| Literature DB >> 31505750 |
Maria Papale1, Angelina Lo Giudice2, Antonella Conte3, Carmen Rizzo4, Alessandro C Rappazzo5, Giovanna Maimone6, Gabriella Caruso7, Rosabruna La Ferla8, Maurizio Azzaro9, Concetta Gugliandolo10, Rodolfo Paranhos11, Anderson S Cabral12, Vincenzo Romano Spica13, Mauro Guglielmin14.
Abstract
Two distinct pressurized hypersaline brine pockets (named TF4 and TF5), separated by a thin ice layer, were detected below an ice-sealed Antarctic lake. Prokaryotic (bacterial and archaeal) diversity, abundances (including virus-like particles) and metabolic profiles were investigated by an integrated approach, including traditional and new-generation methods. Although similar diversity indices were computed for both Bacteria and Archaea, distinct bacterial and archaeal assemblages were observed. Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria were more abundant in the shallowest brine pocket, TF4, and Deltaproteobacteria, mainly represented by versatile sulphate-reducing bacteria, dominated in the deepest, TF5. The detection of sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic Archaea likely reflects the presence of a distinct synthrophic consortium in TF5. Surprisingly, members assigned to hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota were common to both brines, indicating that these cold habitats host the most thermally tolerant Archaea. The patterns of microbial communities were different, coherently with the observed microbiological diversity between TF4 and TF5 brines. Both the influence exerted by upward movement of saline brines from a sub-surface anoxic system and the possible occurrence of an ancient ice remnant from the Ross Ice Shelf were the likely main factors shaping the microbial communities.Entities:
Keywords: brine pockets; hyperthermophiles; metabolic potential; methanogens; sulphur-reducing bacteria
Year: 2019 PMID: 31505750 PMCID: PMC6780602 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7090333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Study area: (a) Tarn Flat location; (b) a view of the Tarn Flat, its pingo-like feature (PLF) in the middle (photo courtesy by Michele Dalle Fratte and modified), and the extremes of the section reported in the next panel; (c) Lake section. Legend: light grey: lake and PLF ice; grey: hypersaline brines; dashed lines refer to the slope of PLF and the edges of the fracture located underneath the PLF deducted by GPR analyses by Forte et al. [23].
Morphometrical and morphological features of the prokaryotic cells in the brines TF4 and TF5.
| Feature | TF4 | TF5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cell length (µm) |
| 0.543 ± 0.200 | 0.832 ± 0.580 |
|
| 0.32 | 0.21 | |
|
| 1.04 | 3.01 | |
| cell width (µm) |
| 0.342 ± 0.08 | 0.432 ± 0.140 |
|
| 0.21 | 0.21 | |
|
| 0.53 | 0.95 | |
| mean cell VOL (µm3) |
| 0.040 ± 0.027 | 0.105 ± 0.104 |
| total biovolume (µm3 mL−1) |
| 0.20 ± 0.11 | 0.85 ± 0.42 |
| coccobacilli (µm3) |
| 0.058 ± 0.021 | 0.101 ± 0.084 |
| cocci (µm3) |
| 0.029 ± 0.019 | 0.083 ± 0.107 |
| rods (µm3) |
| 0.040 ± 0.034 | 0.113 ± 0.117 |
| curved rods (µm3) |
| n.d. | 0.213 ± 0.098 |
The raw substrate utilization with absorbances over 0.10 OD recorded at plate level, referred to as averaged substrate color development (ASCD) with time, and the number of positive wells (S) (a). The diversity measures of substrate utilization of the brine samples determined at the time of maxima ASCD value (b).
| TF4 | TF5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ASCD | S | ASCD | S |
| 17/11/2014 | 0.070 | 6 | 0.085 | 9 |
| 19/11/2014 | 0.073 | 8 | 0.022 | 4 |
| 21/11/2014 |
| 9 | 0.035 | 5 |
| 23/11/2014 | 0.055 | 8 | 0.042 | 4 |
| 25/11/2014 | 0.021 | 3 | 0.038 | 4 |
| 27/11/2014 | 0.016 | 1 | 0.038 | 4 |
| 29/11/2014 | 0.059 | 10 | 0.050 | 7 |
| 01/12/2014 | 0.060 | 8 | 0.047 | 5 |
| 03/12/2014 | 0.068 |
| 0.079 | 11 |
| 05/12/2014 | 0.069 |
| 0.096 | 15 |
| 07/12/2014 | 0.058 | 10 | 0.216 | 25 |
| 09/12/2014 | 0.061 |
| 0.341 | 28 |
| 11/12/2014 | 0.059 | 8 |
|
|
| (b) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
Figure 2Pattern of utilization of the 31 carbon sources for TF4 and TF5 samples. The box color is indicative of the percentage absorbance range of the total absorbance of the plate. Values are as follows: white < 2%; light grey 2–4%; dark grey 4–6%; black > 6%. Below each column, the number of substrates with greater or equal to 2%, 4% and 6% absorbance for each sample.
Figure 3Individual carbon source oxidation—as a percentage of the total absorbance—in TF4 and TF5 brines.
Mean values ± standard deviation of the bulk maximum rates of enzymatic hydrolysis Vmax, cell-specific enzymatic activities and reciprocal molar ratios of the enzymatic activities measured in the two brine samples.
| TF4 | TF5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vmax | LAP | 2.04 ± 0.72 | 1.97 ± 0.25 |
| (nmol L−1 h−1) | AP | 1.05 ± 1.26 | 1.03 ± 0.09 |
| β-GLU | 2.53 ± 3.90 | 0.12 ± 0.09 | |
| Cell-specific | LAP | 0.41 ± 0.02 × 10−8 | 2.44 ± 0.05 × 10−9 |
| activity | AP | 2.10 ± 0.04 × 10−9 | 1.28 ± 0.02 × 10−9 |
| (amol cell−1 h−1) | β-GLU | 0.50 ± 0.02 × 10−8 | 1.44 ± 0.03 × 10−10 |
| C:P | 1.51 ± 0.31 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | |
| C:N | 1.09 ± 0.54 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | |
| N:P | 1.38 ± 0.04 | 1.37 ± 0.03 |
Abbreviations: LAP, leucin aminopeptidase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; β-GLU, β-glucosidase; C:P, ratio obtained from ln(β-GLU):ln(AP); C:N, ratio obtained from ln(β-GLU):ln(LAP); N:P, ratio obtained from ln(LAP):ln(AP).
Figure 4Bacterial (a) and archaeal (b) communities in TF4 and TF5 brines.
Figure 5Heatmaps of presence and abundance of bacterial (a) and archaeal (b) genera in the brine samples. Color blocks represent the relative abundance of genera. More darkness indicates a higher relative abundance.