicated age using Horvath [40] identified age-related CpG markers among 211 women and 189 men. Colored lines in the plot represent loess lines of best fit and the black line represents perfect correlation
Fig. 3a) Proportion of hyper-methylation vs. hypo-methylation among age-associated CpGs (p < 5 x 10− 8) by genomic region, stratified by sex. b) Log2 odds ratio using the median unbiased estimate and the mid-p exact 95% confidence interval were used to compare women to men by genomic region in aggregate table format. All Fisher exact tests comparing the proportiontion of hyper-methylation (vs. hypo-methylation) within individual categories to "all regions" were significant among either men or women with all p < 4.5 x 10− 8. For Fisher exact tests comparing the proportion of hyper-methylation (vs. hypomethlylation) between men and women within each category, only shore and open sea where significant with p = 0.0001 and 0.0342, respectively
Fig. 4Proportion of CpGs residing in genomic regions defined by CpG density. All but the red bar represents age-associated CpGs. Fisher exact tests comparing enrichment/depletion within individual categories to all categories were significant (p < 2 x 10-11) among men for island, shelf, and open sea regions and among women for all four categories (p = 3.8 x 10-5). Fisher exact tests comparing enrichment/depletion within categories between men and women were significant for island (p = 0.0071) and shore (p = 0.0015) regions
Fig. 5a) Proportion of hyper-methylated and hypo-methylated CpGs among age-associated CpGs (p < 5 x 10− 8) by relationship to gene category, stratified by sex. b) Log2 odds ratio using the median unbiased estimate and mid-p exact 95% confidence interval were used to compare women to men within each category in aggregate table format. Fisher exact tests comparing the proportion of hyper-methylation (vs. hypo-methylation) within individual categories to all categories were significant among men for TSS200 (p = 0.0001), first exon (p = 7.3 x 10-11), and body (p = 0.0001) regions and among women for TSS1500 (p = 1.2 x 10-11), TSS200 (p = 1.6 x 10-9), first exon (p = 2.2 x 10-16), and body (p = 0.0034) regions. For Fisher exact tests comparing hyper-methylation between men and women within each category, only body (p = 0.0125) was significant
Fig. 6Proportion of age-associated CpGs residing in regions defined by gene features. The red bar represents all measured CpGs. Fisher exact tests comparing enrichment/depletion within individual categories to all categories were significant among men for first exon (p = 5.7 x 10-6) and body (p = 0.0002) regions and among women for TSS1500 (p = 0.0337), TSS200 (p = 3.5 x 10-5), 5′ UTR (p = 0.0307), first exon (p = 7.9 x 10-5), body (p = 0.0003), and intergenic (p = 0.0054). Fisher exact tests comparing enrichment/depletion within individual categories between men and women were significant for TSS200 (p = 0.0016) and first exon (p = 0.0419)
Fig. 7Scatterplots of CpG beta values and the expression of its Illumina-assigned gene (right-hand side) and scatterplots of the expression of the same Illumina-assigned gene by age (left side). CpGs and gene pairs were chosen based on significant age interactions within the regression model. All plots distinguish points as female (salmon color) or male (blue color) and include a linear line of best fit for each sex