Literature DB >> 31504588

Prognostic models will be victims of their own success, unless….

Matthew C Lenert1, Michael E Matheny2,3,4,5, Colin G Walsh2,4,6.   

Abstract

Predictive analytics have begun to change the workflows of healthcare by giving insight into our future health. Deploying prognostic models into clinical workflows should change behavior and motivate interventions that affect outcomes. As users respond to model predictions, downstream characteristics of the data, including the distribution of the outcome, may change. The ever-changing nature of healthcare necessitates maintenance of prognostic models to ensure their longevity. The more effective a model and intervention(s) are at improving outcomes, the faster a model will appear to degrade. Improving outcomes can disrupt the association between the model's predictors and the outcome. Model refitting may not always be the most effective response to these challenges. These problems will need to be mitigated by systematically incorporating interventions into prognostic models and by maintaining robust performance surveillance of models in clinical use. Holistically modeling the outcome and intervention(s) can lead to resilience to future compromises in performance.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  learning health system; model updating; predictive modeling

Year:  2019        PMID: 31504588      PMCID: PMC6857506          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  56 in total

1.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.

Authors:  David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman; Samuel Wang; Tejal Gandhi; Anne Kittler; Lynn Volk; Cynthia Spurr; Ramin Khorasani; Milenko Tanasijevic; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evaluating Discrimination of Risk Prediction Models: The C Statistic.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Yvonne Vergouwe; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-04

4.  The impact of electronic health records on workflow and financial measures in primary care practices.

Authors:  Neil S Fleming; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; Dunlei Cheng; Russell McCorkle; Briget da Graca; David J Ballard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Risk prediction with machine learning and regression methods.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Tjeerd van der Ploeg; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Managing change: an overview.

Authors:  N M Lorenzi; R T Riley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Machine Learning for Healthcare: On the Verge of a Major Shift in Healthcare Epidemiology.

Authors:  Jenna Wiens; Erica S Shenoy
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine.

Authors:  R A Miller; H E Pople; J D Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Thomas A Lasko; Guanhua Chen; Edward D Siew; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism.

Authors:  Julia Dressel; Hany Farid
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of Electronic Health Record-Based Suicide Risk Prediction Models on Contemporary Data.

Authors:  Rod L Walker; Susan M Shortreed; Rebecca A Ziebell; Eric Johnson; Jennifer M Boggs; Frances L Lynch; Yihe G Daida; Brian K Ahmedani; Rebecca Rossom; Karen J Coleman; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Clinical artificial intelligence quality improvement: towards continual monitoring and updating of AI algorithms in healthcare.

Authors:  Jean Feng; Rachael V Phillips; Ivana Malenica; Andrew Bishara; Alan E Hubbard; Leo A Celi; Romain Pirracchio
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica M Schwartz; Amanda J Moy; Sarah C Rossetti; Noémie Elhadad; Kenrick D Cato
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Health improvement framework for actionable treatment planning using a surrogate Bayesian model.

Authors:  Kazuki Nakamura; Ryosuke Kojima; Eiichiro Uchino; Koh Ono; Motoko Yanagita; Koichi Murashita; Ken Itoh; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Yasushi Okuno
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Explicit causal reasoning is needed to prevent prognostic models being victims of their own success.

Authors:  Matthew Sperrin; David Jenkins; Glen P Martin; Niels Peek
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Review of Clinical Research Informatics.

Authors:  Anthony Solomonides
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

7.  Clinician checklist for assessing suitability of machine learning applications in healthcare.

Authors:  Ian Scott; Stacey Carter; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-02

8.  Prospective Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based, Real-Time Suicide Risk Model.

Authors:  Colin G Walsh; Kevin B Johnson; Michael Ripperger; Sarah Sperry; Joyce Harris; Nathaniel Clark; Elliot Fielstein; Laurie Novak; Katelyn Robinson; William W Stead
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

9.  Counterfactual prediction is not only for causal inference.

Authors:  Barbra A Dickerman; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Transforming clinical data into wisdom: Artificial intelligence implications for nurse leaders.

Authors:  Kenrick D Cato; Kathleen McGrow; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  Nurs Manage       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.