Literature DB >> 25678027

Accelerated epigenetic aging in Down syndrome.

Steve Horvath1, Paolo Garagnani, Maria Giulia Bacalini, Chiara Pirazzini, Stefano Salvioli, Davide Gentilini, Anna Maria Di Blasio, Cristina Giuliani, Spencer Tung, Harry V Vinters, Claudio Franceschi.   

Abstract

Down Syndrome (DS) entails an increased risk of many chronic diseases that are typically associated with older age. The clinical manifestations of accelerated aging suggest that trisomy 21 increases the biological age of tissues, but molecular evidence for this hypothesis has been sparse. Here, we utilize a quantitative molecular marker of aging (known as the epigenetic clock) to demonstrate that trisomy 21 significantly increases the age of blood and brain tissue (on average by 6.6 years, P = 7.0 × 10(-14)).
© 2015 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; Down syndrome; biomarker of aging; epigenetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25678027      PMCID: PMC4406678          DOI: 10.1111/acel.12325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Cell        ISSN: 1474-9718            Impact factor:   9.304


Introduction

Down Syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of all or part of a third copy of chromosome 21 (trisomy 21; +21). It is not only associated with intellectual disability but also with a group of clinical manifestations of ‘accelerated aging’ (Devenny et al., 2005; Patterson & Cabelof, 2012; Moran, 2013). Adults with DS have a specific list of conditions with accelerated age at onset, including premature skin wrinkling, greying of hair, hypogonadism, early menopause, hypothyroidism, declining immune function, and Alzheimer's disease. However, as recently reviewed (Zigman, 2013), accelerated aging in DS is atypical and segmental, involving some but not all organs and tissues. Of particular interest are the brain (Lott & Head, 2005; Teipel & Hampel, 2006) and the immune system (Cuadrado & Barrena, 1996). Certain functional abnormalities of lymphocytes can be interpreted as precocious immunosenescence (Kusters et al., 2011) but alternative interpretations are possible (Cuadrado & Barrena, 1996). Due to the limited availability of biomarkers of aging, it has been difficult to rigorously test whether DS is associated with accelerated aging effects, per se, versus specific vulnerabilities to conditions typically associated with old age (e.g., increased risk for Alzheimer's disease). One basic tenet is that a suitable biomarker of aging should detect accelerated aging effects in tissues (e.g., brain and blood) that exhibit clinical manifestations of accelerated aging in DS subjects. Telomere length can be used as a molecular aging marker and (Vaziri et al., 1993) reported that DS cases exhibited shorter leukocyte telomere length (LTL) than control subjects, with more recent data suggesting that shorter telomere length is associated with the presence of both dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults with DS (Jenkins et al., 2008). However, one study found no evidence that cultured skin fibroblasts from DS subjects attained replicative senescence (a telomere length-dependent phenomenon) earlier than those from controls (Kimura et al., 2005). Here, we study a new type of molecular marker of aging, our recently developed ‘epigenetic clock’, which is based on DNA methylation (DNAm) levels (Horvath, 2013). The epigenetic clock has several advantages over other methods. It is quantitative, it overcomes the technical difficulties that plague telomere length measurements and is applicable in all types and sources of tissues, importantly including cryopreserved banked specimens (Horvath, 2013). This epigenetic clock, which we defined by studying DNAm in series of human tissues across a range of chronological ages, is a prediction method of chronological age based on the DNAm levels of 353 specific CpGs. In normal individuals, the predicted (estimated) age is referred to as DNAm age. DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age across sorted cell types (CD4 T cells, monocytes, neurons), complex tissues (e.g., blood, brain, liver) (Horvath, 2013; Horvath et al., 2014). The epigenetic clock can be applied to two commercially standardized methylation platforms: the Illumina 450K and the 27K arrays. Our 4 DNAm data sets are described in Table1 and in the Methods. DNA methylation levels were assessed in peripheral blood leukocytes (data set 1; 27K array), various brain regions (from DS subjects, Alzheimer's disease subjects and controls, data set 2; 450K array), whole blood (data set 3; 450K array) and buccal epithelium (data set 4; 27K arrays).
Table 1

Overview of the DNA methylation data sets

Tissue sourcePlatformN (total)Perc. female, %N (DS)Mean Age (range)GEO IDCitationP-value
1. Leukocytes27K56703543 (22, 64)GSE25395Kerkel et al. (2010)0.0048
2. Brain450K71471553 (32, 64)GSE63347Current article5.5E-7
3. Whole blood27K87632933 (9,83)GSE52588Current article0.00056
4. Buccal epithelium27K20501034 (27, 47)GSE50586Jones et al. (2013b)0.26

The rows correspond to the data sets used in this article. Columns report the tissue source, DNAm platform, total number of samples (N), percent female, number of DS samples, mean age (and range, i.e., minimum age, maximum age), data access information, and citation. The last column reports a (Kruskal–Wallis test) P-value regarding the relationship between age acceleration and DS status. Additional details can be found in the Supporting Information.

Overview of the DNA methylation data sets The rows correspond to the data sets used in this article. Columns report the tissue source, DNAm platform, total number of samples (N), percent female, number of DS samples, mean age (and range, i.e., minimum age, maximum age), data access information, and citation. The last column reports a (Kruskal–Wallis test) P-value regarding the relationship between age acceleration and DS status. Additional details can be found in the Supporting Information. As expected, DNAm age has a strong positive correlation with chronological age in the control samples (0.74 < r < 0.95, Fig.1a–d). Therefore, we were able to define a measure of age acceleration as the residual resulting from a linear model that regressed DNAm age on chronological age in controls. By construction, this measure of age acceleration is not correlated with chronological age and takes on a positive value for samples whose DNAm age is higher than expected.
Fig 1

Analysis of 4 independent Down syndrome data sets. Each column corresponds to a different data set. The top row (a–d) shows scatter plots between chronological age (x-axis) and DNAm age (y-axis) in the 4 independent data sets. Red circles indicate DS, blue circles indicate Alzheimer's disease, and black squares denote control subjects. The orange line corresponds to a regression line through DS subjects. The black line in the upper panels indicates the regression line through the remaining (control) samples. The age acceleration effect for each subject (point) corresponds to the vertical distance to the black regression line. While DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age, red points tend to lie above the black line, which indicates that DS subjects exhibit accelerated aging effects. The bottom row (e–h) show how mean age acceleration (y-axis) relates to DS status. By definition, the mean age acceleration measure in controls is zero. The title of the bar plots also reports a P-value from a nonparametric group comparison test (Kruskal Wallis test). Each bar plot reports 1 SE.

Analysis of 4 independent Down syndrome data sets. Each column corresponds to a different data set. The top row (a–d) shows scatter plots between chronological age (x-axis) and DNAm age (y-axis) in the 4 independent data sets. Red circles indicate DS, blue circles indicate Alzheimer's disease, and black squares denote control subjects. The orange line corresponds to a regression line through DS subjects. The black line in the upper panels indicates the regression line through the remaining (control) samples. The age acceleration effect for each subject (point) corresponds to the vertical distance to the black regression line. While DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age, red points tend to lie above the black line, which indicates that DS subjects exhibit accelerated aging effects. The bottom row (e–h) show how mean age acceleration (y-axis) relates to DS status. By definition, the mean age acceleration measure in controls is zero. The title of the bar plots also reports a P-value from a nonparametric group comparison test (Kruskal Wallis test). Each bar plot reports 1 SE. Strikingly, we find that DS subjects exhibit a highly significant age acceleration effect in three independent data sets (P = 0.0048, P = 5.5×10-7, P = 0.00056 Fig.1e–g) involving blood and brain tissue. By contrast, we did not observe a significant age acceleration effect in buccal epithelium (P = 0.26, Fig.1h) which might reflect that clinical manifestations of accelerated aging have not been observed in this tissue. However, we caution the reader that data set 4 only involved 10 cases and 10 controls. Larger studies may succeed at detecting an accelerated aging effect in buccal epithelium. A meta-analysis applied to the blood and brain data sets shows that DS status is highly significantly (P = 7.0 × 10−14) associated with increased DNAm age (average 6.6 years, Table2).
Table 2

Estimation of the influence of DS on DNAm age

VariableData set 1Data set 2Data set 3Data set 4
LeukocytesBrainWhole bloodBuccal Epithel.
Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P
Chronological age0.95374 (0.06191)<2 × 10−160.74144 (0.0565)<2 × 10−160.79168 (0.02865)<2 × 10−160.9452 (0.1449)5.2 × 10−6
DS3.74593 (1.37252)8.6 × 10−38.53045 (1.23934)2.3 × 10−93.65564 (1.08842)1.2 × 10−32.6495 (1.7776)0.15
R-squared0.830.730.920.72
Age accel. for DS3.9 years11.5 years4.6 years2.8 years

Using a multivariate regression model DNAm age is regressed on chronological age and DS status. The table reports estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding standard errors, Wald test P-values. The last row reports the age acceleration associated with DS status. For example DS status is associated with an increase of 3.9 years (=3.74593/0.95374) in the first data set. The results for data sets 1–3 are largely unchanged after including blood cell type abundance measures as additional covariates (Table s1).

Estimation of the influence of DS on DNAm age Using a multivariate regression model DNAm age is regressed on chronological age and DS status. The table reports estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding standard errors, Wald test P-values. The last row reports the age acceleration associated with DS status. For example DS status is associated with an increase of 3.9 years (=3.74593/0.95374) in the first data set. The results for data sets 1–3 are largely unchanged after including blood cell type abundance measures as additional covariates (Table s1). Data set 2 shows that the brain tissue of DS subjects exhibits significantly higher age acceleration than that of AD subjects or controls (Fig.1f). These results can also be found when restricting attention to samples from the cerebellum, frontal lobe, or other brain regions (Fig. s1). Data set 3 involved blood from 29 individuals with DS, their mothers and their unaffected siblings. This design allows adjustment for possible confounding effects on DNA methylation patterns deriving from genetic and environmental (lifestyle) factors within families. To properly account for the family relationships, we also fit a mixed effects model to the 29 discordant sib pairs. Specifically, DNAm age was regressed on DS status, chronological age, and a random effects term (intercept) that encoded the sib ship. Using this model, we found that DS status significantly affected DNAm age (P = 0.00029), raising it by 3.86 years ± 1.03 (SE). Additional analyses examined potential confounders of gender and mean methylation levels. None of these factors contributed significantly to the effect of DS on DNAm age (e.g., Figs S2 and S3, Data S1). Several studies reported age-dependent defects in the innate and in the adaptive immune system of DS (Kusters et al., 2011), consisting in altered prevalence of the different lymphocyte subpopulations. In data sets 1, DS status is not significantly associated with blood cell type proportions (Fig. s4m–r). But using the discordant sib pair data from data set 3, we observe that DS subjects exhibit fewer CD4 T cells and B cells (Fig. s5n,p) and more Natural Killer cells (Fig. s5o). Considering that DNA methylation is cell type specific, differences in blood cell counts could confound the relationship between DS status and age acceleration effects. While no significant correlation can be found between proportions of blood cell types and age acceleration in data set 1 (Fig. s4a–f), we observe a significant negative correlation for CD4 T cells (Fig. s5b) and monocytes (Fig. s5e). But differences in blood cell counts do not explain the observed age acceleration effects as can be seen from the fact that DS status remains a significant predictor of DNAm age in a multivariate regression model that includes blood cell counts and chronological age (Table s1). Similarly, the results remain significant (Table s2) when using a ‘reference free’ method that does not require reference libraries of cell types (Houseman et al., 2014). Further, a structural equation model analysis shows that causal models that posit that changes in blood cell type abundance mediate the effect of DS on age acceleration do not fit our data (Table s3). Our observed results regarding the relationship between DS status and epigenetic age acceleration do not depend on any particular choice of aging signature (Fig. s6). In particular, they can also be found using an alternative age predictor described in (Hannum et al., 2013), and using aging signatures from (Teschendorff et al., 2010) and (Horvath et al., 2012). A marginal analysis that related individual CpGs to age, acceleration, and DS status can be found in Figs S7–10 and 2. As the epigenetic clock was constructed as a multivariate predictor, it is not surprising that most of the 353 clock CpGs do not exhibit a consistent age correlation across data sets (Fig. s7a–c). These results demonstrate that the total (epigenetic clock) is more than the sum of its parts. The marginal association of CpGs with epigenetic age acceleration is only moderately (r = 0.41) preserved between data sets 1 and 2 (Fig. s7d–f). Similarly, marginal associations with DS status are moderately preserved across the blood and brain data sets (Fig. s8a–c, e–f).
Fig 2

CpGs that relate to DS status tend to be correlated with age acceleration. (a–c) Results for data sets 1–3, respectively. d) Results of a meta-analysis (Supplementary Information). Each x-axis reports the marginal association with epigenetic age acceleration (as detailed in Supplementary Information and Fig. s7). The sign of the log (base 10) transformed P-value was chosen so that a positive (negative) value indicates that the CpG has a positive (negative) correlation with age acceleration. Each y-axis reports the marginal association with DS status (as detailed in Fig. s8). The sign of the log-transformed P-value was defined such that a positive value indicates that the CpG is hypermethylated in DS subjects. The 353 clock CpGs are colored according to their age correlation in the original training data set from (Horvath, 2013): red and blue for clock CpGs that have a positive and negative age correlation, respectively. The red horizontal and vertical lines correspond to an uncorrected P-value threshold of 0.05.

CpGs that relate to DS status tend to be correlated with age acceleration. (a–c) Results for data sets 1–3, respectively. d) Results of a meta-analysis (Supplementary Information). Each x-axis reports the marginal association with epigenetic age acceleration (as detailed in Supplementary Information and Fig. s7). The sign of the log (base 10) transformed P-value was chosen so that a positive (negative) value indicates that the CpG has a positive (negative) correlation with age acceleration. Each y-axis reports the marginal association with DS status (as detailed in Fig. s8). The sign of the log-transformed P-value was defined such that a positive value indicates that the CpG is hypermethylated in DS subjects. The 353 clock CpGs are colored according to their age correlation in the original training data set from (Horvath, 2013): red and blue for clock CpGs that have a positive and negative age correlation, respectively. The red horizontal and vertical lines correspond to an uncorrected P-value threshold of 0.05. Strikingly, CpGs that are associated with DS status tend to be correlated with epigenetic age acceleration (Fig.2). For example, we present CpGs that are hypermethylated in DS subjects and have a positive correlation with age acceleration in Fig. s9. These two CpGs correspond to the two magenta triangles in the upper right hand corner of Fig.2d. It is noteworthy that CpG cg12186917 is located on chromosome 21 (near gene CRYZL1). The other CpG cg04455759 is close to gene MRPL42 (mitochondrial ribosomal protein L42) on chromosome 12. We also present two CpGs that are both hypomethylated in DS subjects and have a negative correlation with age acceleration (Fig. s10). These CpGs correspond to the green triangles in the lower left corner of Fig.2d. CpG cg11678767 is located near COL4A6 (type IV alpha 6 collagen isoform A precursor) on the X chromosome, whereas CpG cg20425293 is located near gene SDHD (succinate dehydrogenase complex; subunit D precursor) on chromosome 11. Results for individual CpGs can be found in the Supporting File. A detailed marginal analysis is beyond our scope but we briefly point out that it is already known that DS does not affect global methylation levels in blood (Kerkel et al., 2010) or buccal epithelium (Jones et al., 2013a). Due to a lack of transcriptional data, we could not directly correlate epigenetic age acceleration with gene expression levels in this study. Several studies have looked at altered gene expression levels in DS subjects, for example, (Esposito et al., 2008; Costa et al., 2011; Letourneau et al., 2014). (Letourneau et al., 2014) showed that the nuclear compartments of trisomic cells undergo modifications of the chromatin environment influencing the overall transcriptome. To the best of our knowledge, the epigenetic clock approach facilitated the first analysis of DS on age-related epigenetic modifications. Our results indicate that DS can be interpreted as segmental progeria, which affects at least two disparate tissues. As it is well known that DS is associated with clinical manifestations of premature aging in brain and to a lesser extent in blood tissue, it is reassuring that we observe significant age acceleration effects in brain (11 years) and blood (4 years) tissue. Future studies should evaluate whether the extent of epigenetic age acceleration relates to the prevalence of age-related conditions across tissues.
  22 in total

1.  Dementia of the Alzheimer's type and accelerated aging in Down syndrome.

Authors:  D A Devenny; J Wegiel; N Schupf; E Jenkins; W Zigman; S J Krinsky-McHale; W P Silverman
Journal:  Sci Aging Knowledge Environ       Date:  2005-04-06

2.  Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Susan J Ramus; Daniel J Weisenberger; Hui Shen; Mihaela Campan; Houtan Noushmehr; Christopher G Bell; A Peter Maxwell; David A Savage; Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner; Christian Marth; Gabrijela Kocjan; Simon A Gayther; Allison Jones; Stephan Beck; Wolfgang Wagner; Peter W Laird; Ian J Jacobs; Martin Widschwendter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Genomic and functional profiling of human Down syndrome neural progenitors implicates S100B and aquaporin 4 in cell injury.

Authors:  Giuseppe Esposito; Jaime Imitola; Jie Lu; Daniele De Filippis; Caterina Scuderi; Vijay S Ganesh; Rebecca Folkerth; Jonathan Hecht; Soojung Shin; Teresa Iuvone; Jonathan Chesnut; Luca Steardo; Volney Sheen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.

Authors:  H Vaziri; F Schächter; I Uchida; L Wei; X Zhu; R Effros; D Cohen; C B Harley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Increased "absence" of telomeres may indicate Alzheimer's disease/dementia status in older individuals with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Edmund C Jenkins; Lingling Ye; Hong Gu; Samantha A Ni; Charlotte J Duncan; Milen Velinov; Deborah Pang; Sharon J Krinsky-McHale; Warren B Zigman; Nicole Schupf; Wayne P Silverman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Domains of genome-wide gene expression dysregulation in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Audrey Letourneau; Federico A Santoni; Ximena Bonilla; M Reza Sailani; David Gonzalez; Jop Kind; Claire Chevalier; Robert Thurman; Richard S Sandstrom; Youssef Hibaoui; Marco Garieri; Konstantin Popadin; Emilie Falconnet; Maryline Gagnebin; Corinne Gehrig; Anne Vannier; Michel Guipponi; Laurent Farinelli; Daniel Robyr; Eugenia Migliavacca; Christelle Borel; Samuel Deutsch; Anis Feki; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Yann Herault; Bas van Steensel; Roderic Guigo; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Neuroanatomy of Down syndrome in vivo: a model of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stefan J Teipel; Harald Hampel
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.

Authors:  Steve Horvath
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  DNA methylation, genotype and gene expression: who is driving and who is along for the ride?

Authors:  Meaghan J Jones; Anthony P Fejes; Michael S Kobor
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue.

Authors:  Steve Horvath; Yafeng Zhang; Peter Langfelder; René S Kahn; Marco P M Boks; Kristel van Eijk; Leonard H van den Berg; Roel A Ophoff
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  195 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic regulation of ageing: linking environmental inputs to genomic stability.

Authors:  Bérénice A Benayoun; Elizabeth A Pollina; Anne Brunet
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Suppression of transcriptional drift extends C. elegans lifespan by postponing the onset of mortality.

Authors:  Sunitha Rangaraju; Gregory M Solis; Ryan C Thompson; Rafael L Gomez-Amaro; Leo Kurian; Sandra E Encalada; Alexander B Niculescu; Daniel R Salomon; Michael Petrascheck
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Cognitive decline and brain amyloid-β accumulation across 3 years in adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Sigan L Hartley; Benjamin L Handen; Darlynne Devenny; Iulia Mihaila; Regina Hardison; Patrick J Lao; William E Klunk; Peter Bulova; Sterling C Johnson; Bradley T Christian
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment.

Authors:  R Karlsson Linnér; R E Marioni; C A Rietveld; A J Simpkin; N M Davies; K Watanabe; N J Armstrong; K Auro; C Baumbach; M J Bonder; J Buchwald; G Fiorito; K Ismail; S Iurato; A Joensuu; P Karell; S Kasela; J Lahti; A F McRae; P R Mandaviya; I Seppälä; Y Wang; L Baglietto; E B Binder; S E Harris; A M Hodge; S Horvath; M Hurme; M Johannesson; A Latvala; K A Mather; S E Medland; A Metspalu; L Milani; R L Milne; A Pattie; N L Pedersen; A Peters; S Polidoro; K Räikkönen; G Severi; J M Starr; L Stolk; M Waldenberger; J G Eriksson; T Esko; L Franke; C Gieger; G G Giles; S Hägg; P Jousilahti; J Kaprio; M Kähönen; T Lehtimäki; N G Martin; J B C van Meurs; M Ollikainen; M Perola; D Posthuma; O T Raitakari; P S Sachdev; E Taskesen; A G Uitterlinden; P Vineis; C Wijmenga; M J Wright; C Relton; G Davey Smith; I J Deary; P D Koellinger; D J Benjamin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Epigenetic Aging in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Laura K M Han; Moji Aghajani; Shaunna L Clark; Robin F Chan; Mohammad W Hattab; Andrey A Shabalin; Min Zhao; Gaurav Kumar; Lin Ying Xie; Rick Jansen; Yuri Milaneschi; Brian Dean; Karolina A Aberg; Edwin J C G van den Oord; Brenda W J H Penninx
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Methylome-wide Analysis of Chronic HIV Infection Reveals Five-Year Increase in Biological Age and Epigenetic Targeting of HLA.

Authors:  Andrew M Gross; Philipp A Jaeger; Jason F Kreisberg; Katherine Licon; Kristen L Jepsen; Mahdieh Khosroheidari; Brenda M Morsey; Susan Swindells; Hui Shen; Cherie T Ng; Ken Flagg; Daniel Chen; Kang Zhang; Howard S Fox; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  DNA methylation-based variation between human populations.

Authors:  Farzeen Kader; Meenu Ghai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Translational Geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions.

Authors:  Mitchell B Lee; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Transl Med Aging       Date:  2018-08-17

9.  Association of Epigenetic Clock with Consensus Molecular Subtypes and Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chunlei Zheng; Li Li; Rong Xu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Polyubiquitinylation Profile in Down Syndrome Brain Before and After the Development of Alzheimer Neuropathology.

Authors:  Antonella Tramutola; Fabio Di Domenico; Eugenio Barone; Andrea Arena; Alessandra Giorgi; Laura di Francesco; Maria Eugenia Schininà; Raffaella Coccia; Elizabeth Head; D Allan Butterfield; Marzia Perluigi
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 8.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.